Aerodynamic modeling of a flexible flapping-wing micro-air vehicle in the bond graph environment with the aim of assessing the lateral control power

Abstract

In this paper, an integrated and systematic modeling of all components and subsystems of a flapping bird robot is developed using the bond graph method. The wings kinematic is independently implemented with the aim of evaluating lateral movements of the bird and aerodynamic forces are accurately extracted by assuming quasi-steady theory. In the present dynamic model, the aeroelastic bending behavior of flexible wing of the flapping bird is revealed by the bond graph method. In this regard, three elastic bending modes and one rigid motion mode of the wing are added to the model. In the following, the performance evaluation of the flapping bird and parametric study are carried out around important quantities such as frequency, initial incidence angle, torsional stiffness, and flapping amplitude of the wings, which results in applicable and attractive consequences. As an innovation, the initial classification and presentation of the comparative characteristic curves for generating lateral forces without using an additional control surface and only based on asymmetry in the flapping kinematic using the bond graph approach is done, which is essential to perform lateral-directional maneuvers. Some important correlations are achieved, which are presented in detail in the text. As an example, the relation between lateral force and phase difference between wings is quasi-linear in a variety of velocities. Therefore, this parameter can be used as input in design of lateral control system. On the other hand, the sensitivity of the lateral force to active pitch angle is more than other quantities; as a result, such mechanism can be effectively used in rapid maneuvers. Finally, based on the presented bond graph model, it would be easily possible to study the effects of design variables, mechanical properties, geometric constraints, and specially flapping kinematics on a wide range of functional and performance indices.

Keywords

Bond graph approach flapping-wing aerodynamic modeling elastic wing flight dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jones KD and Platzer MF. Flapping wing propulsion for a micro air vehicle. In: Proceedings of 38th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, aerospace sciences meetings, Reno, NV, USA, 10–13 January 2000, pp.1–13.

Yang

Song

. Experimental investigation of aerodynamics of feather-covered flapping wing. Appl Bionics Biomech 2017; 3019640: 1–8.

Mazeheri

Ebrahimi

Karimian

. Performance analysis of a flapping wing vehicle based on experimental aerodynamic data. ASCE J Aerosp Eng 2011; 25: 45–50.

Tuncer

Platzer

. Thrust generation due to airfoil flapping. AIAA J 1996; 34: 324–331.

Jahanbin

Karimian

. Modeling and parametric study of a flexible flapping-wing MAV using the bond graph approach. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2018; 40: 1–19.

Tay

. Effect of different types of wing-wing interactions in flapping MAVs. J Bionic Eng 2017; 14: 60–74.

Schenato L, Deng X, Wu WC, et al. Virtual insect flight simulator (VIFS): a software testbed for insect flight. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, South Korea, 21–26 May 2001, pp.1–8.

Yang

Song

Wang

, et al. Dynamic fluid-structure coupling method of flexible flapping wing for MAV. J Aerosp Eng 2015; 28: 04015006–04015006.

Sane

Dickinson

. The force control of flight in complex flapping wing robot, lift and drag production. J Exp Biol 2003; 204: 2607–2626.

10.

Templin

. The spectrum of animal flight: insects to pterosaurs. Prog Aerosp Sci 2000; 36: 393–436.

11.

. Unsteady aerodynamics and flow control for flapping wing flyers. Prog Aerosp Sci 2003; 39: 635–681.

12.

Combs

Daniel

. Into thin air contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the Hawk moth. J Exp Biol 2003; 206: 2999–3006.

13.

Pourtakdoust

Karimian

. Performance analysis of the FMAV propulsion based on a new experimentally validated aeroelastic model. J Syst Des Dyn 2012; 6: 1–16.

14.

Sun

Tang

. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J Exp Biol 2002; 205: 55–70.

15.

Liu

. A computational fluid dynamic study of hawk moth hovering. J Exp Biol 1998; 201: 461–477.

16.

Smith

. Simulating moth wing aerodynamics: towards the development of flapping-wing technology. AIAA J 1996; 34: 1348–1355.

17.

Smith MJ. Simulating flapping wings using an aerodynamic panel method. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, USA, 1995.

18.

Heathcote

Martin

Gursul

. Flexible flapping wing propulsion at zero free stream velocity. AIAA J 2004; 42: 2196–2204.

19.

Rifai

Marchand

Poulin

. Bounded control of an underactuated biomimetic aerial vehicle - validation with robustness tests. Rob Auton Syst 2012; 60: 1165–1178.

20.

Hodges

Pierce

. Introduction to structural dynamic and aeroelasticity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

21.

Ebrahimi A and Mazaheri K, Strip theory method for ornithopter wing aerodynamic analysis, In: Proceedings of 10th Iranian fluid dynamics conference, Iran, October 2006, pp.1–7 (in Persian).

22.

Pourtakdoust

Karimian

. Evaluation of flapping wing propulsion based on aeroelastic model. Sci Iran 2012; 19: 472–482.

23.

Ellington

. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VA vortex theory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1984; 305: 115–144.

24.

Hong YS. An experimental study of spanwise flow effects on lift generation in flapping wings. PhD Thesis, University of Dayton, USA, 2006.

25.

Widhiarinia

Park

Yoon

, et al. Bird-mimetic wing system of flapping-wing micro air vehicle with autonomous flight control capability. J Bionic Eng 2017; 13: 458–467.

26.

Ward

Fearday

Salami

, et al. A bibliometric review of progress in micro air vehicle research. Int J Micro Air Veh 2017; 9: 146–165.

27.

Hong

Altman

. Lift from spanwise flow in simple flapping wings. J Aircraft 2008; 45: 1206–1216.

28.

Singh

Moreschi

Suárez

, et al. Seismic design forces. I: rigid nonstructural components. J Struct Eng-ASCE 2006; 132: 1524–1532.

29.

Yoo

. Design of longitudinal stiffeners on box girder flanges. Int J Steel Struct 2001; 1: 15–23.

30.

Rosenfeld N and Wereley N. A time-periodic stability analysis of flapping wing structures for micro air vehicles. In: Proceedings of 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April 2007.

31.

Xue

Song

, et al. Effect of wing flexibility on flight dynamics stability of flapping wing MAVs in forward flight. Int J Micro Air Veh 2016; 8: 170–180.

32.

. An experimental investigation on the aerodynamic performances of flexible membrane wings in flapping flight. Aerosp Sci Technol 2010; 14: 575–586.

33.

Bontemps A, Valenciennes F, Grondel S, et al. Modeling and evaluation of power transmission of flapping wing nano air vehicle. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME 10th international conference on mechatronic and embedded systems and applications, Italy, 10–12 September 2014, pp.1–6.

34.

Dupont S, Grondel S. Bontemps A, et al. Bond graph model of a flapping wing micro-air vehicle. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME 10th international conference on mechatronic and embedded systems and applications, Italy, 10–12 September 2014, pp.1–6.

35.

Jahanbin

Ghafari

Ebrahimi

, et al. Multi-body simulation of a flapping-wing robot using an efficient dynamical model. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2016; 38: 133–149.

36.

Ebrahimi A and Mazaheri K. Experimental evaluation of the unsteady aerodynamic forces in a flapping wing. In: Proceedings of 8th aerospace society conference, Iran, 17–19 February 2008 (in Persian).

37.

Karnopp

Margolis

Rosenberg

. System dynamics modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems, Etobicoke, ON: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.

38.

Mukherjee

Karmakar

. Modeling and simulation of engineering systems through bond graphs, New Delhi: Alpha Science International Ltd, 2000.