In this study, the injection of Halon 1301, an effective fire-suppressing agent, into a helicopter engine nacelle is modelled to provide insights into dispersion behaviour alongside complex flow physics. The injection velocity as well as the mass flow rate were retrieved via a 1-D pipe model to simulate nitrogen-pressurized flow of Halon 1301 in a four-branch pipe system. The Discrete Phase Model in ANSYS Fluent was then used to model the injection of Halon 1301 into an engine nacelle. To simulate engine operation conditions in forward flight and hover regime, external boundary conditions were prescribed to the pressure inlets in the nacelle. When Halon 1301 is injected into the engine bay via the first pair of injection points, the droplets immediately reach their boiling point of 215 K. This resulted in an explosive-dispersion behaviour with a cone angle in the range of 80°–90°. As the agent evaporates, the engine cools and another pair of injection points located at the rear of the engine is subsequently activated, helping to cool the engine further. The two flight regimes considered, namely, hover and forward flight, showed contrast in flow dynamics which affected the cooling of the engine as well as the spray dynamics. In particular, the forward flight case showed more recirculation zones compared to the hover case. The volume concentrations of Halon 1301 were plotted for 11 probe points within the nacelle, and it was observed that two locations showed traces of low concentration levels.
ZhuangLLuSXSunZY, et al.Study of flame height of aviation fuel pool fires. J Univ Sci Technol Chn2009; 7: 763.
2.
HurleyMJ. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2015.
3.
IngersonDA. Simulating the distribution of Halon 1301 in an aircraft engine nacelle with HFC-125. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service., 1999.
4.
TapscottRESpeitelLC. Options to the use of halons for aircraft fire suppression systems-2002 update. Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center, 2002.
5.
PayriRGimenoJMartí-AldaravíP, et al.Parametrical study of the dispersion of an alternative fire suppression agent through a real-size extinguisher system nozzle under realistic aircraft cargo cabin conditions. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 141: 110–122.
6.
ElliottDGGarrisonPWKleinGA, et al.Flow of nitrogen-pressurized Halon 1301 in fire extinguishing systems. Pasadena, CA: JPL Publication 84–62, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1984.
7.
DiNennoPJForssellEWFerreiraMJ, et al.Modeling of the Flow Properties and Discharge of Halon Replacement Agents. In Proccedings on Halon Options Technical Working Conference, 1994. 3rd -5th May 1994, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
8.
AmatriainARubioGParraI, et al.Mathematical modeling of nitrogen-pressurized Halon flow in fire extinguishing systems. Fire Saf J2021; 122: 103356.
9.
SnegirevALipjainenABondarenkoD, et al.Transient spray development in the discharge of a fire extinguishing agent. In: Proceeding of the sixth international seminar on fire and explosion hazards (FEH6), January 2011:University of Leeds. Leeds, UK.
10.
KurokawaFYde AndradeCRZaparoliEL. Modeling of aircraft fire suppression system by the lumped parameter approach. Aircraft Eng Aerospace Tech2016; 88(4): 535–539.
11.
ZaparoliE.Numerical simulation of an aircraft cargo compartment fire suppression system using CFD tool. In: Proceedings of the 19th international congress of mechanical engineering,Gramado, Brazil, 2009, pp. 15–20. 5th - 9thNovember2007.
12.
LiQLiZChenR, et al.Numerical study on effects of pipeline geometric parameters on release characteristics of gas extinguishing agent. Symmetry2021; 13(10): 1766.
13.
HewsonJTieszenSSundbergW, et al.CFD modeling of fire suppression and its role in optimizing suppressant distribution. In: Proceedings of the Halon options technical conference, 2003.
14.
WangLWangZQCuiJ, et al.Protein changes in Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae in vitro induced by bovine bile. Vet Parasitol2013; 194(1): 164–167.
15.
ColebrookCFWhiteCM. Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci1937; 161(906): 367–381.
16.
ChenNH. An explicit equation for friction factor in pipe. Ind Eng Chem Fund1979; 18(3): 296–297.
17.
Müller-SteinhagenHHeckK. A simple friction pressure drop correlation for two-phase flow in pipes. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif1986; 20(6): 297–308.
18.
Ortiz-VidalLEMureithiNRodriguezOMH. Two-phase friction factor in gas-liquid pipe flow. Rev de Eng Térmica2014; 13(2): 81–88.
19.
ShannakBA. Frictional pressure drop of gas liquid two-phase flow in pipes. Nucl Eng Des2008; 238(12): 3277–3284.
20.
HicksTG. Handbook of mechanical engineering calculations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2006.
21.
YuanCWangYLiH, et al.Simulation study of filling conditions for aircraft fire suppression systems. In: CSAA/IET international conference on aircraft utility systems, 2022. 17-20 August 2022,Nanchang, China.
22.
FluentA. Ansys fluent theory guide. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS Inc, 2021, 15317, pp. 724–746.
23.
NovozhilovV. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of compartment fires. Prog Energy Combust Sci2001; 27(6): 611–666.
24.
JinJPanRLiQ, et al.Effects of release pressure on the transportation characteristics in pipeline and the diffusion behaviors in enclosure space of typical gas extinguishing agent. J Loss Prev Process Ind2021; 70: 104441.
25.
RanzREMarshallWR. Vaporization from drops, part i-ii. Chem Eng Prog1952; 48(3): 141–180.
26.
HaenleinA. Disintegration of a liquid jet. Washington, DC: NASA Tech Memorandum, 1932, 659.
27.
LefebvreAHMcDonellVG. Atomization and sprays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press, 2017.
28.
Di NicolaGDi NicolaCMoglieM. A new surface tension equation for refrigerants. Int J Thermophys2013; 34(12): 2243–2260.
29.
LechnerMDWohlfarthCWohlfarthB. Surface tension of pure liquids and binary liquid mixtures. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2015.
30.
LiuSXieYChenM, et al.Prediction of the release process of the nitrogen-extinguishant binary mixture considering surface tension. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 145: 185–199.
31.
LeeMJTienDLShaoCT. Thermophysical capability of ozone-safe working fluids for an organic Rankine cycle system. Heat Recovery Syst CH1993; 13(5): 409–418.
32.
RosinPRammlerE. The laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. J Ins Fuels1933; 7: 29–36.
33.
RoachePJ. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Albuquerque, NM: Hermosa, 1998, 895.
34.
RuithM.Unstructured multiplex rotor source model with thrust and moment trimming-Fluent’s VBM model. In: 23rd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference,2005, p. 5217. 6 June 2005 to 9 June 2005,Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
35.
FinnertyAEPereginoPJVande KieftLJ, et al.Fires experienced and halon 1301 fire suppression systems in current WeaponSystems. Report SURVIAC TR-00-007. Washington, DC: United States Air Force – Air Force Research Laboratory – Survivability and Safety Branch, 2003.
36.
European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large rotorcraft. CS-29 Amendment 7. Cologne, Germany: European Union Aviation Safety Agency. 2019.
37.
FerrareseJA. General guidelines for measuring fire-extinguishing agent concentrations in powerplant compartments. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1977.
38.
LeeJ. Simulation method for the fire suppression process inside the engine core and APU compartments. In: The fourth triennial international aircraft fire and cabin safety research conference, Portugal, 2004: Citeseer.
