Cavities are widely used as flameholders in supersonic combustors due to their outstanding potential to stabilize combustion without excessive total pressure loss. A review of cavity-stabilized combustion for scramjet applications is provided in this article. The topics cover the fundamental problems and recent advances regarding cavity-organized combustion in high-speed flows, including combustion stabilization modes and mechanisms, flame stability analyses and correlations, combustion oscillations, and other related issues. Remarkable questions such as cavity-coupled fuel injection, flow and combustion coupling, optimal cavity geometry and scale, auto-ignition and flame propagation interactions, and unsteady effects are discussed. Then, an attempt is made to provide some guidelines for the future research of cavity flameholders.
CurranET. Scramjet engines: the first forty years. J Propul Power2001; 17: 1138–1148.
2.
Ben-Yakar A, Hanson RK. Supersonic combustion of cross-flow jets and the influence of cavity flame-holders. In: 37th aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, 11–14 January 1999, AIAA Paper 99-0484.
3.
Ben-Yakar A. Experimental investigation of mixing and ignition of transverse jets in supersonic crossflows. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, 2000.
4.
MathurTGruberMJacksonK. Supersonic combustion experiments with a cavity-based fuel injector. J Propul Power2001; 17: 1305–1312.
5.
Ben-YakarAHansonRK. Cavity flame-holders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets: an overview. J Propul Power2001; 17: 869–878.
6.
MasumotoRTomiokaSKudoK. Experimental study on combustion modes in a supersonic combustor. J Propul Power2011; 27: 346–355.
7.
KouchiTMasuyaGMitaniT. Mechanism and control of combustion-mode transition in a scramjet engine. J Propul Power2012; 28: 106–112.
8.
BaoWYangQChangJ. Dynamic characteristics of combustion mode transitions in a strut-based scramjet combustor model. J Propul Power2011; 27: 1244–1248.
9.
FotiaMLDriscollJF. Ram-scram transition and flame/shock-train interactions in a model scramjet experiment. J Propul Power2013; 29: 261–273.
10.
Micka DJ, Driscoll JF. Reaction zone imaging in a dualmode scramjet combustor using CH-PLIF. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Hartford, CT, 21–23 July 2008, AIAA Paper 2008-5071.
11.
MickaDJDriscollJF. Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder. Proc Combust Institute2009; 32: 2397–2404.
12.
Micka DJ, Torrez SM, Driscoll JF. Heat release distribution in a dual-mode scramjet combustor–measurements and modeling. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Bremen, Germany, 19–22 October 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-7362.
13.
Micka DJ. Combustion stabilization, structure, and spreading in a laboratory dual-mode scramjet combustor. PhD Thesis, The University of Michigan, 2010.
14.
Tuncer O. Combustion in a ramjet combustor with cavity flame holder. In: 48th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, Florida, 4–7 January 2010, AIAA Paper 2010-1532.
15.
SunMBWangZGLiangJH. Flame characteristics in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of a cavity flameholder. J Propul Power2008; 24: 688–696.
16.
Sun MB, Wang HB, Bai XS, et al. Experimental and numerical study on flame stabilization in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholders. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2–5 August 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-5187.
17.
KimKMBaekSWHanCY. Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2004; 47: 271–286.
18.
DonbarJMGruberMRJakcsonTA. OH planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging in a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet combustor. Proc Combust Institute2000; 28: 679–687.
19.
Le J, Yang S, Wang X, et al. Analysis and correlation of flame stability limits in supersonic flow with cavity flameholder. In: 18th AIAA/3AF international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Tours, France, 24–28 September 2012, AIAA Paper 2012-5948.
20.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Combustion modes of hydrogen jet combustion in a cavity-based supersonic combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy2013; 38: 12078–12089.
21.
JeongEO’ByrneSJeungI-S. Investigation of supersonic combustion with angled injection in a cavity-based combustor. J Propul Power2008; 24: 1258–1268.
22.
SunMBWangHBBaiXS. Flame stabilization in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholders: experiments and simulations. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2011; 225: 1351–1365.
23.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Combustion characteristics in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholder. Proc Combust Institute2013; 34: 2073–2082.
24.
Cain T, Walton C. Review of experiments on ignition and flameholding in supersonic flow. In: 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana, 7–10 July 2002, AIAA Paper 2002-3877.
25.
O’Byrne S, Stotz I, Neely AJ, et al. OH PLIF Imaging of supersonic combustion using cavity injection. In: AIAA/CIRA 13th international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies, Capua, Italy, 16–20 May 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-3357.
Neely AJ, Stotz I, O'Byrne S, et al. Flow studies on a hydrogen-fueled cavity flame-holder scramjet. In: AIAA/CIRA 13th international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies, Capua, Italy, 16–20 May 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-3358.
28.
Allen W, King. P I, Gruber MR, et al. Fuel-air injection effects on combustion in cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Tucson, Arizona, 10–13 July 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-4105.
29.
Neely AJ, Riley C, Boyce RR, et al. Hydrocarbon and hydrogen-fueled scramjet cavity flameholder performance at high flight Mach numbers. In: 12th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies, Norfolk, Virginia, 15–19 December 2003, AIAA Paper 2003-6989.
30.
Jeong E, O’Byrne S, Jeung I-S, et al. Supersonic combustion on hydrogen fuel injection locations in a cavitybased combustor. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Hartford, CT, 21–23 July 2008, AIAA Paper 2008-4576.
31.
GruberMRDonbarJMCarterCD. Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow. J Propul Power2004; 20: 769–779.
32.
Edens SG, King PI, Gruber MR, et al. Performance measurements of direct air injection in a cavity-based flameholder for a supersonic combustor. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Sacramento, California, 9–12 July 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-4861.
33.
Grady NR, Frankland JH, Pitz RW, et al. UV Raman scattering measurements of supersonic reacting flow over a piloted, ramped cavity. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, 09–12 January 2012, AIAA Paper 2012-0614.
34.
RasmussenCCDriscollJFCarterCDHsuK-Y. Characteristics of cavity-stabilized flames in a supersonic flow. J Propul Power2005; 21: 765–769.
35.
Rasmussen CC, Driscoll JF. Blowout limits of flames in high-speed airflows: critical Damkohler number. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Hartford, CT, 21–23 July 2008, AIAA Paper 2008-4571.
36.
RasmussenCCDhanukaSKDriscollJF. Visualization of flameholding mechanisms in a supersonic combustor using PLIF. Proc Combust Institute2007; 31: 2505–2512.
37.
Taha AA, Tiwari SN, Mohieldin TO. Effect of pilot energy on the flame holding in scramjet engines. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Huntsville, Alabama, 20–23 July 2003, AIAA Paper 2003-5205.
OwensMGTehranianSSegalC. Flame-holding configurations for kerosene combustion in a Mach 1.8 airflow. J Propul Power1998; 14: 456–461.
40.
RasmussenCCDriscollJFHsubK-Y. Stability limits of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flow. Proc Combust Institute2005; 30: 2825–2834.
41.
Donohue JM. Dual-mode scramjet flameholding operability measurements. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, 07–10 January 2013, AIAA Paper 2013-0698.
42.
Lin K-C, Tam C-J, Boxx I, et al. Flame characteristics and fuel entrainment inside a cavity flame holder in a scramjet combustor. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, 8–11 July 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-5381.
43.
Lin K-C, Tam C-J, Jackson K. Study on the operability of cavity flameholders inside a scramjet combustor. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2–5 August 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-5028.
44.
Retaureau GJ, Menon S. Experimental studies on flame stability of a fueled cavity in a supersonic crossflow. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Nashville, TN, 25–28 July 2010, AIAA Paper 2010-6718.
45.
Choi JJ, Ghodke C, Menon S. Large-eddy simulation of cavity flame-holding in a Mach 2.5 cross flow. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, Florida, 4–7 January 2010, AIAA Paper 2010-414.
46.
Ghodke CD, Pranatharthikaran J, Retaureau GJ, et al. Numerical and experimental studies of flame stability in a cavity stabilized hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet. In: 17th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, San Francisco, California, 11–14 April 2011, AIAA Paper 2011-2365.
47.
TatmanBJRockwellRDGoyneCP. Experimental study of vitiation effects on flameholding in a cavity flameholder. J Propul Power2013; 29: 417–423.
48.
Davis DL, Bowersox RDW. Stirred reactor analysis of cavity flame holders for scramjets. In: 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Seattle, WA, 6–9 July 1997, AIAA Paper 97-3274.
49.
Davis D, Bowersox R. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cavity flame holders for scramjets. In: 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Seattle, WA, 6–9 July 1997, AIAA Paper 97-3270.
50.
Zukoski EE, Marble FE. Experiments concerning the mechanism of flame blowoff from bluff-bodies. In: Proceedings of the gas dynamics symposium on thermochemistry, Northwestern University, Evaston, IL, 1956, pp.205–225.
51.
Ozawa RI. Survey of basic data on flame stabilization and propagation for high speed combustion systems. TR AFAPL-TR-70-81, 1971.
52.
Thakur A, Segal C. Flameholding analyses in supersonic flow. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 11–14 July 2004, AIAA Paper 2004-3831.
53.
ThakurASegalC. Concentration distribution in a supersonic flow recirculation region. J Propul Power2008; 24: 64–73.
54.
DriscollJFRasmussenCC. Correlation and analysis of blowout limits of flames in high-speed airflows. J Propul Power2005; 21: 1035–1044.
ChenY-CBilgerRW. Stabilization mechanisms of lifted laminar flames in axisymmetric jet flows. Combust Flame2000; 122: 377–399.
57.
UpatnieksADriscollJRasmussenC. Liftoff on turbulent jet flames-assessment of edge flame and other concepts using cinema-PIV. Combust Flame2004; 138: 259–272.
58.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Large eddy simulation based studies of jet-cavity interactions in a supersonic flow. Acta Astronautica2014; 93: 182–192.
59.
Ma FH, Li J, Yang V. Thermoacoustic flow instability in a scramjet combustor. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Tucson, Arizona, 10–13 July 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-3824.
60.
Stalling RL, Wilcox FJ. Experimental cavity pressure distributions at supersonic speeds. NASA TP-2683, 1987.
61.
Tam CJ. Algebraic turbulence model simulations of supersonic open-cavity flow physics. AIAA J 1996; 34: 2255–2260.
62.
Nenmeni VA, Yu K. Cavity-induced mixing enhancement in confined supersonic flows. In: 40th aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, 14–17 January 2002, AIAA Paper 2002-1010.
63.
Quick A, King PI, Gruber MR, et al. Upstream mixing cavity coupled with a downstream flameholding cavity behavior in supersonic flow. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Tucson, Arizona, 10–13 July 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-3709.
64.
YuKWilsonKJSchadowKC. Effect of flame-holding cavities on supersonic-combustion performance. J Propul Power2001; 17: 1287–1295.
65.
Zang A, Tempel T, Yu K. Experimental characterization of cavity-augmented supersonic mixing. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 10–13 January 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-1423.
66.
Seiner JM, Dash SM, Kenzakowski DC. Historical survey on enhanced mixing in scramjet engines. In: 9th international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference and 3rd weakly ionized gases workshop, Norfolk, VA, 1–5 November 1999, AIAA Paper 99-4869.
67.
KangSHLeeYJYangSSSmartMK. Cowl and cavity effects on mixing and combustion in scramjet engines. J Propul Power2011; 27: 1169–1177.
68.
WangHWangZSunM. Numerical study on supersonic mixing and combustion with hydrogen injection upstream of a cavity flameholder. Heat Mass Transfer. Published online 2013. DOI 10.1007/s00231-013-1227-7.
69.
WangHBSunMBQinN. Characteristics of oscillations in supersonic open cavity flows. Flow Turbulence Combust2013; 90: 121–142.
70.
LinK-CJacksonKBehdadniaR. Acoustic characterization of an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor with a cavity flameholder. J Propul Power2010; 26: 1161–1169.
71.
ChoiJYMaFYangV. Combustion oscillations in a scramjet engine combustor with transverse fuel injection. Proc Combust Institute2005; 30: 2851–2858.
72.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Nonlinear analysis of combustion oscillations in a cavity-based supersonic combustor. Sci China Technol Sci2013; 56: 1093–1101.
73.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Large-Eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation of combustion oscillations in a cavity-based supersonic combustor. Int J Hydrogen Energy2013; 38: 5918–5927.
74.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Experimental study of oscillations in a scramjet combustor with cavity flameholders. Exper Thermal Fluid Sci2013; 45: 259–263.
75.
WangHBWangZGSunMB. Experimental and numerical investigation of cavity-based supersonic flow and combustion. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering.. Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0954410013480300.
76.
Lin K-C, Ma FH, Li J, et al. Acoustic characterization of an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor with a recessed cavity flameholder. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, 8–11 July 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-5382.
77.
Choi J-Y, Yang V, Ma FH. Detached eddy simulation of combustion dynamics in scramjet combustors. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, 8–11 July 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-5027.
78.
KangSHLeeYJYangSS. Effects of flameholder configurations on combustion in scramjet engines. J Propul Power2012; 28: 739–746.
79.
Jacobsen LS, Carter CD, Dwenge AC. Cavity-based injector mixing experiments for supersonic combustors with implications on igniter placement. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Sacramento, California, 9–12 July 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-5268, 2006.
80.
Olmstead DT, Gruber MR, Collatz MJ, et al. Cavity coupled aeroramp injector combustion study. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2–5 August 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-5227.
81.
Gu H, Chen L, Wang D, et al. Experimental investigation on coupling characteristics of cavity flameholder and strut jet. In: 18th AIAA/3AF international space planes and hypersonic systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France, 24–28 September 2012, AIAA Paper 2012-5961.
82.
HsuK-YCarterCDGruberMR. Experimental study of cavity-strut combustion in supersonic flow. J Propul Power2010; 26: 1237–1246.
83.
Ghodke CD, Choi JJ, Srinivasan S, et al. Large eddy simulation of supersonic combustion in a cavity-strut flameholder. In: 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, Florida, 4–7 January 2011, AIAA Paper 2011-323.
84.
GradyNRPitzRWCarterCD. Supersonic flow over a ramped-wall cavity flame holder with an upstream strut. J Propul Power2012; 28: 982–990.
85.
Montes LDR, King PI, Gruber MR, et al. Mixing effects of pylon-aided fuel injection located upstream of a flameholding cavity in supersonic flow. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Tucson, Arizona, 10–13 July 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-3913.
86.
Haubelt LC, King PI, Gruber MR, et al. Performance of pylons upstream of a cavity-based flameholder in nonreacting supersonic fow. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Sacramento, California, 9–12 July 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-4679.
87.
Freeborn AB, King PI, Gruber MR. Leading edge pylon effects on a scramjet pylon-cavity flameholder flowfield. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Hartford, CT, 21–23 July 2008, AIAA Paper 2008-4709.
88.
FreebornABKingPIGruberMR. Swept-leading-edge pylon effects on a scramjet pylon-cavity flameholder flowfield. J Propul Power2009; 25: 571–582.
89.
Pan Y, Liu WD, Wang ZG. Cavities installation schemes affect on the scramjet ignition. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, 8–11 July 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-5400.
90.
Collatz MJ, Gruber MR, Olmstead DT, et al. Dual cavity scramjet operability and performance study. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2–5 August 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-5030.
91.
YuGLiJGChangXYChenLH. Fuel injection and flame stabilization in a liquid-kerosene-fueled supersonic combustor. J Propul Power2003; 19: 885–893.
92.
Situ M, Wang C, Lu HP, et al. Hot gas piloted energy for supersonic combustion of kerosene with dual-cavity. In: 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, 8–11 January 2001, AIAA Paper 2001-0523.
93.
Situ M, Wang C, Zhuang FG. Investigation of supersonic combustion of kerosene jets with hot gas piloted energy and dual-cavity. In: 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, 14–17 January 2002, AIAA Paper 2002-0804.
94.
Ebrahimi HB, Gaitonde DV, Malo-Molina FJ. Parametric study of 3-D hydrocarbon scramjet engine with cavity. In: 45th AIAA aerospace Sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 8–11 January 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-645.
95.
EbrahimiHBMalo-MolinaFJGaitondeDV. Numerical simulation of injection strategies in a cavity-based supersonic combustor. J Propul Power2012; 28: 991–999.
96.
LeeKJKangSHLeeYJ. Effects of fuel injectors and cavity configurations on supersonic combustion. J Propul Power2013; 29: 1052–1063.
97.
Lin K-C, Tam C-J, Jackson K, et al. Fueling study on scramjet operability enhancement. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2–5 August 2009, AIAA Paper 2009-5116.
98.
SegalCMcDanielJCWhitehurstRB. Mixing and chemical kinetics interactions in a Mach 2 reacting flow. J Propul Power1995; 11: 308–314.
99.
SegalC. The scramjet engine—processes and characteristics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
100.
SunMBGengHLiangJH. Mixing characteristics in a supersonic combustor with gaseous fuel injection upstream of a cavity flameholder. Flow, Turbulence Combust2009; 82: 271–286.
101.
MitaniTIzumikawaM. Criteria for flame holding in H2-fueled scramjet engines. Proc Combust Institute2000; 28: 689–695.
102.
GruberMRBaurleRAMathurT. Fundamental studies of cavity-based flameholder concepts for supersonic combustors. J Propul Power2001; 17: 146–153.
103.
YangILeeYJLeeKJ. Effect of combustor configuration on flow and combustion in a scramjet engine. J Propul Power2013; 29: 751–755.
104.
BoivinPDauptainAJiménezC. Simulation of a supersonic hydrogen–air autoignition-stabilized flame using reduced chemistry. Combustion Flame2012; 159: 1779–1790.
105.
TakahashiSYamanoGWakaiK. Self-ignition and transition to flame-holding in a rectangular scramjet combustor with a backward step. Proc Combust Institute2000; 28: 705–712.
106.
ChengTSWehrmeyerJAPitzRW. Raman measurement of mixing and finite-rate chemistry in a supersonic hydrogen-air difusion flame. Combust Flame1994; 99: 157–173.
107.
Liu J, Tam C, Lu T, et al. Simulations of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flows using reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Sacramento, California, 9–12 July 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-4862, 2006.
108.
DomingoPVervischaLVeynanteD. Large-eddy simulation of a lifted methane jet flame in a vitiated coflow. Combust Flame2008; 152: 415–432.
109.
BaurleRAGirimajibSS. Assumed PDF turbulence-chemistry closure with temperature-composition correlations. Combust Flame2003; 134: 131–148.
110.
WangHBQinNSunMB. A hybrid LES (Large Eddy Simulation)/assumed sub-grid PDF(Probability Density Function) model for supersonic turbulent combustion. Sci China Technol Sci2011; 54: 2694–2707.
111.
KooHDondePRamanV. A quadrature-based LES/transported probability density function approach for modeling supersonic combustion. Proc Combust Institute2011; 33: 2203–2210.
112.
PetersN. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Progr Energy Combust Sci1984; 10: 319–339.
113.
BerglundMFurebyC. LES of supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine model. Proc Combust Institute2007; 31: 2497–2504.
114.
HammackSDLeeTHsuK-Y. High-repetition-rate OH planar laser-induced fluorescence of a cavity flameholder. J Propul Power2013; 29: 1248–1251.
