Design of a surgical instrument for removing bone to provide screw access to a spinal fusion cage

Abstract

A surgical instrument to aid implantation of a range of lumbar spinal fusion cages has been developed. Once the cage is in position, the entrance to screw holes is partially blocked by the edge of the vertebral body. In order to insert fixation screws to secure the cage between the vertebrae, some part of the blocking edge has to be removed. Rongeurs are currently being used, but they can be time consuming and have the disadvantage that they may remove more bone than is necessary and may cause damage to the fusion cage if not used with care. In addition, access around some of the screw holes may be difficult. The aim of this instrument was to overcome these shortcomings. This paper describes the design of a surgical instrument for cutting edges from vertebral bodies. The development and evaluation of concept designs are presented and discussed. Potential risks were considered and modifications were performed on the selected concept. Functional prototypes were manufactured and tested on sheep lumbar vertebrae. The results showed that the newly designed cutting instrument functions as required and removes the required amount of bone from the vertebral body edge.

Keywords

Bone cutter design spine surgical instrument

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cho

Liau

Lee

. Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurg 2002; 51(6): 1343–1349.

Mcafee

Maryland

. Current concepts review – interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81(6): 859–80.

Axelsson

Johnsson

Strömqvist

. Stability after anterior lumbar fusion with interbody cages: a radiostereometric evaluation. Open Spine J 2009; 1: 14–17.

Mastronardi

Ducati

Ferrante

. Anterior cervical fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Preliminary observations in 36 consecutive cases with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Acta Neurochir 2006; 148(3): 307–312.

Aitchison

Hukins

DWL

Parry

. A review of the design process for implantable orthopedic medical devices. Open Biomed Eng J 2009; 3: 21–27.

Leahy

Stevenson

Hukins

DWL

. Development of surgical instrumentation for implanting a flexible fixation device for the lumbar spine. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2000; 214(3): 325–328.

BS EN ISO 13485. Medical devices – quality management systems – requirements for regulatory purposes.

Food and Drug Administration. Design control guidance for medical device manufactures – this guidance relates to FDA 21 CFR 820.30 and sub-clause 4.4 of ISO 9001. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA, 1997.

Quality System Regulation 21 CFR 820. Basic introduction. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, 20993, USA, 2011.

10.

BS EN ISO 9001. Quality management systems – requirements.

11.

Shepherd

DET

. Risk analysis for a radio-carpal joint replacement. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2002; 216(1): 23–29.

12.

BS EN ISO 14971:2009. Medical devices – application of risk management to medical devices.

13.

Holmes

Hukins

DWL

Freemont

. End-plate displacement during compression of lumbar vertebra-disc-vertebra segments and the mechanism of failure. Spine 1993; 18(1): 128–135.

14.

Motoyoshi

Hirabayashi

Uemura

. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(1): 109–114.