Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A computational study on the performance of mixed compression supersonic air intake has been carried out with and without air jet at various operating conditions. Commercially available software ANSYS was used and K-ω SST turbulence model was selected to capture the turbulent flow inside the air intake. All the simulations were simulated at a design Mach number of 2.2. Two Air jet of 1 mm diameter each and perpendicular to the local ramp surface have been placed in longitudinal direction at 0.47 times the total length of the air intake. Effect of variation of injection pressure on the flow field of air intake has been studied. Injection pressure has been varied with respect to the free stream pressure. Four different cases of injection pressure have been investigated. Three different positions (1.far away before the air jet, 2. immediately after the air jet and 3. far away behind the air jet) of normal shock were simulated to study the effect of air jet by varying the back pressure of the supersonic air intake. Significant reduction in the flow separation due the normal shock wave was noticed for all the cases of injection pressure, which further helps in improving the performance of the supersonic air intake. Important performance parameters such as flow distortion, mass flow ratio and total pressure recovery were calculated to measure the efficacy of supersonic air intake with air jet at various operating conditions.

Keywords

Supersonic air intake air jet injection pressure performance parameters SWBLI control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Das

Prasad

. Starting characteristics of a rectangular supersonic air-intake with cowl deflection. Aeronaut J 2010; 114: 177–189.

Soltani

Sepahi Younsi

Daliri

. Performance investigation of a supersonic air intake in the presence of the boundary layer suction. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 229: 1495–1509.

Soltani

Younsi

Farahani

, et al. Numerical simulation and parametric study of a supersonic intake. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2013; 227: 467–479.

Das

Prasad

. Unstart suppression and performance analysis of supersonic air-intake adopting bleed and cowl bending. J Inst Eng Aerosp Eng J 2010; 91: 27–35.

Délery

Dussauge

. Some physical aspects of shock wave/boundary layer interactions. Shock Waves 2009; 19: 453–468.

Gnani

Zare-Behtash

Kontis

. Pseudo-shock waves and their interactions in high-speed intakes. Prog Aerosp Sci 2016; 82: 36–56.

Sepahi-younsi

Feshalami

. Performance Evaluation of External and Mixed Compression Supersonic Air Intakes : Parametric Study. J Aerosp Eng 2019; 32: 1–14.

Moghaddam

Neishabouri

. On the active and passive flow separation control techniques over airfoils. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2017; 248: 012009.

Wallis RA and Stuart BA. On the control of shock-induced boundary layer separation with discrete air jets. Aeronautical Research Council 1962; C. P. No. 595: 1–37.

10.

Dickmann

. Shock/boundary-layer interaction effects on transverse jets in crossflow over a flat plate. J Spacecr Rockets 2009; 46: 1132–1141.

11.

Johnston

Nishi

. Vortex generator jets—means for flow separation control. AIAA J 1990; 28: 989–994.

12.

Kumar

Alvi

. Use of high-speed microjets for active separation control in diffusers. AIAA J 2006; 44: 273–281.

13.

Chidambaranathan

Verma

Rathakrishnan

. Control of incident shock-induced boundary-layer separation using steady micro-jet actuators at M∞ = 3.5. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2019; 233: 1284–1306.

14.

Vaisakh

Muruganandam

. Influence of multi-wall separation control on normal-shock-induced separation in supersonic duct flows. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2019; 233: 3184–3192.

15.

Ramaswamy

Schreyer

. Effect of jet spacing in separation control with air jet vortex generators. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. AIAA 2019-1653. DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-1653.

16.

Ramaswamy DP, Hinke R, and Schreyer AM. (2020) Influence of Jet Spacing and Injection Pressure on Separation Control with Air-Jet Vortex Generators. In: Dillmann A, Heller G, Krämer E, Wagner C, Tropea C, and Jakirlić S (eds) New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XII. DGLR 2018. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 142. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25253-3_23.

17.

Khobragade

Wylie

Gustavsson

, et al. Control of flow separation in a rocket nozzle using microjets. New Sp 2019; 7: 31–42.

18.

Neale

Lamb

. Tests with a variable ramp intake having corn bined external/internal compression, and a design Mach number of 2.2. Aeronaut Reasearch Counc 1962; 1–35.

19.

Coratekin

Van Keuk

Ballmann

, et al. AIAA 99-2667 preliminary. lnvestigations in 2D and 3d ramjet inlet design. AIAA 1999; 99: 1–11.

20.

Wang

Tian

Cheng

, et al. Numerical analysis of pseudo-shock flow diffusion phenomenon in variable cross-section ducts. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222: 1109–1121.

21.

Askari

Soltani

Mostoufi

, et al. Angle of attack investigations on the performance of a diverterless supersonic inlet. J Appl Fluid Mech 2019; 12: 2017–2030.

22.

Askari

Solani

. Effects of Mach number on the performance of a diverterless supersonic inlet. J Aircr 2019; 56: 1697–1707.

23.

Das

Prasad

. Cowl deflection angle in a supersonic air intake. Def Sci J 2009; 59: 99–105.

Effect of air jet with injection pressure on the performance of mixed compression air intake

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References