This report investigates the flight dynamics of a small-scale (2 ft) towed system using a quadcopter and actively controlled payload. A towed system includes a main driver to propel the system forward connected to a payload via a tether. The towed system here is unique, and in that the driver is a scratch built quadcopter while the payload is also a scratch built actively controlled aircraft. The payload is designed to carry a small instrument that must be sufficiently far away from all interferences created by a quadcopter. A fully non-linear full state model is created and utilized to reveal that oscillations in the payload are decreased with the introduction of a PD controller on the payload. An experimental setup is built to validate simulation results. Experiments show that an actively controlled payload can decrease the attitude oscillations of the payload.
PalomakiRT, et al.Wind estimation in the lower atmosphere using multirotor aircraft. J Atmos Ocean Technol2017; 34: 1183–1191.
2.
Schibelius L and Montalvo C. Multi-MASS: a fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles for atmospheric characterization. In: AIAA AVIATION. Denver, CO, June 2017.
3.
Kimball S, et al. Observing atmospheric parameters using quadcopters. In: 98th Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society. Austin, Texas, January 2018.
4.
Kimball SK, Montalvo C and Schibelius L. Comparing quadcopter iMET temperature, pressure, and humidity data with 10 m tower data. In: 97th Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society. Seattle, Washington, January 2017.
5.
Kimball SK, et al. Observing atmospheric parameters using quadcopters. In: Southeastern Coastal and Atmospheric Processes Symposium. February 2018.
6.
Neidhoefer J, Langelaan J and Alley N. Wind field estimation for small unmanned aerial vehicles. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010.
7.
DunionJKatzbergS. Comparison of reflected GPS wind speed retrievals with dropsondes in tropical cyclones. Geophys Res Lett2009; 36: L17602.
OsbornTRLueckRG. Turbulence measurements from a towed body. J Atmos Ocean Technol1985; 2: 517–527.
10.
BisgaardMla Cour-HarboABendtsenJD. Adaptive control system for autonomous helicopter slung load operations. Contl Eng Pract2010; 18: 800–811.
11.
Stuckey RA. Mathematical modeling of helicopter slung-load systems. In: Defense Science and Technology Organisation Victoria (Australia) Aeronautical and Maritime Prepared using sagej.cls Huynh and Montalvo 19 Research Lab. ADA401423, December 2001, https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a401423.pdf.
12.
Ivler C, Tischler M and Powell J. Cable angle feedback control systems to improve handling qualities for helicopters with slung loads. In: AIAA Aviation, 2011. DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6686.
13.
Singer N, Singhose W and Kriikku E. An input shaping controller enabling cranes to move without sway. In: American Nucler Society 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems, 1997.
14.
Adams C, Potter J and Singhose W. Modeling and input shaping control of a micro coaxial radio-controlled helicopter carrying a suspended load. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), October 2012, pp.645–650.
15.
KunDWHwangI. Linear matrix inequality-based nonlinear adaptive robust control of quadrotor. J Guid Control Dynam2016; 39: 996–998.
16.
BrownARogersJ. A sampling-based probabilistic path planner for multirotor air vehicles in clustered environments. In: Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering2017; 231: 143–162.
17.
KoseOOktayT. Dynamic modeling and simulation of quadrotor for different flight conditions. Eur J Sci Technol2019; 15: 132–142.
18.
JonesSPKrausmanJA. Nonlinear dynamic simulation of a tether aerostat. J Aircraft1982; 19: 679–686.
19.
ModiVJ, et al.Experimental investigation of the dynamics of spinning tethered bodies. Acta Astron1996; 39: 487–495.
20.
LiuFHu Q and LiuY. Attitude dynamics of electric sail from multibody perspective. J Guidance Control Dynam2018; 41: 1–14.
21.
GoodarziFALeeDLeeT. Geometric control of a quadrotor UAV transporting a payload connected via flexible cable. Int J Control Automat Syst2015; 13: 1486–1498.
22.
Kotaru P, Wu G and Sreenath K. Dynamics and control of a quadrotor with a payload suspended through an elastic cable. In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2017, pp.3906–3913.
23.
Huynh N, Ratcliffe A and Montalvo C. Dynamics of multi-purpose light weight towed systems. In: AIAA AVIATION, Denver, CO, June 2017. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3551.
24.
Etkins B. Dynamics of atmospheric flight. Mineola, New York: Dover, 2000, pp.9–13, 134–151, 196–318.
25.
Phillips WF. Mechanics of flight. New Jersey: Wiley, 2010, pp.10–13, 260–270, 715–753.
26.
NelsonRC. Flight stability and automatic control, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
27.
Hung DN, Yu L and Mori K. Aerodynamic characteristics of quadrotor helicopter. In: AIAA Flight Testing Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Denver, CO, June 2017, pp.3141. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3141.
28.
MahoneyRKumarVCorkeP. Multirotor aerial vehicles: modeling, estimation, and control of a quadrotor. In: IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine2012; 19: 20–32.
29.
Huang H, et al. Aerodynamics and control of autonomous quadrotor helicopters in aggressive maneuvering. In: Proc IEEE Int Conference of Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2009, 3277–3282. DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152561.
30.
HamelT, et al.Dynamic modeling and configuration stabilization for an X4-Flyer. IFAC Proc2002; 35: 217–222.
31.
Phang S, et al. Design and mathematical modeling of a 4‐standard‐propeller (4SP) quadrotor. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, July 2012. DOI: 10.1109/WCICA.2012.6358437.
32.
LeishmanJG. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Bouabdallah S, Noth A and Siegwart R. PID vs. LQ control techniques applied to an indoor micro quadrotor. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), 2007.
35.
CarithersCMontalvoC. Experimental control of two connected fixed wing aircraft. Aerospace2018, pp. 113.
36.
Montalvo C. Meta aircraft flight dynamics and controls. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2014.
37.
Andŕe Deperrois. About stability analysis using XFLR5 Presentation document, http://www.xflr5.tech (2008, accessed 10 June 2020).
38.
MontalvoCCostelloM. Avoiding lockout instability for towed parafoil systems. J Guidance Control Dynam2016; 39: 985–995.
39.
MontalvoCWhiteH. Braking control law for a barbell electric sail. Acta Astronautica2019; 160: 1–6.
40.
MontalvoCWiegmannB. Electric sail space flight dynamics and controls. Acta Astronautica2018; 148: 268–275.
