Experimental studies on open cavity flows at supersonic speed of M = 2.0 were carried out. Oil flow visualization tests were made to understand the steady features of the surface flow field. Unsteady pressure measurements were done at five locations inside the cavity and pressure spectrum of these measurements were obtained. Cavity floor was made inclined to influence the flow directing towards the cavity leading edge with both, a favourable and adverse slope, by giving a positive and negative inclination angles to the floor, respectively. It is observed that the negative inclinations to the cavity floor behaves in a similar way to the base cavity, but a positive inclination helps to reduce the fluctuating pressures by 80% and reduce OASPL to the order of 14 dB and more.
WangZSunMWangH, et al. Mixing-related low frequency oscillation of combustion in an ethylene-fueled supersonic combustor. Proc Combust Inst2015; 35: 2137–2144.
2.
SunMGongCZhangSP, et al. Spark ignition process in a scramjet combustor fueled by hydrogen and equipped with multi-cavities at Mach 4 flight condition. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2012; 43: 90–96.
3.
CaiZYangYSunM, et al. Experimental investigation on ignition schemes of a supersonic combustor with the rearwall-expansion cavity. Acta Astronaut2016; 123: 181–187.
4.
SunMWangZLiangJ, et al. Flame characteristics in supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholder. J Propuls Power2008; 24: 688–696.
Yu K, Wilson KJ and Schadow KC. Effect of Flame-Holding Cavities on Supersonic Combustion Performance. In: 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Los Angeles, California, 20–24 June 1999.
7.
Webb N and Samimy M. Shock-trapping capability of a cavity in a supersonic flow. In: 46th AIAA plasmadynamics and lasers conference, Dallas, TX, 22–26 June 2015.
8.
Cattafesta LN, ShukIa D, Garg S, et al. Developement of an adaptive weapon-bay suppression system. In: 5th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Bellevue, WA, USA,10–12 May 1999.
9.
Bower WW, Kibens V, Cary AW, et al. High-frequency excitation active flow control for high-speed weapon release (HIFEX). In: 2nd AIAA flow control conference, Portland, Oregon, 28 June-1 July 2004.
10.
Wilcox FJ and Stallings RL. Experimental cavity pressure distributions at supersonic speeds. NASA Tech. Pap 2683, 1987.
11.
Tracy MB, Plentovich EB, Hemsch MJ, et al. Effect of sweep on cavity flow fields at subsonic and transonic speeds. NASA TM-217577, 2012.
12.
Krishnamurty K. Acoustic radiation from two-dimensional rectangular cutouts in aerodynamic surfaces. NACA Tech. note, no. TN-3487, 1955.
13.
SarohiaV. Experimental investigation of oscillations in flows over shallow cavities. AIAA1977; 15: 984–991.
14.
Sun Y, Zhang Y, Taira K, et al. Width and sidewall effects on high speed cavity flows. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, San Diego, California, USA, 4–8 January 2016.
15.
BereshSJWagnerJLHenflingJF, et al. Width effects in transonic flow over a rectangular cavity. AIAA2015; 53: 3831–3835.
16.
PowellA. On the edgetone. J Acoust Soc Am1961; 33: 395–409.
17.
Rossiter JE. Wind-tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Aeronaut. Res. Counc. Reports Memo., no. TR-3438, 1964.
Heller H and Bliss D. The physical mechanism of flow-induced pressure fluctuations in cavities and concepts for their suppression. In: 2nd Aeroacoustic Conference, AIAA, Hampton, VA, USA, 24–26 March 1975.
20.
WangHWangZSunM, et al. Large eddy simulation of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor with dual cavity. Acta Astronaut2015; 108: 119–128.
21.
LuWZhansenQLiangjieG. Numerical study of the combustion field in dual-cavity scramjet combustor. Procedia Eng2015; 99: 313–319.
22.
WangYLiSYangX. Numerical investigation of the passive control of cavity flow oscillations by a dimpled non-smooth surface. Appl Acoust2016; 111: 16–24.
23.
ThiemannCL. An experimental study of supersonic cavity flow control with vertical rods. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee, 2013.
24.
SarnoRLFrankeME. Suppression of flow-Induced pressure oscillations in cavities. J Aircr1994; 31: 90–96.
25.
Sathianarayanan L, Venkatakrishnan A and Sharma SD. Control of low speed cavity flow using streamwise tabs at leading edge. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Grapevine, Texas, 9–13 January 2017.
26.
ZhuangNAlviFSAlkislarMB, et al. Supersonic cavity flows and their control. AIAA2006; 44: 2118–2128.
27.
SaranyamolVSKumarPDasS. Influence of impinging wall ramping modification on the flow field of open cavity at M = 2.0. J Fluids Eng ASME2018; 140: 071103.
28.
PeyYYChuaLPSiauwWL. Effect of trailing edge ramp on cavity flow structures and pressure drag. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2014; 45: 53–71.
29.
Das S and Cohen J. Influence of circular rear face geometry on the cavity flow oscillations at M = 0.7. In Proceedings of the 56th Israel annual conference on aerospace sciences, Tel-Aviv & Haifa, Israel, 9–10 March 2016.
30.
JengYNPayneUJ. Numerical study of a supersonic open cavity flow and pressure oscillation control. J Aircr1995; 32: 363–369.
31.
Wilcox FJ. Experimental investigation of porous-floor effects on cavity flow fields at supersonic speeds. NASA-3032, 1990.
32.
KimIChokaniN. Navier-Stokes study of supersonic cavity flowfield with passive control. J Aircr1992; 29: 217–223.
33.
KuoC-HHuangS-H. Influence of flow path modification on oscillation of cavity shear layer. Exp Fluids2001; 31: 162–178.
