This article proposes a systematic approach for the preliminary design of a hypersonic airbreathing (scramjet) vehicle within an academic context. The goal is to serve as an educational tool, focusing on teaching students the fundamental physical concepts behind scramjets. The article provides essential equations for generic scramjet designs while explaining the simplifications made from an academic perspective. It demonstrates the use of spreadsheets as a user-friendly tool to modify parameters and observe the behavior of shock waves. The article outlines a four-step procedure. It includes estimating atmospheric properties, designing the supersonic inlet, calculating combustion chamber parameters, and determining postcombustor properties. An academic exercise illustrates these steps for a scramjet flying at a specific velocity and altitude. The results show that this procedure, combined with spreadsheets, enables a rapid prediction of thermodynamic properties, enhancing the understanding of the fundamental physics behind hypersonic airbreathing vehicles.
PiscitelliFCutroneLPezzellaG, et al.Nose-to-tail analysis of an airbreathing hypersonic vehicle using an in-house simplified tool. Acta Astronaut2017; 136: 148–158.
2.
BonelliFCutroneLVottaR, et al.Preliminary design of a hypersonic air-breathing vehicle. In: AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, San Francisco, California, United States, 11–14 April 2011, paper no. AIAA 2011-2319, pp.1–14. Reston: AIAA.
3.
BowcuttKG. Flying at the edge of space and beyond: The opportunity and challenges of hypersonic flight. Bridge2020; 50: 51–58.
ZapataE.An assessment of cost improvements in the NASA COTS - CRS program and implications for future NASA missions. In: AIAA Space Conference, Orlando, Florida, United States, 12–14 September 2017, paper no. KSC-E-DAA-TN4427, pp.1–35. Reston: AIAA.
KetsdeverADYoungMPMossmanJB, et al.Overview of advanced concepts for space access. J Spacecr Rockets2010; 47: 238–250.
10.
Congressional Research Service. Hypersonic weapons: background and issues for Congress. Report for Members and Commitees of Congress. Report no. R45811, 13 February 2023. Washington, DC: CRS.
11.
PappalardoD. Hypersonic: Between rhetoric and reality. Vortex: Stud on air and Space Power2022; 3: 37–48.
12.
HeiserWHPrattDT.Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1994, p. 587.
13.
FryRS. A century of ramjet propulsion technology evolution. J Propuls Power2004; 20: 27–58.
14.
ToroPGPCarneiroRAraújoJWS, et al.Design and analysis of a generic scramjet air inlet. In: Brazilian Congress of Thermal Sciences and Engineering, Águas de Lindóia, Brazil, 25–28 November 2018, paper no. ENCIT-2018-075, pp. 1–10. Rio de Janeiro: ABCM.
15.
OatesGC.Aerothermodynamics of gas turbine and rocket propulsion. 3nd ed. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1997, p. 469.
16.
ToroPGPOliveiraGIACarvalhoLAS, et al.Equilibrium and perfect gas behavior at the stagnation region. In: Brazilian Congress of Thermal Sciences and Engineering, Águas de Lindóia, Brazil, 25–28 November 2018, paper no. ENCIT-2018-0817, pp. 1–9. Rio de Janeiro: ABCM.
17.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States Air Force. U.S. standard atmosphere. Report NASA TM-X 74335, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, USA, October 1976.
18.
SpakovszkyZS. Thermodynamics and propulsion. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node18.html (2007, accessed 17 December 2023).
19.
RanHMavrisD.Preliminary design of a 2D supersonic inlet to maximize total pressure recovery. In: Aviation, Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), Arlington, Virginia, United States, 26–28 September 2005, paper no. AIAA 2005-7357, pp. 1–11. Reston: AIAA.
20.
OswatitschK. Pressure recovery for missiles with reaction propulsion at high supersonic speeds: the efficiency of shock diffusers. Report NACA TM no. 1140, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, Virginia, United States, 1947.
21.
MartosJFA.Aerothermodynamic design, manufacturing and testing of a 3-d prototyped scramjet. Doctoral dissertation, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil, 2017.
22.
AraujoPPBPereiraMVSMarinhoGS, et al.Optimization of scramjet inlet based on temperature and Mach number of supersonic combustion. Aerosp Sci Technol2021; 116: 1–13.
23.
AndersonJD.Modern compressible flow: The historical perspective. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003, p. 760.
ToroPGPCarneiroRAraújoJWS, et al.Design of a generic scramjet combustion chamber. In: Brazilian Congress of Thermal Sciences and Engineering, Águas de Lindóia, Brazil, 25–28 November 2018, paper no. ENCIT-2018-0056, pp. 1–10. Rio de Janeiro: ABCM.
26.
RobertsKNWilsonDR.Analysis and design of a hypersonic scramjet engine with a transition Mach number of 4.00. In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, United States, 5–8 January 2009, paper no. AIAA 2009-1255, pp. 1–29. Reston: AIAA.
