The paper presents the design and the experimental validation of a position controller for a morphing wing application. The actuation mechanism uses two DC motors to rotate two eccentric shafts which morph a flexible skin along two parallel actuation lines. In this way, the developed controller aim is to control the shape of a wing airfoil under different flow conditions. In order to control the actuators positions, a proportional–derivative control algorithm is used. The morphing wing system description, its actuation system structure, the control design, and its validation are highlighted in this paper. The results, obtained both by numerical simulation and experimental validation, are obtained following the control design and its validation. An analysis of the wind flow characteristics is included as a supplementary validation; the pressure coefficients obtained through numerical simulation for several desired airfoil shapes are compared with those obtained through measurements for the experimentally obtained airfoil shapes under different flow conditions.
International Air Transport Association. The International Air Transport Association Roadmap, 3rd edn. Miami, FL: IATA, June 2009.
2.
GamboaPValeJLauFJP. Optimization of a morphing wing based on coupled aerodynamic and structural constraints. AIAA J2009; 47: 2087–2104.
3.
BilCMasseyKAbdullahEJ. Wing morphing control with shape memory alloy actuators. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2013; 24: 879–898.
4.
MoosavianAXiFHashemiSM. Design and motion control of fully variable morphing wings. J Aircraft2013; 50: 1189–1201.
5.
Ursache NM, Keane AJ and Bressloff NW. On the design of morphing airfoils using spinal structures. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, 1–4 May 2006.
6.
Majji M, Rediniotis OK and Junkins JL. Design of a morphing wing: modeling and experiments. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA, 2007.
7.
HeYGuoS. Modeling and experiment of a morphing wing integrated with a trailing edge control actuation system. Chin J Mech Eng2012, pp. 25.
8.
De GaspariARicciS. A two-level approach for the optimal design of morphing wings based on compliant structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2011; 22: 1091–1111.
9.
Vos R, Barrett R, Krakers L, et al. Post-Buckled Precompressed (PBP) piezoelectric actuators for UAV flight control. In: Matsuzaki Y (ed.) Smart structures and materials: Smart structures and integrated systems, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6173, 61730E, 2006.
10.
PrevitaliFErmanniP. Performance of a non-tapered 3D morphing wing with integrated compliant ribs. Smart Mater Struct2012, pp. 21.
11.
Debiasi M, Bouremel Y, Khoo HH, et al. Deformation of the upper surface of an airfoil by macro fiber composite actuators. In: 30th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, June 2012. AIAA Paper 2012-3206.
12.
Debiasi M, Bouremel Y, Lu Z, et al. Deformation of the upper and lower surfaces of an airfoil by macro fiber composite actuators. In: 31st AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 24–27 June 2013.
13.
BilgenOKochersbergerKBInmanDJ. Wing morphing design using macro-fiber composites. In: Elajjar R, Saponara VL and Muliana A (eds) Smart composites: Mechanics and design, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2013, pp. 169–212. .
14.
ZhaoKSchmiedelerJPMurrayAP. Design of planar, shape-changing rigid-body mechanisms for morphing aircraft wings. J Mech Robot2012, pp. 4.
15.
Botez RM, Molaret P and Laurendeau E. Laminar flow control on a research wing project presentation covering a three year period. In: Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute Annual General Meeting, 2007.
16.
GrigorieTLBotezRMPopovAV. A hybrid fuzzy logic proportional-integral-derivative and conventional on-off controller for morphing wing actuation using shape memory alloy, Part 1: Morphing system mechanisms and controller architecture design. Aeronaut J2012; 116: 433–449.
17.
Sainmont C, Paraschivoiu I and Coutu D. Multidisciplinary approach for the optimization of a laminar airfoil equipped with a morphing upper surface. In: Symposium on morphing vehicles, NATO VT-168, Evora, Portugal, 2009.
18.
Coutu D, Brailovski V, Terriault P, et al. Experimental validation of the 3D numerical model for an adaptive laminar wing with flexible extrados. In: 18th International conference of adaptive structures and technologies, ICAST, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 3–5 October 2007.
19.
PopovAVGrigorieTLBotezRM. Closed-loop control validation of a morphing wing using wind tunnel tests. AIAA J Aircraft2010; 47: 1309–1317.
20.
Grigorie TL, Botez RM and Popov AV. Fuzzy logic control of a smart actuation system in a morphing wing. In: Iqbal S, Boumella N and Garcia JCF (eds) Fuzzy controllers -- Recent advances in theory and applications. InTech, 2012, 22 pp. ISBN 978-953-51-0759-0.
21.
Grigorie TL, Popov AV, Botez RM, et al. A morphing wing used shape memory alloy actuators new control technique with bi-positional and PI laws optimum combination. Part 1: Design phase. In: 7th International conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics ICINCO 2010, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 15–18 June 2010.
22.
Grigorie TL, Popov AV, Botez RM, et al. A morphing wing used shape memory alloy actuators new control technique with bi-positional and PI laws optimum combination. Part 2: Experimental validation. In: 7th International conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics ICINCO 2010, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 15–18 June 2010.
23.
GrigorieTLBotezRM. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based controllers for smart material actuator modeling. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2009; 223: 655–668.
24.
PopovAVGrigorieTLBotezRM. Modeling and testing of a morphing wing in open-loop architecture. AIAA J Aircraft2010; 47: 917–923.
25.
PopovAVLabibMFaysJ. Closed loop control simulations on a morphing laminar airfoil using shape memory alloys actuators. AIAA J Aircraft2008; 45: 1794–1803.
26.
PopovAVGrigorieTLBotezRM. Real time morphing wing optimization validation using wind-tunnel tests. AIAA J Aircraft2010; 47: 1346–1355.
27.
PopovAVBotezRMMamouM. Optical sensor pressure measurements variations with temperature in wind tunnel testing. AIAA J Aircraft2009; 46: 1314–1318.
28.
Grigorie TL, Popov AV and Botez RM. Control strategies for an experimental morphing wing model. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, AIAA Aviation 2014, Atlanta, GA, 16–18 June 2014.
29.
Sainmont C, Paraschivoiu I, Coutu D, et al. Boundary layer behaviour on a morphing airfoil: Simulation and wind tunnel tests. In: Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute AERO Conference Aerodynamics Symposium, 2009.
30.
GrigorieTLPopovAVBotezRM. On-off proportional-integral-controller for a morphing wing. Part 1: Actuation mechanism and control design. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 226: 131–145.
31.
GrigorieTLPopovAVBotezRM. On-off proportional-integral-controller for a morphing wing. Part 2: Control validation-numerical simulations and experimental tests. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 226: 146–162.
32.
GrigorieTLPopovAVBotezRM. A hybrid fuzzy logic proportional-integral-derivative and conventional on-off controller for morphing wing actuation using shape memory alloy. Part 2: Controller implementation and validation. Aeronaut J2012; 116: 451–465.
33.
JanochaH. Actuators: Basics and applications, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004.
34.
Gomis-BellmuntOCampanileLF. Design rules for actuators in active mechanical systems, London: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
35.
Michaud F, Joncas S and Botez R. Design manufacturing and testing of a small-scale composite morphing wing. In: 19th Conference on composite materials, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2013.
36.
FranklinGFPowellJEmami-NaeiniA. Feedback control of dynamic systems, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
37.
OgataK. Modern control engineering, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
38.
DorfRCBishopR. Modern control systems, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall, 2008.
39.
PhillipsCLHarborRD. Feedback control systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall, 1996.
40.
ZieglerJGNicholsNB. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. ASME Trans1942; 64: 759–765.
41.
MosbahBAFlores SalinasMBotezRM. New methodology for wind tunnel calibration. SAE Int J Aerospace2013, pp. 6.
42.
Drela M and Youngren H. XFOIL, version 6.96 Documentation.
43.
Drela M. Implicit implementation of the full and transition criterion. In: 21st Applied aerodynamics conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 2003, pp.1–8.
44.
PopovAVBotezRMLabibM. Transition point detection from the surface pressure distribution for controller design. AIAA J Aircraft2008; 45: 23–28.
45.
Sugar Gabor O, Koreanschi A and Botez RM. Low–speed aerodynamic characteristics improvement of the ATR-42 airfoil using a wing approach. In: IECON2012 conference, Montréal, Canada, 25–28 October 2012.
46.
TranD-MLiauzunCFrequency and time domain fluid-structure coupling methods for turbomachineries. In: KCHallREKielbJPThomas (eds). Unsteady aerodynamics, aeroacoustics and aeroelasticity of turbomachines, New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 397–408.
