Fluorescent tuft visualization technology, as a practical and convenient technique, has attracted widespread attention. In this study, a novel fluorescent tuft velocity measurement method is developed based on existing technologies. This method involves the recognition of tuft deflection angles, image transformation, block processing, temporal averaging, and post-visualization processing. Additionally, quantitative measurement of flow field velocity is achieved through tuft calibration. The study begins by comparing tufts of different materials, examining both fluorescent and deflection characteristics to determine optimal tuft parameters. The impact of tuft length on deflection characteristics is also investigated. Finally, the cotton tuft with a length of 7 mm and a diameter of about 0.1 mm was obtained as the best tuft sought in this experiment. Subsequently, at Reynolds number Re = 1.7 × 105, airfoil surface flow field visualization and quantitative analysis are conducted, exploring the relationship between airfoil surface flow structure and aerodynamics at different angles of attack. Finally, a comparative study is conducted between tuft velocity results and oil flow visualization experiments, as well as particle image velocimetry experiments, confirming the feasibility of the fluorescent tuft velocity measurement method.
RistićS. Flow visualisation techniques in wind tunnels Part I–Non optical methods. Scientific Technical Review2007; 57(1): 39–50.
2.
DuHZhangQLiQ, et al.Drag reduction in cylindrical wake flow using porous material. Phys Fluids2022; 34(4).
3.
OkadaMPinhoJCernatB, et al.A fluorescent PIV technique for turbomachinery flows. J Phys: Conf Ser2023; 2511: 012021.
4.
ShiSDingJAtkinsonC, et al.A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV. Exp Fluid2018; 59: 13.
5.
LiuTWoodigaSMaT. Skin friction topology in a region enclosed by penetrable boundary. Exp Fluids2011; 51: 1549–1562.
6.
MielkeAKlattDLeopoldF, et al.Advanced surface oil flow visualization technique applied to complex transonic flows for the verification of viscous effects in CFD. J Vis2023; 26: 131–141.
7.
LiuTSalazarDMCraftonJ, et al.Skin friction extracted from surface pressure in incident shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J2021; 59: 3910–3922.
8.
ZhaoJ. Measurement of wall shear stress in high speed air flow using shear-sensitive liquid crystal coating. Sensors2018; 18: 1605.
9.
GoesslingJFischerFSeumeJR, et al.Uncertainty and validation of unsteady pressure-sensitive paint measurements of acoustic fields under aero engine-like conditions. Exp Fluid2023; 64: 22.
10.
ChenLSuzukiTNonomuraT, et al.Flow visualization and transient behavior analysis of luminescent mini-tufts after a backward-facing step. Flow Meas Instrum2020; 71: 101657.
11.
Swytink-BinnemaNJohnsonDA. Digital tuft analysis of stall on operational wind turbines. Wind Energy2016; 19: 703–715.
12.
WieserDBonitzSNayeriC, et al.Quantitative tuft flow visualization on the volvo S60 under realistic driving conditions. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting; 2016-01, San Diego, California, USA, 2016.
13.
OmataNShirayamaS. Extracting quantitative three-dimensional unsteady flow direction from tuft flow visualizations. Fluid Dynam Res2017; 49: 055506.
14.
BirdJRileyDR. Some experiments on visualization of flow fields behind low-aspect-ratio wings by means of a tuft grid.
15.
CookSBarlowJ. Investigation of critical states of the F/A-18E in power approach configuration using mini-tuft flow visualization. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001.
16.
KarpovichEGueraicheDSergeevaN, et al.Investigation of a light boxplane model using tuft flow visualization and CFD. Fluid2021; 6: 451.
17.
ManolesosMVoutsinasSG. Geometrical characterization of stall cells on rectangular wings. Wind Energy2014; 17: 1301–1314.
18.
PrudhommeDChinDReederMF, et al.Flight tests of passive flow control for suppression of cavity aeroacoustics. J Aircraft2021; 58: 907–916.
19.
PowellKGMurmanEMWoodRM, et al.Comparison of experimental and numerical results for delta wings with vortex flaps. J Aircraft1988; 25: 405–412.
20.
DEL FrateJSaltzmanJ. In-flight flow visualization results from the X-29A aircraft at highangles of attack. In: 6th AIAA biennial flight test conference; 1992-08. Hilton Head, SC1992.
21.
SaidMImaiMMatS, et al.Tuft flow visualisation on UTM-LST VFE-2 delta wing model configuration at high angle of attacks. Int J Automot Mech Eng2020; 17: 8214–8223.
22.
SteinfurthBBertholdAFeldhusS, et al.Increasing the aerodynamic performance of a formula student race car by means of active flow control. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil2019; 1: 1265–1278.
23.
CaiCZuoZMaedaT, et al.Periodic and aperiodic flow patterns around an airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 115110.
24.
CaiCLiuSZuoZ, et al.Experimental and theoretical investigations on the effect of a single leading-edge protuberance on airfoil performance. Phys Fluids2019; 31.
25.
MuKZhanDLiZ, et al.Surface tuft flow visualization in a hypersonic inward turning inlet/isolator model. In: 21st AIAA international space planes and hypersonics technologies conference, Xiamen, China, 2017.
26.
MosharovVE. Luminescent methods for investigating surface gas flows (Review). Instrum Exp Tech2009; 52: 1–12.
27.
HuiZhouJDengL. Key technologies study of fluorescent mini-tuft application in the low-speed wind tunnel tests. ExpFluid Mech2015; 29(001): 92–96.
28.
SteinfurthBCuraCGehringJ, et al.Tuft deflection velocimetry: a simple method to extract quantitative flow field information. Exp Fluid2020; 61: 141.
29.
BonitzSWieserDBroniewiczA, et al.Experimental investigation of the near wall flow downstream of a passenger car wheel arch. SAE Int J Passeng Cars - Mech Syst2018; 11(1): 22–34.
30.
WieserDBonitzSLofdahlL, et al.Surface flow visualization on a full-scale passenger car with quantitative tuft image processing. In: SAE 2016 world congress and exhibition. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 2016.
31.
ChenLSuzukiTNonomuraT, et al.Characterization of luminescent mini-tufts in quantitative flow visualization experiments: surface flow analysis and modelization. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2019; 103: 406–417.
32.
SahooPKSoltaniSWongAKC. A survey of thresholding techniques. Comput Vis Graph Image Process1988; 41: 233–260.
33.
DudaROHartPE. Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun ACM1972; 15: 11–15.
34.
SteinfurthBCuraCGehringJ, et al.Tuft deflection velocimetry: a simple method to extract quantitative flow field information. Exp Fluids2020; 61(6): 146.
35.
VeySLangHMNayeriCN, et al.Extracting quantitative data from tuft flow visualizations on utility scale wind turbines. J Phys: Conf Ser2014; 524: 012011.
