An increasing focus on hybrid airships and the developments in renewable energies has allowed a methodology for conceptual design and analysis to be described. After a model presented and its aerodynamic characteristics obtained through a computational fluid dynamics method, two types of hybrid airships, solar powered at high altitudes and hydrogen powered for cargo, are demonstrated using a wing loading as their independent variable. Then the constraints determining the design point are presented. Parametric estimates of two types for component mass are then illustrated on distribution diagrams. And the sensitivity of wing loading and its effects on hybrid airships are discussed.
Jensen R. Operational considerations for large hybrid air vehicles. In: AIAA aviation technology, integration and operations, Chicago, IL, 20–24 September 2004.
2.
PrenticeBEKnottsR. Cargo airships: international competition. J Transport Tech2014; 4: 187–195.
3.
KhouryGA. Airship technology, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
4.
Brandon B. The suitability of hybrid vs. conventional airships for persistent surveillance missions. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, 4–7 January 2010.
5.
Gu Z. Research of stratospheric airships’ skin material. Report on Spacecraft recovery & remote sensing 2007-01, 2007. Beijing: Tsinghua Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd.
6.
StockbridgeCCerutiAMarzoccaP. Airship research and development in the areas of design, structures, dynamics and energy systems. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2012; 13: 170–187.
7.
Rawdon B and Hoisington Z. Air vehicle design for mass-market cargo transport. In: Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 6–9 January 2003.
8.
Prentice B, Ashcroft J and Hochstetler R. Can modern transport airships change the world? In: AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology conference, Seattle, WA, 4–7 May 2009.
9.
Ghanmi A. Hybrid air vehicles for military logistics heavy lift. In: Support of Canadian Forces Northern Operations, April 2013. Defence R&D Canada – CORA.
10.
ArdemaMD. Feasibility of modern airships: preliminary assessment. J Aircraft1977; 14: 1140–1148.
11.
LiaoLPasternakI. A review of airship structural research and development. Progr Aero Sci2009; 45: 83–96.
12.
DornheimMA. Lockheed Martin’s secretly built airship makes first flight. Aviation Week and Space Technology2006, pp. 5–5.
13.
Tatievsky A and Tsach S. Cargo airships prospective. In: 52nd Israel annual conference on aerospace sciences, Haifa, Israel, 29 February–1 March 2012.
14.
CarichnerGENicolaiLM. Fundamentals of aircraft and airship design: volume II, airship design, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013.
15.
Boyd RR. Performance of hybrid air vehicles. In: 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV, 14–17 January 2002, p.388. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
16.
MackrodtP-A. Further studies in the concept of delta-winged hybrid airships. J Aircraft1980; 17: 734–740.
17.
CalkinsD. Feasibility study of a hybrid airship operating in ground effect. J Aircraft1977; 14: 809–815.
18.
Agte J, Gan T, Kunzi F, et al. Conceptual design of a hybrid lift airship for intra-regional flexible access transport. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, 4–7 January, 2010, p. 1391. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
19.
LiJLvMSunKet al.Thermal insulation performance of lightweight substrate for solar array on stratospheric airships. Appl Therm Eng2016; 107: 1158–1165.
20.
Sun K, Liu C, Liang G, et al. Simulation analysis for solar array output characteristics on stratospheric airship. In: Power and energy systems and applications, Las Vegas, NV, 12–14 November 2012.
BradleyTHMoffittBAMavrisDNet al.Development and experimental characterization of a fuel cell powered aircraft. J Power Sourc2007; 171: 793–801.
24.
Yang M, Dongli MA, Yibo LI, et al. General parameters design method of buoyancy-lifting aerial vehicle. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica 2015; 36: 3567–3577.
25.
RomeoGFrullaGCestinoE. Design of a high-altitude long-endurance solar-powered unmanned air vehicle for multi-payload and operations. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2007; 221: 199–216.
26.
Skuza JR, Park Y, Kim HJ, et al. Feasibility study of cargo airship transportation systems powered by new green energy technologies. NASA Technical Report. Report no. NASA/TM-2014-218241, 1 April 2014. Hampton, VA: NASA.
27.
NojoumiHDincerINatererGF. Greenhouse gas emissions assessment of hydrogen and kerosene-fueled aircraft propulsion. Int J Hydrogen Energ2009; 34: 1363–1369.
28.
HaqueAUAsrarWOmarAAet al.Assessment of engine’s power budget for hydrogen powered hybrid buoyant aircraft. Propul Power Res2016; 5: 34–44.
29.
XuWLiQHuangM. Design and analysis of liquid hydrogen storage tank for high-altitude long-endurance remotely-operated aircraft. Int J Hydrogen Energ2015; 40: 16578–16586.
30.
KhandelwalBKarakurtASekaranPRet al.Hydrogen powered aircraft : the future of air transport. Progr Aero Sci2013; 60: 45–59.
31.
ContrerasAYiğitSÖzayKet al.Hydrogen as aviation fuel: a comparison with hydrocarbon fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energ1997; 22: 1053–1060.
32.
CecereDGiacomazziEIngenitoA. A review on hydrogen industrial aerospace applications. Int J Hydrogen Energ2014; 39: 10731–10747.
33.
WierzbanowskiT. Unmanned aircraft systems will provide access to the stratosphere. Defense Electron2006; 2: 12–16.
34.
Buerge BT. The scalability of heaviness fraction for large airships. In: AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology, Daytona Beach, FL, 25–28 March 2013.
35.
Carichner G and Nicolai LM. Hybrids . . . the airship messiah? In: AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology, Daytona Beach, FL, 25–28 March 2013.
36.
Ardema M. Feasibility of modern airships: design definition and performance of selected concepts. In: 13th Annual meeting and technical display incorporating the forum on the future of air transportation, Washington, DC, 10–13 January 1977.
37.
Lancaster JW. Feasibility study of modern airships, phase 1. Volume 4: appendices. Report no. NAS2-8643. August, 1975. Akron, OH: Goodyear Aerospace Corp.
38.
Lancaster JW. Feasibility study of modern airships, phase 1. Volume 2: parametric analysis (task 3). [lift, weight (mass). Report no. NAS2-8643. August, 1975. Akron, OH: Goodyear Aerospace Corp.
39.
LiuTLiouWSchulteM. Aeroship: a hybrid flight platform. J Aircraft2009; 46: 667–674.
40.
VermaARSagarKKPriyadarshiP. Optimum buoyant and aerodynamic lift for a lifting-body hybrid airship. J Aircraft2014; 51: 1345–1350.
41.
Zhang K, Han Z and Song B. Flight performance analysis of hybrid airship. In: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, paper no.AIAA-2009-901, Orlando, Florida, 5–8 January 2009.
42.
CerutiAMarzoccaP. Conceptual approach to unconventional airship design and synthesis. J Aero Eng2013; 27: 04014035–04014035.
43.
CarichnerGNicolaiLM. Fundamentals of aircraft and airship design: airship design and case studies, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013.
44.
Carichner G. The square-cube law revisited for airships. In: AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology (LTA) conference, Daytona Beach, FL, 25–28 March 2013, p.1340. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
45.
Haque AU, Asrar W, Omar AA, et al. Conceptual design of a winged hybrid airship. In: 21st AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–20 June 2014.
46.
HaqueAUAsrarWOmarAAet al.Effect of wing loading on gross takeoff mass of a hybrid buoyant aircraft. Int J Unmanned Syst Eng2016; 4: 11–22.
47.
Harper M. A hybrid airship concept for Naval missions. In: Aircraft systems and technology meeting, Dallas, TX, 27–29 September 1976.
48.
UlhaqueAAsrarWOmarAAet al.Aerostatic and aerodynamic modules of a hybrid buoyant aircraft: an analytical approach. IIUM Eng J2015; 16: 9–17.
49.
Nicolai LM, Carichner GE, Nicolai LM, et al. Airplanes and airships . . . evolutionary cousins. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Nashville, TN, 9–12 January 2012, p.1178. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
50.
AndanADAsrarWOmarAA. Investigation of aerodynamic parameters of a hybrid airship. J Aircraft2012; 49: 658–662.
51.
Alpman E and Long LN. Separated turbulent flow simulations using a Reynolds stress model and unstructured meshes. In: AIAA 43rd aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 10–13 January 2005, paper no. AIAA-2005-1094.
52.
Zhao D, Liu D, Sun K, et al. Research status, technical difficulties and development trend of stratospheric airship. 2016; 37: 45–56.
53.
Knaupp W and Mundschau E. Photovoltaic-hydrogen energy systems for stratospheric platforms. In: Photovoltaic energy conversion, 2003 proceedings of world conference, Osaka, Japan, Vol. 3, 11–18 May 2003, pp.2143–2147.
54.
LiGMaDYangM. Research of near space hybrid power airship with a novel method of energy storage. Int J Hydrogen Energ2015; 40: 9555–9562.
55.
KlugHGFaassR. Cryoplane: hydrogen fuelled aircraft—status and challenges. Air Space Eur2001; 3: 252–254.
56.
SinghRGohardaniASDoulgerisGet al.Liquid hydrogen tank considerations for turboelectric distributed propulsion. Aircraft Eng Aero Tech2013; 86: 67–75.
57.
Haifeng W, Bifeng S and Xiaoping Z. Configuration design and sizing optimization of a winged airship. In: International conference on network computing and information security, Guilin, China, 14–15 May 2011, pp.41–45, New York, NY: IEEE.
58.
RomeoGBorelloFCorreaGet al.ENFICA-FC: design of transport aircraft powered by fuel cell & flight test of zero emission 2-seater aircraft powered by fuel cells fueled by hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energ2013; 38: 469–479.
