Rotor blades experience unsteady forces and aerodynamic losses when operating in a distorted inflow. The structural analysis of rotors under these conditions, therefore, is of prime importance during the early design phase. This work introduces a computationally efficient design framework that links the aerodynamic design and structural analysis of the rotor. Rotor structural analysis comprises computing dynamic stresses, the excitation frequencies, and resonance margins at various modes of vibration. A design space encapsulating fan stage design variables, aerodynamic performance, and rotor structural constraints is explored and optimized for maximum fan stage efficiency subject to aerodynamic and structural constraints.
Arnaldo ValdesRMBurmaogluSTucciV, et al.Flight path 2050 and acare goals for maintaining and extending industrial leadership in aviation: a map of the aviation technology space. Sustainability2019; 11(7): 2065. DOI: 10.3390/su11072065.
3.
UrangaADrelaMGreitzerEM, et al.Boundary layer ingestion benefit of the d8 transport aircraft. AIAA J2017; 55(11): 3693–3708. DOI: 10.2514/1.J055755.
4.
AshcraftSWPadronASPascioniKA, et al.Review of propulsion technologies for n+ 3 subsonic vehicle concepts. Technical report. Washington, DC: NASA, 2011.
5.
WelsteadJFelderJL. Conceptual design of a single-aisle turboelectric commercial transport with fuselage boundary layer ingestion. In: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, CA, 4–8 January 2016, p. 1027. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-1027.
6.
WiartLAtinaultOGrenonR, et al.Development of nova aircraft configurations for large engine integration studies. In: 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Dallas, TX, 22–26 June 2015, p. 2254. DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2254.
7.
SmithARobertsHE. The jet airplane utilizing boundary layer air for propulsion. J Aeronaut Sci1947; 14(2): 97–109. DOI: 10.2514/8.1273.
8.
GearhartWSHendersonRE. Selection of a propulsor for a submersible system. J Aircraft1966; 3(1): 84–90. DOI: 10.2514/3.59270.
9.
WislicenusGF. Hydrodynamics and propulsion of submerged bodies. ARS J1960; 30(12): 1140–1148. DOI: 10.2514/8.5351.
10.
LiuYElhamAHorstP, et al.Exploring vehicle level benefits of revolutionary technology progress via aircraft design and optimization. Energies2018; 11(1): 166. DOI: 10.3390/en11010166.
11.
DoulgerisGKhaleghiHKalfasA, et al.Development of a method for enhanced fan representation in gas turbine modeling. Int J Rotating Mach2011; 2011: 1–8. DOI: 10.1155/2011/182906.
12.
GladinJC. A sizing and vehicle matching methodology for boundary layer ingesting propulsion systems. PhD Thesis. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2015.
13.
PokhrelMGladinJGarciaE, et al.A methodology for quantifying distortion impacts using a modified parallel compressor theory. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Oslo, Norway, 11–15 June 2018. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. DOI: 10.1115/GT2018-77089.
14.
MarienTWelsteadJRJonesSM. Vehicle level system impact of boundary layer ingestion for the nasa d8 concept aircraft. In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, 8–12 January 2018, p. 0271. DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-0271.
BenichouEDufourGBousquetY, et al.Body force modeling of the aerodynamics of a low-speed fan under distorted inflow. Int J Turbomach Propuls Power2019; 4(3): 29. DOI: 10.3390/ijtpp4030029.
18.
MaoYDangTQ. A three-dimensional body-force model for nacelle-fan systems under inlet distortions. Aerosp Sci Technol2020; 106: 106085. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106085.
19.
HendricksES. A multi-level multi-design point approach for gas turbine cycle and turbine conceptual design. PhD Thesis. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2017.
20.
TambeSBartolomé OsegueraURaoAG. Performance of a low speed axial fan under distortion: an experimental investigation. In: Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air, Vol. 84065, p. V02AT32A040. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. DOI: 10.1115/GT2020-14956.
21.
ProvenzaAJDuffyKPBakhleMA. Aeromechanical response of a distortion-tolerant boundary layer ingesting fan. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2019; 141(1): 011011. DOI: 10.1115/1.4040739.
22.
BakhleMReddyTHerrickG, et al.Aeromechanics analysis of a boundary layer ingesting fan. In: 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Atlanta, GA, 30 July–01 August 2012, p. 3995. DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-3995.
23.
BakhleMAReddyTSCoroneosR, et al.Aeromechanics analysis of a distortion-tolerant fan with boundary layer ingestion. In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, 8–12 January 2018, p. 1891. DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1891.
24.
MinJBReddyTSBakhleMA, et al.Cyclic symmetry finite element forced response analysis of a distortion tolerant fan with boundary layer ingestion. In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, 8–12 January 2018, p. 1890. DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1890.
25.
VahdatiMLeeKBSureshkumarP. A review of computational aeroelasticity of civil fan blades. Int J Gas Turbine Propuls Power Syst2020; 11(4): 22–35. DOI: 10.38036/jgpp.11.4_22.
26.
CumpstyNGreitzerE. Ideas and methods of turbomachinery aerodynamics: a historical view. J Propuls Power2004; 20(1): 15–26. DOI: 10.2514/1.9176.
27.
HodgesDH. Nonlinear composite beam theory. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006.
28.
PokhrelMGladinJMavrisD, et al.An approach for fan stage conceptual design with non-axisymmetric stators in presence of distortion. In: AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, 15–19 June 2020. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-2643.
29.
CartaFO. Analysis of unsteady aerodynamic effects on an axial-flow compressor stage with distorted inflow. Technical report. Lafayette, LA: Purdue Univ Lafayette in Project Squid Headquarters, 1972.
30.
PokhrelM. A framework for fan stage conceptual design under distortion induced by boundary layer ingestion. PhD Thesis. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2020.
31.
CesnikCEHodgesDH. Vabs: a new concept for composite rotor blade cross-sectional modeling. J Am Helicop Soc1997; 42(1): 27–38. DOI: 10.4050/JAHS.42.27.
32.
YuWHodgesDHHoJC. Variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis – an updated version. Int J Eng Sci2012; 59: 40–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.03.006.
33.
HodgesDH. Geometrically exact, intrinsic theory for dynamics of curved and twisted anisotropic beams. AIAA J2003; 41(6): 1131–1137. DOI: 10.2514/2.2054.
34.
GuptaMSarkarKHodgesDH. 3-d stress-strain histories for composite beams in nonlinear transient structural analysis. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, 7–11 January 2019, p. 1026. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-1026.
35.
PaganiAPetroloMColonnaG, et al.Dynamic response of aerospace structures by means of refined beam theories. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 46: 360–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.08.005.
36.
CarreraEGiuntaGNaliP, et al.Refined beam elements with arbitrary cross-section geometries. Comput Struct2010; 88(5–6): 283–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.002.
37.
FilippiMPaganiACarreraE. Accurate nonlinear dynamics and mode aberration of rotating blades. J Appl Mech2018; 85(11): 111004. DOI: 10.1115/1.4040693.
38.
BlasquesJPAA. User’s Manual for BECAS: a cross section analysis tool for anisotropic and inhomogeneous beam sections of arbitrary geometry. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø DTU National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, 2012.
39.
BlasquesJBitscheRDFedorovV, et al.Accuracy of an efficient framework for structural analysis of wind turbine blades. Wind Energy2016; 19(9): 1603–1621. DOI: 10.1002/we.1939.
40.
YuW. VABS manual for users, 2011.
41.
YuW. GEBT manual for users, 2011.
42.
GuptaMPokhrelMMavrisDN, et al.Application of variational asymptotic method for structural analysis of fan rotor blades in boundary layer ingesting flow field. In: AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum, Orlando, FL, 6–10 January 2020. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-0133.
43.
Meher-HomjiCBGabrilesGGas turbine blade failures-causes, avoidance, and troubleshooting. In: Proceedings of the 27th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, September 1998. Texas A&M University. Turbomachinery Laboratories. DOI: 10.21423/R1RD4R.
44.
HallidayDResnickRWalkerJ. Fundamentals of physics extended. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
45.
CousinsWTVoytovychDTillmanG, et al.Design of a distortion-tolerant fan for a boundary-layer ingesting embedded engine application. In: 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Atlanta, GA, 10–12 July 2017, p. 5042. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-5042.
46.
PlasACrichtonDSargeantM, et al.Performance of a boundary layer ingesting (bli) propulsion system. In: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 8 January–11 January 2007, p. 450. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-450.
47.
YaoJGorrellSEWadiaAR. High-fidelity numerical analysis of per-rev-type inlet distortion transfer in multistage fans—part i: simulations with selected blade rows. J Turbomach2010; 132(4). DOI: 10.1115/1.3148478.
48.
GiulianiJE. Jet engine fan response to inlet distortions generated by ingesting boundary layer flow. PhD Thesis. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 2016.
49.
FerrarAM. Measurements of flow in boundary layer ingesting serpentine inlets. PhD Thesis. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, 2011.
50.
SimpsonTWPoplinskiJKochPN, et al.Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput2001; 17(2): 129–150. DOI: 10.1007/PL00007198.
51.
QueipoNVHaftkaRTShyyW, et al.Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci2005; 41(1): 1–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001.
52.
AvcarMSapliogluK. An artificial neural network application for estimation of natural frequencies of beams. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl2015; 6(6): 94–102. DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2015.060614.
53.
BaoYLiuDTangZ, et al.Machine-learning-based methods for output only structural modal identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:200407644, 2020.
