This paper describes two systems that can be used to obtain realistic random traffic samples in a terminal area: a real traffic analyser and a synthetic traffic generator. These two systems allow the air traffic management (ATM) engineer to gain insight on the traffic structure of the area under analysis, and allow obtaining realistic traffic samples enabling the evaluation of new operational concepts, the validation or system performance measurement after procedure changes, the analysis of ATM performance under forecasted future traffic changes, etc. Together with the design of the system, the work provides insight of user interfaces and describes the potential uses of such tools in an integrated ATM system.
Domino DA, Tuomey D, Stassen HP, et al. Paired approaches to closely spaced runways: Results of pilot and ATC simulation. In: 33rd IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference (DASC), Prague, Czech Republic, 2014, pp.1B2–1–1B2–15.
2.
Penhallegon WJ and Bone RS. Flight deck-based merging and spacing impact on flight crew operations during continuous descent arrivals and approaches. In: 27th IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference, St. Paul, MN, USA, 2008, pp.3.C.3–1–3.C.3–14.
3.
Ho N, Johnson W, Arutyunov V, et al. Design and evaluation of NextGen aircraft separation assurance concepts. In: 31st IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference (DASC), Williamsburg, VA, USA, 2012, pp.4D1–1–4D1–12.
4.
Alliot J-M, Granger G and Pomeret J-M. Arithmetic simulation and performance metrics [ATC]. In: Proceedings of 21st digital avionics systems conference, Irvine, CA, USA, 2002, pp.2D2–1–2D2–6.
5.
MohlejiSCHoffmanJ. Performance analysis of North Pacific Operations using an automated air traffic control system simulation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol1993; 1: 179–185.
6.
Calderon-Meza G, Sherry L and Consiglio M. Multi-agent simulation of NAS infrastructure utilization in the presence of airline policies. In: Integrated communications, navigation and surveillance conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2009, pp.1–7.
7.
Sislak D, Volf P, Kopriva S, et al. Agentfly: NAS-wide simulation framework integrating algorithms for automated collision avoidance. In: Integrated communications, navigation and surveillance conference (ICNS), Herndon, VA, USA, 2011, pp.F7–1–F7–11.
8.
Hughes KK, Wu CY, Lamp JL, et al. Optimizing airport arrival operations: A systems engineering analysis of Washington Dulles International Airport. In: 2012 IEEE systems and information design symposium (SIEDS), Charlottesville, VA, USA, 2012, pp.145–149.
9.
TofukujiN. An enroute ATC simulation experiment for sector capacity estimation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol1993; 1: 138–143.
10.
Ferrante J and Johnson C. Balancing Air Traffic Control workload across dual area navigation arrival procedures. In: Integrated communications, navigation and surveillance conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2009, pp.1–11.
11.
Teutsch J and Hoffman E. Aircraft in the future ATM system - exploiting the 4D aircraft trajectory. In: 23rd Digital avionics systems conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2004, pp.3.B.2–31–22.
12.
Miller ME, Capozzi B, Guzhva V, et al. Airborne execution of flow strategies simulation. In: 33rd IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference (DASC), Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 2014, pp.1D1–1–1D1–6.
13.
SESAR | Partnering for smarter aviation, http://www.sesarju.eu/ (accessed 10 March 2015).
FabryJMLupinettiAA. Applications of simulation and artificial intelligence technology for ATC training. Proc IEEE1989; 77: 1762–1765.
16.
ScardinaJARybergP-YGerstenfeldA. Future ATC automation aids based upon AI technology. Proc IEEE1989; 77: 1625–1633.
17.
KorneckiAJHilburnTBDiefenbachTW. Intelligent tutoring issues for air traffic control training. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol1993; 1: 204–211.
18.
Mo S, Li H, He X, et al. Development of the ATC Simulators. In: 16th international conference on artificial reality and telexistence–workshops, ICAT '06, Hangzhou, China, 2006, pp.333–338.
19.
Johnson DR, Nenov VI and Espinoza G. Automatic speech semantic recognition and verification in air traffic control. In: 32nd IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference (DASC), East Syracuse, NY, USA, 2013, pp.5B5–1–5B5–14.
20.
Gillet S, Nuic A and Mouillet V. Enhancement in realism of ATC simulations by improving aircraft behaviour models. In: 29th IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference (DASC), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2010, pp.2.D.4–1–2.D.4–13.
21.
Volf P, Jakubüv J, Koranda L, et al. Validation of an air-traffic controller behavioral model for fast time simulation. In: Integrated communications, navigation and surveillance conference (ICNS), Herndon, VA, USA, 2014, pp.T1–1–T1–9.
22.
Oaks R, Liu S, Zhou D, et al. Methodology for the generation of air traffic scenarios based on recorded traffic data. In: 22nd digital avionics systems conference, DASC '03, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2003, pp.5.C.3–5.1–7.
BesadaJAFronteraGCrespoJ. Automated aircraft trajectory prediction based on formal intent-related language processing. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2013; 14: 1067–1082.
25.
Besada JA, Portillo J, de Miguel G, et al. Traffic analysis and synthetic scenario generation for ATM operational concepts evaluation. In: 28th IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference, DASC '09, Orlando, FL, USA, 2009, pp.2.A.1–1–2.A.1–14.
