Capturing noncooperative targets in space has garnered continuous research interest in aerospace applications. This study addresses the demands of large-scale, multifaceted activities and varied working conditions for space capture missions by designing a space capture robot composed of multiple cable-driven manipulators operating in parallel. First, single- and multi-segment cable-driven robot models were designed, and a geometric model was subsequently built. The optimal number of segments was determined by analysing the condition number of a Jacobian matrix using the Monte Carlo method. Subsequently, based on the constant-curvature assumption, a kinematic model of the cable-driven space capture robot was formulated, and capture methods for different capture targets were designed using the Monte Carlo method. Finally, an eight-segment cable-driven robot prototype was developed, and compliance and driving experiments were conducted. This robot exhibits promising application potential for space noncooperative target capture and can be feasibly manufactured using on-orbit 3D machining technology.
ShanMGuoJGillE. Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods. Prog Aero Sci2016; 80: 18–32.
2.
ZhangXLiuJFengJ, et al.Effective capture of nongraspable objects for space robots using geometric cage pairs. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron2020; 25(1): 95–107.
3.
PolitesME. Technology of automated rendezvous and capture in space. J Spacecraft Rockets1999; 36(2): 280–291.
4.
JaekelSLamparielloRRacklW, et al.Design and operational elements of the robotic subsystem for the e. deorbit debris removal mission. Front Robot AI2018; 5(100): 1–20.
5.
BiesbroekRInnocentiLWolahanA, et al.Deorbit-ESA’s active debris removal mission. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on space debris, Darmstadt, 17–21 April, 2017.
6.
TarabiniLGilJGandiaF, et al.Ground guided CX-OLEV rendezvous with uncooperative geostationary satellite. Acta Astronaut2007; 61(6): 312–325.
7.
KaiserCSjöbergFDelcuraJM, et al.SMART-OLEV—an orbital life extension vehicle for servicing commercial spacecrafts in GEO. Acta Astronaut2008; 63(64): 400–410.
HirzingerGLandzettelKBrunnerB, et al.DLR's robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing. Adv Robot2012; 18(2): 139–174.
10.
DebusTDoughertyS. Overview and performance of the front-end robotics enabling near-term demonstration (FREND) robotic arm. In: Aerospace conference & AIAA unmanned unlimited conference,Washington, Jun 2012.
11.
MazanekDDMerrillRGBelbinSP, et al.Asteroid redirect robotic mission: robotic boulder capture option overview. In: AIAA space 2014 conference and exposition,San Diego, 2014.
12.
NakasukaSFunaneTNakamuraY, et al.Sounding rocket flight experiment for demonstrating “Furoshiki Satellite” for large phased array antenna. Acta Astronaut2006; 59(5): 200–205.
13.
AxthelmRKlotzBRetatI, et al.Net capture mechanism for debris removal demonstration mission. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on space debris, Darmstadt, Germany, April 2017.
14.
St-OngeDSharfISagnièresL, et al.A deployable mechanism concept for the collection of small-to-medium-size space debris. Adv Space Res2018; 61(5): 1286–1297.
15.
SandsT. Optimization provenance of whiplash compensation for flexible space robotics. Aerospace2019; 6(93): 1–7.
16.
SandsT. Flattening the curve of flexible space robotics. Appl Sci2022; 12: 1–5.
17.
SorensenK.Conceptual design and analysis of an MXER tether boost station. In: 37th joint propulsion conference & exhibit,Salt Lake City, Aug 2012.
18.
LiLXieFWangT, et al.Stiffness-Tunable soft gripper with soft-rigid hybrid actuation for versatile manipulations. Soft Rob2022; 9(6): 1108–1119.
19.
ZhaoCGuoHLiuR, et al.Design and kinematic analysis of a 3RRlS metamorphic parallel mechanism for large-scale reconfigurable space multifingered hand. J Mech Robot2018; 10(4): 041012.
20.
ZhaoCGuoHZhangD, et al.Stiffness modeling of n (3RRlS) reconfigurable series-parallel manipulators by combining virtual joint method and matrix structural analysis. Mech Mach Theory2020; 152(10): 103960.
21.
QiaoSGuoHLiuR, et al.Self-adaptive grasp process and equilibrium configuration analysis of a 3-DOF UACT robotic finger. Mech Mach Theory2019; 133(3): 250–266.
22.
QiaoSWangYGuoHet al.Pre-bending motion strategy analysis of a 3-DOF UACT robotic finger. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2021 International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, 17–19 August2021.
23.
QiaoSZhangLLiB, et al.Coupled bending inwards motion and control strategy analysis of a cable-driven underactuated finger. IEEE Access2021; 9: 133902–133913.
24.
GaoCHuangHLiB, et al.Design of a truss-shaped deployable grasping mechanism using mobility bifurcation. Mech Mach Theory2019; 139(4): 346–358.
25.
LiGHuangHGuoH, et al.Dynamic modeling and control for a deployable grasping manipulator. IEEE Access2019; 7: 23000–23011.
26.
LiuZCaiZPengH, et al.Morphology and tension perception of cable-driven continuum robots. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron2022: 1–12.
27.
KimYParadaGALiuS, et al.Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Sci Robot2019; 4(33): 7329.
28.
YangZYangLXuL, et al.A continuum robot with twin-pivot structure: the kinematics and shape estimation. Int Conf on Intell Robot & Appl2021; 13012: 466–475.
29.
GraziosoSDi GironimoGSicilianoB. A geometrically exact model for soft continuum robots: the finite element deformation space formulation. Soft Robot2019; 6(6): 790–811.
