Dynamic combustion characteristics of a rectangular scramjet combustor with single-side expansion were studied experimentally and numerically. Experiments were implemented with an isolator entrance Mach number of 3.46, and an air stagnation temperature of 1430 K. Ethylene was utilized to fuel the combustor over an equivalence ratio range of 0.20 < φ < 0.63. Results indicated that the combustion modes varied from different equivalence ratios. For an intermediate φ = 0.375, an intermittent dynamic combustion occurred. During the dynamic process, the flame sometimes stabilized in the jet wake of the top cavity, and at other time it oscillated between dual parallel cavities. The pseudo-shock train traveled periodically along the length of the combustor, and the penetration depths of the two injectors exchanged. Quantitative analysis illustrated that the average frequency of unsteady combustion was approximately 200 Hz. The reason for the occurrence of the self-sustained dynamic process was related to the interactions between the shock-induced separated region and heat release.
SegalC. The scramjet engine: Processes and characteristics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
3.
Ben-YakarAHansonRK. Cavity Flame-holders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets: An overview. J Propul Power2001; 17: 869–877.
4.
GruberMRDonbarJMCarterCD. Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow. J Propul Power2004; 20: 769–778.
5.
Daniel M, Sean T and James D. Heat release distribution in a dual-mode scramjet combustor - measurements and modeling. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Bremen, Germany, AIAA Paper No. 2009-7362, 2009.
6.
Denis SR, Kau H, Brandstetter A, et al. Experimental study on transition between ramjet and scramjet modes in a dual-mode combustor. In: 12th AIAA international conference, space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies, Norfolk, VA, USA, AIAA Paper No. 2003-7048, 2003.
7.
KandaTChinzeiNKudoK. Dual-mode operations in a scramjet combustor. J Propul Power2004; 20: 760–763.
8.
Chun J, Scheuermann T, von Wolfersdorf J, et al. Experimental study on combustion mode transition in a scramjet with parallel injection. In: 14th AIAA/AHI space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Canberra, Australia, AIAA Paper No. 2006-8063, 2006.
9.
ChoiJ-YMaFYangV. Combustion oscillations in a scramjet engine combustor with transverse fuel injection. Proc Combust Inst2005; 30: 2851–2858.
10.
FotiaMLDriscollJF. Ram-scram transition and flame/shock-train interactions in a model scramjet experiment. J Propul Power2013; 29: 261–273.
11.
LinK-CJacksonKBehdadniaR. Acoustic characterization of an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor with a cavity flameholder. J Propul Power2010; 26: 1161–1170.
12.
MickaDJDriscollJF. Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder. Proc Combust Inst2009; 32: 2397–2404.
13.
Micka DJ. Combustion stabilization, structure, and spreading in a laboratory dual-mode scramjet combustor. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, USA, 2010.
14.
WangZ-GSunM-BWangH-B. Mixing-related low frequency oscillation of combustion in an ethylene-fueled supersonic combustor. Proc Combust Inst2015; 35: 2137–2144.
15.
LevyYHesselinkLDeganiD. Anomalous asymmetries in flows generated by algorithms that fail to conserve symmetry. AIAA J1995; 33: 999–1007.
16.
Rodriquez C. Asymmetry effects in numerical simulation of supersonic flows with upstream separated regions. In: 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, VA, USA, AIAA Paper No. 2001-0084, 2001.
17.
Mohieldin T, Tiwari S and Olynciw M. Asymmetric flow-structures in dual mode scramjet combustor with significant upstream interaction. In: 37th joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, AIAA Paper No. 2001-3296, 2001.
18.
Lance J, Campbell C and Andrew D. Cavity-based injector mixing experiments for supersonic combustors with implications on igniter placement. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Sacramento, California, USA, AIAA Paper No. 2006-5268, 2006.
19.
Gruber MR. Fundamental investigations of an integrated fuel injector/flameholder concept for supersonic combustion. DTIC Document, 1998.
20.
SunM-BZhongZLiangJ-H. Experimental investigation of supersonic model combustor with distributed injection of supercritical kerosene. J Propul Power2014; 30: 1537–1542.
21.
ZhongZWangZSunM. Effects of fuel cracking on combustion characteristics of a supersonic model combustor. Acta Astronaut2015; 110: 1–8.
22.
Sun M-B, Zhong Z, Gao T-Y, et al. Asymmetric combustion characteristics of transverse ethylene injection in a rectangular supersonic combustor with single-side expansion. In: AIAA propulsion and energy forum and exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2016.
23.
WangHWangZSunM. Experimental study of oscillations in a scramjet combustor with cavity flameholders. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2013; 45: 259–263.
24.
SunM-BGengHLiangJ-H. Flame characteristics in supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholder. J Propul Power2008; 24: 688–696.
25.
SunM-BLeiJWuH-Y. Flow patterns and mixing characteristics of gaseous fuel multiple injections in a non-reacting supersonic combustor. Heat Mass Transfer2011; 47: 1499–1516.
26.
WangHWangZSunM. Simulations of combustion with normal and angled hydrogen injection in a cavity-based supersonic combustor. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2014; 228: 530–541.
27.
WestbrookCKDryerFL. Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames. Combust Sci Technol1981; 27: 31–43.
28.
DoerfferPCharlesHDussaugeJP. Unsteady effects of shock wave induced separation, New York: Springer, 2010.
