Morphing wing optimization for steady level flight

Abstract

This paper presents the basic results of the morphing wing planform optimization of an experimental unmanned air vehicle for minimum drag at steady level flight. The aerodynamic design tool that consists of the three-dimensional panel method, two-dimensional boundary layer solution and generalized reduced gradient method-based optimization is appropriate for fixed wing and morphing wing conceptual and preliminary design. The morphing concept is implemented into the solution with the geometric constraints of the wing planform and the airfoil shape design variables. The drag that is created by other components of the aircraft is calculated according to empirical formulas. Wing drag and aircraft drag comparisons between baseline wing (BASE), optimum fixed wing and morphing wing are discussed with the obtained planform and airfoil shapes.

Keywords

Morphing wing panel method boundary layer flow optimization low-speed aerodynamics conceptual airplane design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wlezien RW, Horner GC, McGowan AR, et al. The aircraft morphing program. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, Long Beach, CA, USA, 20 April–23 April 1998, AIAA Paper 98-1927.

Weisshaar TA. Morphing aircraft technology–new shapes for aircraft design. Report, Purdue University, USA, October 2006.

Blondeau J, Richeson J and Pines DJ. Design, development and testing of a morphing aspect ratio wing using an inflatable telescopic spar. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 7–10 April 2003, AIAA Paper 2003-1718.

Boria

Stanford

Bowman

et al.

Evolutionary optimization of a morphing wing with wind-tunnel hardware in the loop. AIAA J 2009; 47: 399–409.

Gamboa

Vale

Lau

FJP

et al.

Optimization of a morphing wing based on coupled aerodynamic and structural constraints. AIAA J 2009; 47: 2087–2104.

Körpe DS. Aerodynamic modeling and optimization of morphing wings. PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, TUR, 2014.

Katz

Plotkin

. Low-speed aerodynamics, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 353–353.

Deperrois A. XFLR5 Analysis of foils and wings operating at low Reynolds numbers. Guidelines for XFLR5, October 2009.

Deperrois A. About XFLR5 calculations and experimental measurements, http://www.xflr5.com/docs/Results_vs_Prediction.pdf (2009, accessed 5 September 2010).

10.

Moran J. An introduction to theoretical and computational aerodynamics. 1st ed. New York: Dover Publications Inc., 1984, pp.206–209.

11.

Hepperle M. JAVAFOIL user’s guide. User's manual, March 2014.

12.

Eppler R and Somers DM. A computer program for the design and analysis of low-speed airfoils. Report, NASA, Report no. NASA TM-81862, USA, December 1980.

13.

Moran J. An introduction to theoretical and computational aerodynamics. 1st ed. New York: Dover Publications Inc., 1984, pp.219–225.

14.

Drela M and Youngren H. XFOIL, version 6.96 Documentation, 2001.

15.

Raymer

. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach, 2nd ed. Washington: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, 1992, pp. 280–287.

16.

Raymer

. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach, 2nd ed. Washington: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, 1992, pp. 150–150.

17.

Roskam

. Airplane design, volume vi: preliminary calculation of aerodynamic, thrust, and power characteristics, 1st ed. Kansas: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corp., 1987, pp. 46–46.

18.

Ravindran

Ragsdell

Reklaitis

. Engineering optimization: methods and applications, 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006, pp. 406–406.

19.

Rao

. Engineering optimization: theory and practice, 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2009, pp. 412–422.

20.

Ibrahim

Chinneck

. Improving solver success in reaching feasibility for sets of nonlinear constraints. Comput Oper Res 2008; 35: 1394–1411.

21.

Vanderplaats

. Multidiscipline design optimization, 1st ed. California: Vanderplaats Research and Development Inc., 2007, pp. 238–238.