In this paper, the time-averaged and instantaneous information of the vaporized kerosene jet injection into a quiescent atmospheric environment, including the expansion angle, deflection angle and shock wave structure, were acquired by natural light and a schlieren system. The results show that the jet expansion angle increases first and then decreases during the kerosene vaporization, which is mainly governed by the pressure change inside the shear layer and the variation in the jet axial speed. Compared with straight injection, the oblique scheme inhibits the jet expansion process and enhances the expansion property in the vertical and parallel directions of the bevel face. Because of the asymmetric configuration of the injector exit and the adsorptive effect of the bevel face, the jet plume in the oblique injection scheme obviously deflects along the axial direction. In addition, the expansion angle fluctuates when the vaporized kerosene is injected into some specific conditions. The frequency of the jet pulse is approximately 2.1 Hz, and the pulsation mode gradually converts during the vaporization process. The two-phase flow instability occurring in upstream heated kerosene might be responsible for this unique phenomenon.
LiuGZHanYJWangL, et al.Supercritical thermal cracking of N-dodecane in presence of several initiative additives: products distribution and kinetics. Energy Fuels2008; 22: 3960–3969.
3.
Axel VR, Bruno R, Patrick R, et al. Experimental investigations on the self-ignition of a thermally decomposed endothermic fuel in hot supersonic air flow in the MPP-LAERTE combustion test bench. In: The 15th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Dayton, Ohio, 28 April–1 May 2008, paper no. 2008-2676, pp. 2676–2683. Reston, VA: AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-2676.
4.
ShinJSungHG. Combustion characteristics of hydrogen and cracked kerosene in a DLR scramjet combustor using hybrid RANS/LES method. Aerosp Sci Technol2018; 80: 433–444.
5.
UlasABoysanE. Numerical analysis of regenerative cooling in liquid propellant rocket engines. Aerosp Sci Technol2013; 24: 187–197.
6.
JiangJZhangRLLeJL, et al.Regeneratively cooled scramjet heat transfer calculation and comparison with experimental data. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2014; 228: 1227–1234.
7.
Tishko JM, Drummond JP, Edwards T, et al. Future direction of supersonic combustion research: air Force/NASA workshop on supersonic combustion. NASA Langley Technical Report Server, 1997.
8.
ZhaoGZSongWYZhangRL. Effect of pressure on thermal cracking of china RP-3 aviation kerosene under supercritical conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2015; 84: 625–632.
9.
KimYJSohnCHHongM, et al.An analysis of fuel–oxidizer mixing and combustion induced by swirl coaxial jet injector with a model of gas–gas injection. Aerosp Sci Technol2014; 37: 37–47.
10.
JiangRPLiuGZYouZQ, et al.On the critical points of thermally cracked hydrocarbon fuels under high pressure. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50: 9456–9465.
11.
JiangRPLiuGZZhangXW. Thermal cracking of hydrocarbon aviation fuels in regenerative cooling microchannels. Energy Fuels2013; 27: 2563–2577.
12.
WuPKChenTNejadA, et al.Injection of supercritical ethylene in nitrogen. J Propul Power1995; 12: 770–777.
13.
StarAMEdwardsJRLinKC, et al.Numerical simulation of injection of supercritical ethylene into nitrogen. J Propul Power2006; 22: 809–819.
14.
Lin KC, Cox-Stouffer S and Kennedy PJ. Expansion of supercritical methane/ethylene jets in a quiescent subcritical environment. In: The 41st aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 6–9 January, paper no. 2003-483, pp. 483–496. Reston, VA: AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-483.
15.
Edwards JR, Pinto AM, Lin KC, et al. Simulation of injection of supercritical methane/ethylene mixtures into nitrogen. In: The 33rd AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, Orlando, Florida, 23–26 June 2003, paper no. 2003-4267. Reston, VA: AIAA.
16.
Gao W, Liang HS, Xu QH, et al. Injection of supercritical aviation kerosene fuel into quiescent atmospheric environment, In: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Denver, Colorado, 2–5 August 2009, paper no. 2009-4927, pp. 4927–4935. Reston, VA: AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-4927.
17.
HoCMGutmarkE. Vortex induction and mass entrainment in a small-aspect-ratio elliptic jet. J Fluid Mech1987; 179: 383–405.
18.
SchadowKCGutmarkEKoshigoeS, et al.Combustion-related shear-flow dynamics in elliptic supersonic jets. AIAA J1989; 27: 1347–1353.
19.
FullerEJMaysRBThomasRH, et al.Mixing studies of helium in air at high supersonic speeds. AIAA J1992; 30: 2234–2243.
20.
Abdelhafez A and Gupta A. Numerical investigation of oblique fuel injection in a supersonic combustor. In: The 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno Nevada, 7–10 January 2008, paper no. 2008-68, pp. 68–81. Reston, VA: AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-68.
21.
Abdelhafez A, Gupta A, Balar R, et al. Evaluation of oblique and traverse fuel injection in a supersonic combustor. In: The 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, 8–11 July 2007, paper no. 2007-5026, pp. 5026–5035. Reston, VA: AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-5026.
22.
QiYYZhuLLiuWL, et al.Numerical investigation of various fuel injection angles on interaction in cold kerosene-fueled supersonic flow. Procedia Manuf2017; 7: 66–71.
23.
Chandra MurtyMSRChakrabortyD. Numerical simulation of angular injection of hydrogen fuel in scramjet combustor. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2011; 7: 861–872.
24.
GruberMRNejadtASChenTH, et al.Mixing and penetration studies of sonic jets in a Mach 2 freestream. J Propul Power1995; 11: 315–323.
25.
Stenning AH and Veziroglu TN. Flow oscillation modes in forced convection boiling. In: Proceedings of the Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, Los Angeles, California, 21–23 June 1965, pp.301–316. NASA.
26.
Svanholm K. A study of hydrodynamic instability in natural circulation boiling coolant channels by means of graphical computation. In: TN Veziroglu (ed). Multiphase transport: fundamentals, reactor safety, applications, Vol. 3, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1987, pp. 1337–1372.
27.
WangNZhouJPanY, et al.Experimental investigation on flow patterns of RP-3 kerosene under sub-critical and supercritical pressures. Acta Astronaut2014; 94: 834–842.
28.
IsaevGIAbdullaevaGK. Heat transfer to an ascending laminar flow of hydrocarbons under supercritical pressure conditions. J Eng Phys Thermophys2006; 79: 722–726.
29.
SongWKimDLeeK, et al.Effects of kerosene heating on dynamic characteristics of GOx/kerosene combustor. Acta Astronaut2016; 126: 528–535.
30.
ZhongFQFanXJYuG, et al.Heat transfer of aviation kerosene at supercritical conditions. J Thermophys Heat Transfer2009; 23: 543–550.
31.
Huber M. NIST thermophysical properties of hydrocarbon mixtures database. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Data Program, January 2007.
32.
Liu ZQ, Liang JH and Pan Y. Numerical analysis of heat transfer deterioration of China RP-3 aviation kerosene in a circular tube at supercritical pressures. In: AIAA/ASME joint thermophysics and heat transfer conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–20 June 2014, paper no. 2014-3358, pp. 3358–3367. Reston, VA: AIAA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-3358.
33.
DengHWZhangCBXuG, et al.Density measurements of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel at sub- and supercritical conditions. J Chem Eng Data2011; 56: 2980–2986.
