Flying wings are one of the most promising concepts regarding the ever-increasing air traffic demand. Furthermore, they help improving economic efficiency and are environmentally friendly, both in terms of emissions and noise. In the first place, the paper deals about the initial design of a medium size C-type flying wing, of the 300-seat class, showing that the aircraft is operationally efficient, and can beat conventional airplanes of similar capacity. It specifically exhibits some considerable gains in field and cruise performances. Second, the paper addresses the potential of some emerging technologies, such as laminar flow control, vectored thrust, and active stability, which provide additional improvements and allow the simplification of the original configuration to a U-type arrangement. A preliminary assessment of emergency evacuation is included.
Long-term forecast of air traffic 2004–2025. Eurocon-trol, Brussels (B), 2005..
2.
Global market forecast 2004–2023. Airbus, Blagnac (F), 2005..
3.
Current market outlook 2004. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle (USA), 2004..
4.
AndersonJ. D.The airplane: A history of its technology, 2002 (AIAA, Reston, VA, USA).
5.
Martínez-ValR.PérezE.MuñozT.CuernoC.Design constraints in the payload-range diagram of ultrahigh capacity transport airplanes. J. Aircr., 1994, 31 (6), 1268–1272.
6.
VigneronY.Commercial aircraft for the 21st Century - A380 and beyond. AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition, Dayton, OH, USA, 2003, AIAA paper 2003–2886.
7.
StrohmayerA.SchmittD.Scenario based aircraft design evaluation. In Proceedings of 22nd ICAS Congress, Harrogate, UK, September 2000, CD-ROM, paper 5102.
8.
DenisovV. E.BolsunovskyA. L.BuzoveryaN. P.GurevichB. I.ShkadovL. M.Conceptual design for passenger airplane of very large passenger capacity in the flying wing layout. In Proceedings of 20th ICAS Congress, Sorrento, Italy, September 1996, vol. II, pp. 1305–1311.
9.
McMastersJ. H.KrooI. M.Advanced configurations for very large transport airplanes. Aircraft Des., 1998, 1 (4), 217–242.
10.
MialonB.FolT.BonnaudC.Aerodynamic optimization of subsonic flying wing configurations. 20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, St Louis, MO, USA, 2002, AIAA paper 2002–2931.
11.
LiebeckR. H.Design of the blended-wing-body subsonic transport. J. Aircr., 2004, 41, 10–25.
12.
BolsunovskiA. L.BuzoveryaN. P.GurevichB. I.DenisovV. E.SoninO. V.Flying wing - problems and decisions. In Lecture Series Course on Innovative configurations and advanced concepts for future civil aircraft (Eds TorenbeekE.DeconinckH.), 2005, paper no. 9 (Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genese (B)).
13.
Martinez-ValR.PerezE.Medium size flying wings. In Lecture Series Course on Innovative configurations and advanced concepts for future civil aircraft (Eds TorenbeekE.DeconinckH.), 2005, paper no. 8 (Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genese (B)).
14.
Martínez-ValR.SchoepE.Flying wing versus conventional transport airplane: The 300 seat case. In Proceedings of 22nd ICAS Congress, Harrogate, UK, September 2000, CD-ROM, paper 113.
15.
Martinez-ValR.Martinez CabezaJ. A.PerezE.Flying wing and emerging technologies: An efficient matching. In Proceedings of 24th ICAS Congress, Yokohama, Japan, August-September 2004, CD-ROM, paper 1.3.2.
16.
IsikverenA. T.Identifying economically optimal flight techniques of transport aircraft. J. Aircr., 2002, 39 (45), 528–544.
17.
Annex 14. Part 1 Aerodromes, 2003, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal (CND).
18.
HoweD.Aircraft conceptual design synthesis, 2000, pp. 118–127, 315, and 317. (Professional Engineering Publishing, London, UK).
19.
MukhopadhyayV.Structural concept study of non-circular fuselage configuration. AIAA/SAE World Aviation Congress, Los Angeles, USA, October 1996, paper WAC-67.
20.
RodríguezC.Martínez-ValR.GutiérrezL.Structural weight estimation of a flying wing with a pressurized torque box. In Proceedings of 4th International Seminar on Recent research and design progress in aeronautical engineering and its influence on education, Warsaw, Poland, Part 1, November 2000, pp. 177–182.
21.
Part 25. Airworthiness Standards: Transport category airplanes. Code of federal regulations. Title 14. Aeronautics and space. Office of the General Register, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
22.
WittmannR.Passenger acceptance of BWB configurations. In Proceedings of 24th ICAS Congress, Yokohama, Japan, CD-ROM, August 2004, paper 1.3.3.
23.
TorenbeekE.Synthesis of subsonic airplane design, 1982, pp. 145–148, 309, and 318–320 (Delft University Press, Delft).
24.
RoskamJ.Airplane design. Part I. Preliminary sizing of airplanes, 1985, pp. 98 (Roskam Aviation, Ottawa, KA, USA).
25.
McCormickB. W.Aerodynamics, aeronautics and flight mechanics, 2nd edition, 1995 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
26.
Martínez-ValR.PérezE.Optimum cruise lift coefficient in initial design of jet aircraft. J. Aircr., 1992, 29, 712–714.
27.
RoskamJ.Airplane design. Part 5. Component weight estimation, 1985 (Roskam Aviation, Ottawa, KA, USA).
28.
RoskamJ.Airplane Design. Part 7. Determination of stability, control and performance characteristics: FAR and military requirements, 1988, p. 293 (Roskam Aviation, Ottawa, KA, USA).
29.
PamadiB. N.Performance, stability, dynamics and control of airplanes, 1998 (AIAA, Reston, VA, USA).
TaskinogluE. S.KnightD.Numerical analysis of submerged inlets. 20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, St Louis, MO, USA, 2002, AIAA paper 2002–3147.
35.
Martínez CabezaJ. A.La tobera vectorial de ITP. Revista de Aeronáutica y Astronáutica, 1998, 676, 697–701.
36.
SauvinetF.Longitudinal active stability: Key issues for future large transport aircraft. In Proceedings of 22nd ICAS Congress, Harrogate, UK, September 2000, CD-ROM, paper 4101.
37.
JAR-OPS 1.Commercial air transportation (aero-planes). Amendment 9. European Aviation Safety Agency, 2005.
38.
Martínez-ValR.PérezE.Extended range operations of two and three turbofan engined airplanes. J. Aircr., 1993, 30, 382–386.
39.
Certification specifications for large aeroplanes CS-25. Amendment 1. European Aviation Safety Agency, 2005..
40.
Martínez-ValR.HedoJ. M.Analysis of evacuation strategies for design and certification of transport airplanes. J. Aircr., 2000, 37 (3), 440–447.
41.
WillcoxK.WakayamaS.Simultaneous optimization of a multiple-aircraft family. J. Aircr., 2003, 40 (4), 616–622.
