Nonlinear combustion instability analysis of a bluff body burner based on the flame describing function

Abstract

Lean premixed combustion is a common form of combustion organization in power equipment and propulsion systems. In order to understand the dynamic characteristics of lean premixed flame and predict and control its combustion instability, it is necessary to obtain its flame describing function (FDF). Based on the open source CFD toolbox, OpenFOAM, the dynamic K-equation model, and the finite rate Partially Stirred Reactor (PaSR) model were used to perform large eddy simulations (LES) of lean premixed combustion, and the response of the unsteady heat release rate to single-frequency harmonic disturbances was studied. The response of the unsteady heat release rate was characterized by the FDF, and the response of the unsteady heat release rate to the two-frequency harmonic disturbance was studied. The results show that the quantitative heat release rate response and flame dynamics have very proper accuracy. In the single-frequency harmonic disturbance, as the forcing frequency increases, the curling behavior of the flame surface and the instantaneous vortex structure change; the nonlinear kinematics effect is manifested by the entrainment of the vortex. At lower forcing frequencies, the heat release response changes linearly with the increase of forcing amplitude; at intermediate frequencies, the heat release response exhibits obvious nonlinear behavior; at high frequencies, the heat release response to amplitude changes decreases. The introduction of the second harmonic disturbance will significantly reduce the response range of the total heat release rate and make the combustion more stable.

Keywords

OpenFOAM large eddy simulation combustion instability flame describing function

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pisciuneri

Yilmaz

Strakey

, et al. Massively parallel FDF simulation of turbulent reacting flows [M]. Springer, Stochastic Equations for Complex Systems: Theoretical and Computational Topics 2015; 2015: 175–192.

George

McLaughlin . Thermoacoustic oscillations in combustion chambers of gas turbines [J]. AIAA J 1995; 33(12): 2280–2287.

Ayoola

Balachandran

Frank

, et al. Spatially resolved heat release rate measurements in turbulent premixed flames [J]. Combustion and Flame 2006; 144(1/2): 1–16.

Taamallah

Vogiatzaki

Alzahrani

, et al. Fuel flexibility, stability and emissions in premixed hydrogen-rich gas turbine combustion: Technology, fundamentals, and numerical simulations [J]. Appl Energ 2015; 154(15): 1020–1047.

Noiray

Durox

Schuller

, et al. A unified framework for nonlinear combustion instability analysis based on the flame describing function [J]. J Fluid Mech 2008; 615: 139–167.

Durox

Schuller

Noiray

, et al. Experimental analysis of nonlinear flame transfer functions for different flame geometries [J]. Proc Combustion Inst 2009; 32(1): 1391–1398.

Bellows

Bobba

Seitzman

, et al. Nonlinear flame transfer function characteristics in a swirl-stabilized combustor [J]. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2007; 129(4): 823–833.

Balachandran

Dowling

Mastorakos

. Non-linear response of turbulent premixed flames to imposed inlet velocity oscillations of two frequencies [J]. Flow Turbul Combust 2008; 80(4): 455.

Balachandran . Experimental Investigation of the Response of Turbulent Premixed Flames to Acoustic Oscillations [D]. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, 2005.

10.

Palies

Schuller

Durox

, et al. Acoustically perturbed turbulent premixed swirling flames [J]. Phys Fluids 2011; 23(3): 193–201.

11.

Palies

Schuller

Durox

, et al. Modeling of premixed swirling flames transfer functions [J]. Proc Combust Inst 2011; 33(2): 2967–2974.

12.

Silva

Nicoud

Schuller

, et al. Combining a Helmholtz solver with the flame describing function to assess combustion instability in a premixed swirled combustor. J Combust Flame 2013; 160: 1743–1754.

13.

Bellows

Neumeier

Lieuwen

. Forced response of a swirling, premixed flame to flow disturbances [J]. J Propuls Power 2006; 22(5): 1075–1084.

14.

Schimek

Moeck

Paschereit

. An Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of an Atmospheric Swirl-Stabilized Premixed flame[C]. New York, USA: ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea and Air, 2011.

15.

Durox

Schuller

Noiray

, et al. The Rayleigh criterion and the acoustic energy balance in unconfined self-excited oscillating flames [J]. Combust Flame 2010; 156(1): 106–119.

16.

Ayoola

Hartung

Armitage

, et al. Temperature response of turbulent premixed flames to inlet velocity oscillations [J]. Exp Fluids 2009; 46(1): 27.

17.

Febrer

Yang

Mcguirk

. A hybrid approach for coupling of acoustic wave effects and incompressible LES of reacting flows [C]. New York, USA: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 2011.

18.

Han

Morgans

. Simulation of the flame describing function of a turbulent premixed flame using an open-source LES solver [J]. Combust Flame 2015; 162(5): 1778–1792.

19.

Han

Morgans

. Prediction of combustion instability limit cycle oscillations by combining flame describing function simulations with a thermoacoustic network model [J]. Combust Flame 2015; 162(10): 3632–3647.

20.

Han

Yang

Mao

. LES investigation of two frequency effects on acoustically forced premixed flame [J]. Fuel 2016; 185: 449–459.

21.

Palies

Durox

Schuller

, et al. Nonlinear combustion instability analysis based on the flame describing function applied to turbulent premixed swirling flames [J]. Combust Flame 2011; 158(10): 1980–1991.

22.

Campa

Juniper

. Obtaining Bifurcation Diagrams with a Thermoacoustic Network Model [C]. New York, USA: ASME Turbo Expo 2012. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2012.

23.

Yang

Guo

. Analytic study on combustion instability with a thermoacoustic network model [J]. J Propuls Techn 2014; 35(6): 822–829.

24.

Xia

Verma

Zore

, et al. AIAA-2020-0175 SBES/FGM Simulation of Forced Response of a Premixed Blu-Body Stabilized Flame [C]. New York, USA: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020.

25.

Balusamy

LKB

Han

, et al. Nonlinear dynamics of a self-excited thermoacoustic system subjected to acoustic forcing [J]. Proc Combust Inst 2015; 35(3): 3229–3236.

26.

OpenFOAM. The open source CFD toolbox. Available at: https://www.openfoam.org (2019.10).

27.

Shahsavari

Farshchi

. Large eddy simulation of low swirl flames under external flow excitations [J]. Flow Turb Combust 2018; 100(1): 249–269.

28.

Germano

Piomelli

Moin

, et al. A dynamic sub⁃ grid-scale eddy viscosity model [J]. Phys Fluids 1991; 3(3): 1760–1765.

29.

Poinsot

Veynante

. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion [M]. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Edwards, 2012.

30.

Berglund

Fedina

Fureby

, et al. Finite rate chemistry large-eddy simulation of self-ignition in supersonic combustion ramjet [J]. AIAA J 2010; 48(3): 540–550.

31.

Fedina

Fureby

. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for an axisymmetric dump combustor [J]. J Turb 2011; 12(24): 1–20.

32.

Sabelnikov

Fureby

. Extended LES-PaSR model for simulation of turbulent combustion [J]. Prog Propuls Phys 2013; 4: 539–568.

33.

Tay-Wo-Chong

Polifke

. Large eddy simulation-based study of the influence of thermal boundary condition and combustor confinement on premix flame transfer functions [J]. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2012; 135(2): 021502.

34.

Mejia

Selle

Bazile

, et al. Wall-temperature effects on flame response to acoustic oscillations [J]. Proc Combust Inst 2015; 35(3): 3201–3208.

35.

Palies

Durox

Schuller

, et al. Nonlinear combustion instability analysis based on the flame describing function applied to turbulent premixed swirling flames [J]. Combust Flame 2011; 158(10): 1980–1991.

36.

Durox

Moeck

Bourgouin

, et al. Flame dynamics of a variable swirl number system and instability control [J]. Combust Flame 2013; 160(9): 1729–1742.

37.

Zhou

Wyganski

. The reponse of a mixing layer formed between parallel streams to a concomitant excitation at two frequencies [J]. J Fluid Mech 2001; 441: 139–168.

38.

Candel

. Combustion dynamics and control: Progress and challenges [J]. Proc Combust Inst 2002; 29(1): 1–28.