The rotorcraft industry faces a number of challenges today regarding the replacement of ageing airframes, an expansion in the operational roles of helicopters and a requirement to improve safety whilst reducing the environmental impact of rotorcraft operations. The quantification of simulation fidelity underpins the confidence required for the expanding use of modelling and simulation to develop solutions to these challenges in a timely and cost-efficient manner. Current simulator certification standards do not provide a fully quantitative method for assessing simulation fidelity, especially in a research environment. This article details the commissioning and acceptance process of the new research flight simulation facility at the University of Liverpool, HELIFLIGHT-R, and its subsequent use in a research project ‘Lifting Standards: A Novel Approach to the Development of Fidelity Criteria for Rotorcraft Flight Simulators’ aimed at developing new predicted and perceptual measures of simulator fidelity. Some initial results from both piloted simulation and flight tests using the Bell 412 Advanced Systems Research Aircraft are reported within the context of the rotorcraft simulation fidelity project.
Strategic research agenda. Vol. 1. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe, October 2002.
2.
Anon. Helicopter safety-potential mitigation measures. In: AHS 62nd annual forum & technology display, International Helicopter Safety Team, Helicopter Safety Special Session, Phoenix, AZ, 8–11 May 2006.
3.
Advani SK and Wilkinson CH. Dynamic interface modelling and simulation - a unique challenge. In: Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society conference on helicopter flight simulation. London, UK, November 2001.
4.
Hodge SJ, Padfield GD and Southworth MR. Helicopter-ship dynamic interface simulation: fidelity at low-cost. In: Proceedings of the cutting costs in flight simulation – balancing quality and capability, RAeS conference, London, UK, November 2006, pp.24–40.
5.
Hodge SJ, Forrest J, Padfield GD, et al. Determining fidelity standards for maritime rotorcraft simulation. In Proceedings of the maritime operations of rotorcraft, RAeS conference, Hamilton Place, London, UK, 11–12 June 2008.
6.
HessRAMalsburyT. Closed loop assessment of flight simulator fidelity. J Guid Control Dyn1991; 14(1): 191–197.
7.
HessRASiwakositW. Assessment of flight simulator fidelity in multi-axis tasks including visual cue quality. J Aircr2001; 38(4): 607–614.
8.
SchroederJAChungWWYHessRA. Evaluation of motion fidelity criterion with visual scene changes. J Aircr2000; 37(4): 580–587.
9.
Padfield GD, Charlton MT and McCallum AT. The fidelity of Hi-fi lynx on the DERA advanced flight simulator using ADS-33 handling qualities metrics. Report no. DRA/AS/FDS/TR96103/1, 1996, pp.1–152.
10.
McCallum AT and Charlton MT. Structured approach to helicopter simulator acceptance. In: Proceedings of the challenge of realistic rotorcraft simulation, RAeS, London, UK, 7–8 November 2001.
11.
Anon. Handling qualities requirements for military rotorcraft. ADS-33E-PRF, 21 March 2000. Washington, DC: US Army.
12.
Roscoe MF and Thompson JH. JSHIP’s dynamic interface modelling and simulation systems: a simulation of the UH-60A helicopter/LHA shipboard environment task. In: Proceedings of the 59th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, AZ, 6–8 May 2003.
Anon. Helicopter flight simulation training devices. Report no. JAR-FSTD H, May 2008. Joint Aviation Authorities.
15.
Anon. Helicopter simulator qualification. FAA Advisory Circular no. AC120-63, November 1994. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Authority.
16.
Padfield GD, Casolaro D, Hamers M, et al. Validation criteria for helicopter real-time simulation models; sketches from the work of GARTEUR HC-AG12. In: Proceedings of the 30th European rotorcraft forum, Marseilles, France, 14–16 September 2004.
17.
Padfield GD, Pavel M, Casolaro D, et al. Fidelity of helicopter real-time models. In: Proceedings of the 61st annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Grapevine, TX, 1–3 June, 2005.
18.
PadfieldGDWhiteMD. Measuring simulation fidelity through an adaptive pilot model. Aerosp Sci Technol2005; 9(5): 400–408.
19.
White MD and Padfield GD. Progress with the adaptive pilot model in simulation fidelity. In: Proceedings of the 50th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Baltimore, MD, 7–10 June 2004.
20.
Manual of criteria for the qualification of flight simulation training devices. Vol. I – Aeroplanes, 3rd ed. Doc 9625 AN/938. 2009, Montreal, QC, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
21.
PadfieldGDWhiteMD. Flight simulation in academia: HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation at the University of Liverpool. Aeronaut J R Aeronaut Soc2003; 107(1075): 529–538.
22.
Duval RW. A real-time multi-body dynamics architecture for rotorcraft simulation. In: Proceedings of the challenge of realistic rotorcraft simulation, RAeS Conference, London, UK, 7–8 November 2001.
23.
MeyerMPadfieldGD. First steps in the development of handling qualities criteria for a civil tilt rotor. J Am Helicopter Soc2005; 50(1): 33–46.
24.
ManimalaBPadfieldGDWalkerDJ. Load alleviation for a tilt rotor aircraft in airplane mode. J Aircr2006; 43(1): 147–156.
25.
Jump M and Padfield GD. Development of a nature-inspired flare command algorithm. In: Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, Marriott Hilton Head Beach and Golf Resort, Hilton Head Island, SC, 20–23 August 2007.
26.
PadfieldGDClarkGTaghizadA. How long do pilots look forward? Prospective visual guidance in terrain-hugging flight. J Am Helicopter Soc2007; 52(2): 134–145.
27.
PadfieldGD. Flight handling qualities a problem-based-learning module for final year aerospace engineering students. Aeronaut J2006; 11(1104): 73–84.
28.
White MD. and Padfield GD. Statement of requirements for a second flight simulator facility at the University of Liverpool. FS&T internal report, June 2006. Liverpool, UK: The University of Liverpool.
29.
Bickerstaff IH. Portrait of landscape: a visualisation solution for military aircraft development. In: Proceedings of the 1998 image conference, Scottsdale, AZ, 2–7 August 1998.
30.
Bas Gouverneur JA, Mulder MM, Van Paassen R, et al. Optimisation of the SIMONA research simulator’s motion filter settings for handling qualities experiments. In: Proceedings of the AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, Austin, TX, 11–14 August 2003, AIAA Paper no. 2003-5679.
ManimalaBJWalkerDJPadfieldGD. Rotorcraft simulation modelling and validation for control law design. Aeronaut J R Aeronaut Soc2007; 111: 77–88.
33.
White MD, Perfect P, Padfield GD, et al. Progress in the development of unified fidelity metrics for rotorcraft flight simulators. In: Proceedings of the 66th annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, AZ, 11–13 May 2010.
34.
PetersDAHeC. Finite state induced flow models part II: three dimensional rotor disk. J Aircr1995; 32(2): 323–333.
35.
Bailey FJ. A simplified theoretical method of determining the characteristics of a lifting rotor in forward flight. NACA Report no. 716, 1941. Washington, DC: The National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
36.
AshleyHWindallSLandahlMT. New directions in lifting surface theory. AIAA J1965; 3(1): 3–16.
GubbelsAWCarignanSJRP. The NRC Bell 412 advanced systems research aircraft – a new facility for airborne simulation. Can Aeronaut Space J2000; 11(4): 106–115.
39.
Gubbels AW and Ellis DK. NRC Bell 412 ASRA FBW systems description in ATA100 format. Report no. Ltr-Fr-163, April 2000. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Council of Canada.
40.
Cooper GE and Harper Jr RP. The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. NASA Technical note no. TN-D-5153, April 1969. Washington, DC: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
41.
Manimala BJ, Padfield GD, Walker DJ, et al. Load alleviation in tilt rotor aircraft through active control; modelling and control concepts. In: Proceedings of the 59th American Helicopter Society annual forum, Phoenix, AZ, 6–8 May 2003.
42.
Perfect P, Timson E, White MD, et al. A rating scale for subjective assessment of simulator fidelity. In: Proceedings of the 37th European rotorcraft forum, Gallarate, Italy, 13–15 September 2011.
43.
White MD, Perfect P, Padfield GD, et al. Progress in the development of unified fidelity metrics for rotorcraft flight simulators. In: Proceedings of the 65th AHS forum, Phoenix, AZ, 11–13 May 2010.
44.
Perfect P, White MD Padfield GD, et al. Integrating predicted and perceived fidelity for flight simulators. In: Proceedings of the 36th European rotorcraft forum, Paris, France, 7–9 September 2010.
