The variable working conditions faced by different flight stages in the whole process of hypersonic flight put forward different requirements for the aerodynamic shape of the aircraft. This paper presents a decoupled multi-stage extension and arbitrarily directional bending deformable nose cone design method for hypersonic vehicles. Combined with the flight conditions, the loads and required driving forces during the morphing of the nose cone were calculated under different flight attitudes. By establishing the coupled dynamic model of extension, bending and rotation of the mechanism, the driving torque, law of motion and positioning accuracy with clearance of the nose cone were systematically analyzed. Research shows that the maximum extension driving torque of the nose cone is approximately 81.81 N·m, the rotational driving torque of the curved section is approximately 43.65 N·m, and the bending driving torque of the curved section is approximately 52.97 N·m. The axial extension morphing of the nose cone is 1300 mm, and the maximum bending Angle is 32.09°. Under clearance conditions, the translation displacement error of the deformable nose cone mechanism is within 1.5 mm, and the angular displacement error is approximately 0.4°. The analysis results show that the structure designed in this paper has the advantages of large morphing range, and high actuation accuracy for hypersonic vehicle morphing.
VasistaSNolteFMonnerHP, et al.Three-dimensional design of a large-displacement morphing wing droop nose device. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2018; 29(16): 3222–3241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x18770863
4.
GeWZhangYLiuB, et al.Structure design of deformed wing based on topology optimization method of hyper elastic materials. Aero Sci Technol2022; 33(12): 70–80.
5.
ArenaMConcilioAPecoraR. Aero-servo-elastic design of a morphing wing trailing edge system for enhanced cruise performance. Aero Sci Technol2019; 86: 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.020
6.
CavalieriVGaspariARicciS. Optimization of compliant adaptive structures in the design of a morphing droop nose. Smart Mater Struct2020; 29(7): 22.
7.
ZhangMXueJWangW, et al.Design and verification of multi-motor distributed control system for trailing edge of variable cambour wing. Aero Sci Technol2022; 33(12): 88–96.
8.
KammegneMJTGrigorieLTBotezRM, et al.Design and wind tunnel experimental validation of a controlled new rotary actuation system for a morphing wing application. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2016; 230(1): 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015588573
9.
BudarapuPNatarajanrR. Design concepts of an aircraft wing: composite and morphing airfoil with auxetic structures. Front Struct Civ Eng2016; 10(4): 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z
10.
KammegneMJBotezRMGrigorieL, et al.Proportional fuzzy feed-forward architecture control validation by wind tunnel tests of a morphing wing. Chin J Aeronaut2017; 30(2): 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.02.001
11.
ManzoJGarciaE. Demonstration of an in-situ morphing hyper elliptical cambered span wing mechanism. Smart Mater Struct2010; 19(2): 025012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/19/2/025012
WuBDuXWangJ. Progress of intelligent structure technology for morphing aircraft. Aero Sci Technol2022; 33(12):13–30.
14.
RodrigueHChoSHanMW, et al.Effect of twist morphing wing segment on aerodynamic performance of UAV. J Mech Sci Technol2016; 30(1): 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1226-3
15.
JenettBCalischSCellucciD, et al.Digital morphing wing: active wing shaping concept using composite lattice-based cellular structures. Soft Robot2017; 4(1): 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2016.0032
16.
VockeIIIRDKotheraCSWoodsBKS, et al.Development and testing of a span-extending morphing wing. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2011; 22(9): 879–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x11411121
GreatwoodCWaldockARichardsonT. Perched landing manoeuvres with a variable sweep wing UAV. Aero Sci Technol2017; 71: 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.09.034
21.
DaiPYanBHuangW, et al.Design and aerodynamic performance analysis of a variable-sweep-wing morphing wave rider. Aero Sci Technol2020; 98: 105703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105703
BaiHLiYLiuM, et al. Research on aerodynamic characteristics of vehicle with partial nose profile morphing. N Technol N Process. 2011; (09): 74–77.
24.
ZhangYWuHZhaoJ, et al.Design and performance analysis of morphing nose cone driven by a novel bionic parallel mechanism for aerospace vehicle. Aero Sci Technol2023; 139: 108365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108365
25.
FengBChenDWangJ, et al.Effect of nose shape on mechanical properties of supersonic vehicle. Flight Dyn2012; 30(6): 537–540.
26.
ZhuRDongEBZhangJ, et al. Aerodynamic simulation and shape optimization of aircraft with deflected nose. Mach Electron. 2008; (08): 6–8.
27.
BaiH. Research on the effect of partial nose contour morphing on enhancing the maneuverability of aircraft [D]. University of Science and Technology of China, 2011.
28.
ChengGYangGGuoH, et al.Key techniques of hypersonic aircraft morphings review. Aero Sci Technol2024; 35(5): 28–44. / j. issn1007-5453.2024.05.003.
29.
WuXZhaoJ. Design and motion simulation analysis of noncircular morphing nose cone mechanism. J Astronaut2021; 42(07): 830–838.
30.
GuoXLiJChenW, et al.Design and simulation of morphing nose cone based on umbrella guide rod mechanism. Opt Precis Eng2018; 26(02): 336–343.
31.
EnduoZGuoXZhangL, et al.Design and simulation analysis of deformed nose cone of aircraft with sleeve slider guide bar mechanism [C]. Beijing mechanical society. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of Beijing force society, beijing, 2017-01-14, March 2017. Department of Mechanical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Tribology. Tsinghua University.
32.
YuZLiWLiuH, et al.Torque characteristics analysis of a new hypersonic vehicle based on the concept of variable nose cone. J North China Univ Technol2019; 36(05): 76–88.
