Calf serum lubricants consisting of various polypeptide constituent fractions are routinely used in knee wear simulators as part of the standardized test protocol. Three calf sera (bovine, new-born and alpha) were diluted as per the recommendation of ISO 14243-3 and used in displacement-controlled knee wear simulators to investigate their effects on polyethylene wear. Biochemical analyses included measuring total polypeptide degradation, electrophoretic profiles and low-molecular weight polypeptide concentrations to elucidate their involvement in the wear process. The effects of the various calf sera constituent fractions on microbial growth were also explored. The polyethylene wear rates and the results from the biochemical analyses for the three calf serum lubricants were all found to be statistically significantly different from each other. The lubricant derived from the alpha-calf serum was closest in constituent fractions to human synovial fluid. It also showed the lowest polyethylene wear rate (14.38 ± 0.85 mm3/million cycles) and the lowest amount of polypeptide degradation (7.77 ± 3.87%). Furthermore, the alpha-calf serum lubricant was associated with the least amount of change in the electrophoretic profile, the least change in low-molecular weight polypeptide concentration, and the lowest microbial growth in the presence of sodium azide (a microbial inhibitor conventionally used in implant wear testing). Replacing sodium azide with a broad spectrum antibiotic-antimycotic eradicated the microbial growth. Some speculation was entertained regarding the effect of alpha-calf serum on colloid-mediated boundary lubrication. Based on the results, it was recommended that ISO 14243-3 be modified to include guidelines on calf serum constituent fractions that would favour using alpha-calf serum in order to improve the fidelity of the simulation in knee implant wear testing.
LaverniaCJGuzmanJFGachupin-GarciaA. Cost effectiveness and quality of life in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res1997; 345: 134–139.
2.
LaverniaCLeeDJHernandezVH. The increasing financial burden of knee revision surgery in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res2006; 446: 221–226.
3.
SharkeyPFHozackWJRothmanRH. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?Clin Orthop2002; 404: 7–13.
4.
AspenbergPvan der VisH. Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis. Particles are not the only thing. Acta Orthop Scand1998; 69(1): 1–4.
5.
InghamEFisherJ. The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials2005; 26(11): 1271–1286.
6.
BurnsAWBourneRBChesworthBM. Cost effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res2006; 446: 29–33.
7.
KurtzSOngKLauE. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89(4): 780–785.
8.
KurtzSMLauEOngK. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res2009; 467(10): 2606–2612.
9.
WalkerPSBlunnGWBroomeDR. A knee simulating machine for performance evaluation of total knee replacements. J Biomech1997; 30(1): 83–89.
10.
BarnettPIMcEwenHMAugerDD. Investigation of wear of knee prostheses in a new displacement/force-controlled simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2002; 216(1): 51–61.
11.
ISO 14243-1: 2009. Implants for surgery: wear of total knee joint prostheses. Part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test.
12.
ISO 14243-3: 2004. Implants for surgery: wear of total knee joint prostheses. Part 3: loading and displacement parameters for wear testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for test.
13.
BrandtJMBriereLKMarrJ. Biochemical comparisons of osteoarthritic human synovial fluid with calf sera used in knee simulator wear testing. J Biomed Mater Res A2010; 94(3): 961–971.
14.
HarshaAPJoyceTJ. Challenges associated with using bovine serum in wear testing orthopaedic biopolymers. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2011; 225(10): 948–958.
15.
LiaoYSBenyaPDMcKellopHA. Effect of protein lubrication on the wear properties of materials for prosthetic joints. J Biomed Mater Res1999; 48(4): 465–473.
16.
GoodVDClarkeICGustafsonGA. Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and polytetrafluoroethylene in a hip simulator: a dose-response study of protein concentration. Acta Orthop Scand2000; 71(4): 365–369.
17.
WangAEssnerASchmidigG. The effects of lubricant composition on in vitro wear testing of polymeric acetabular components. J Biomed Mater Res2004; 68B(1): 45–52.
18.
DesJardinsJAuroraATannerSL. Increased total knee arthroplasty ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear using a clinically relevant hyaluronic acid simulator lubricant. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220(5): 609–623.
19.
WidmerMRHeubergerMVorosJ. Influence of polymer surface chemistry on frictional properties under protein-lubrication: implications for hip-implant design. Tribol Lett2001; 10(1–2): 111–115.
20.
LiaoYSMcKellopHLuZ. The effect of frictional heating and forced cooling on the serum lubricant and wear of UHMW polyethylene cups against cobalt-chromium and zirconia balls. Biomaterials2003; 24(18): 3047–3059.
21.
HeubergerMPWidmerMRZobeleyE. Protein-mediated boundary lubrication in arthroplasty. Biomaterials2005; 26(10): 1165–1173.
22.
SerroAPGispertMPMartinsMC. Adsorption of albumin on prosthetic materials: implication for tribological behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A2006; 78(3): 581–589.
23.
KaruppiahKKSSundararajanSXuZH. The effect of protein adsorption on the friction behavior of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Tribol Lett2006; 22(2): 181–188.
24.
FangHWHsiehMCHuangHT. Conformational and adsorptive characteristics of albumin affect interfacial protein boundary lubrication: from experimental to molecular dynamics simulation approaches. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2009; 68(2): 171–177.
25.
SerroAPDegiampietroKColacoR. Adsorption of albumin and sodium hyaluronate on UHMWPE: a QCM-D and AFM study. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2010; 78(1): 1–7.
26.
GranickSKumarSKAmisEJ. Macromolecules at surfaces: Research challenges and opportunities from tribology to biology. J Poly Sci Part B – Poly Physics2003; 41: 2755–2793.
27.
GeorgesJ-MMazuyerDTonckA. Lubrication with a thin colloid layer. J Phys Condens Matter1990; 2: SA399–SA403.
28.
GeorgesJ-MLoubetJ-L. Pressure effects on the shearing of a colloidal thin film. J Phys Condens Matter1991; 3: 9545–9550.
29.
GeorgesJ-MTonckALoubetJ-L. Rheology and friction of compressed polymer layers adsorbed on solid surfaces. J Phys II France1996; 6: 57–76.
30.
ChanFWBobynJDMedleyJB. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res1999; 369: 10–24.
31.
WimmerMALoosJNassuttR. The acting wear mechanisms on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings: in vitro results. Wear2001; 250(1–12): 129–139.
KleinJKumachevaEMahaluD. Reduction of frictional forces between solid surfaces bearing polymer brushes. Nature1994; 370 (6491): p.634–636.
34.
KleinJKumachevaEPerahiaD. Shear forces between sliding surfaces coated with polymer brushes: The high friction regime. Acta Polymerica1998; 49(10–11): 617–625.
TsarkovaLAProtsenkoPVKleinJ. Interactions between Langmuir–Blodgett polymer monolayers studied with the surface force apparatus. Colloid J2004; 66(1): 84–94.
37.
TsarkovaLZhangXHadjichristidisN. Friction and relaxation dynamics of highly extended polymer brush melts under compression and shear. Macromolecules2007; 40(7): 2539–2547.
38.
RavivUGiassonSKampfN. Lubrication by charged polymers. Nature2003; 425(6954): 163–165.
39.
BrandtJ-MCharronKDZhaoL. Commissioning of a displacement-controlled knee wear simulator and exploration of some issues related to the lubricant. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2011; 225(8): 736–752.
BrièreLKBrandtJ-MMedleyJB. Measurement of protein denaturation in human synovial fluid and its analogues using differential scanning calorimetry. J Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry2010; 102(1): 99–106.
42.
LeboffeMJPierceB. Microbiology: Laboratory theory and application. Morton Publishing Company (Englewood, CO) 2002, p.220–250
43.
AndersonEH. Growth requirements of virus-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli strain “B”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1946; 32(5): 120–128.
44.
BertaniG. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol1951; 62(3): 293–300.
45.
BrandtJMHaydonCMHarveyEP. Semi-quantitative assessment methods for backside polyethylene damage in modular total knee replacements. Tribol Int2012; 49(0): 96–102.
46.
BrandtJ-MMacDonaldSJBourneRB. Retrieval analysis of modular total knee replacements: factors influencing backside surface damage. The Knee. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.06.00710.1016/j.knee.2011.06.007.
47.
McKellopHClarkeICMarkolfKL. Wear characteristics of UHMW polyethylene: a method for accurately measuring extremely low wear rates. J Biomed Mater Res1978; 12(6): 895–927.
48.
McKellopHACampbellPParkSH. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop1995; 311: 3–20.
49.
WangAPolineniVKEssnerA. The impact of lubricant concentration on the outcome of hip joint simulator testing. Trans Soc Biomat1999; 22: 178.
50.
ClarkeICChanFWEssnerA. Multi-laboratory simulator studies on effects of serum proteins on PTFE cup wear. Wear2001; 250(1–12): 188–198.
51.
KaddickCWimmerMA. Hip simulator wear testing according to the newly introduced standard ISO 14242. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2001; 215(5): 429–442.
52.
McEwenHMBarnettPIBellCJ. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech2005; 38(2): 357–365.
53.
SchwenkeTKaddickCSchneiderE. Fluid composition impacts standardized testing protocols in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene knee wear testing. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2005; 219(6): 457–464.
54.
GillHSWaiteJCShortA. In vivo measurement of volumetric wear of a total knee replacement. Knee2006; 13(4): 312–317.
55.
BellJBesongAATipperJL. Influence of gelatin and bovine serum lubricants on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris generated in in vitro simulations. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2000; 214(5): 513–518.
56.
FischerJJJardetzkyO. Nuclear magnetic relaxation study of intermolecular complexes. The mechanism of penicillin binding to serum albumin. J Am Chem Soc1965; 87: 3237–3244.
57.
ScholtanWRosenkranzHScheerM. Binding of sisomicin and streptomycin to human albumin. Infection1978; 6(4): 162–165.
58.
RosenkranzHScheerMScholtanW. Binding of aminoglycoside antibiotics to human serum proteins. III. Effect of experimental conditions. Infection1978; 6(2): 57–64.
59.
WimmerMASahRMadsenL. The effect of antibacterial and antifungal additives on the wear rate of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. In: Symposium on wear of articulating surfaces: understanding joint simulation, ASTM Meeting, Dallas, 2005.
60.
PatersonDL. Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae. Am J Infect Control2006; 34(5Suppl 1): S20–28; discussion S64–73.
61.
GraindorgeSFerrandezWJinZ. Biphasic surface amorphous layer lubrication of articular cartilage. Med Eng Phys2005; 27(10): 836–844.
62.
GraindorgeSFerrandezWInghamE. The role of the surface amorphous layer of articular cartilage in joint lubrication. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220(5): 597–607.
63.
AteshianGA. The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication. J Biomech2009; 42(9): 1163–1176.
