This study investigates the dynamic behaviour and mitigation strategies for railway bridge transition zones, which are critical regions prone to accelerated track degradation due to abrupt changes in substructure stiffness and damping. Such zones experience heightened train impact forces, leading to increased vibrations and differential settlements that compromise safety and necessitate frequent maintenance. Through the development and validation of detailed 3D numerical models calibrated with field data, this research examines the influence of train speed, axle load, and transit direction on track stability under high-speed and heavy freight conditions. The findings reveal that increasing train speed and axle load significantly exacerbate vibrations and track settlements, elevating derailment risks. Notably, the application of micropiles beneath the track at approach zones demonstrates a substantial reduction in differential settlements up to 57%, surpassing many existing mitigation techniques. Additionally, optimising micropile dimensions and spacing effectively diminishes dynamic forces at the track-bridge interface, thereby enhancing the overall stability and safety of high-speed and heavy freight railway operations across transition zones.
WangH. Measurement, assessment, analysis and improvement of transition zones in railway track. Delft University of Technology, 2019. PhD Thesis.
2.
IndraratnaBSajjadMBNgoT, et al.Improved performance of ballasted tracks at transition zones: a review of experimental and modelling approaches. Transp Geotechn2019; 21: 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100260
3.
LiDOtterDCarrG. Railway bridge approaches under heavy axle load traffic: problems, causes, and remedies. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2010; 224(5): 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097jrrt345
WangHMarkineV. Dynamic behaviour of the track in transitions zones considering the differential settlement. J Sound Vib2019; 459: 114863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114863
8.
IndraratnaBRujikiatkamjornCNimbalkarS. Use of geosynthetics in railways including geocomposites and vertical drains. Geo-Frontiers, 2011.
9.
NavaratnarajahSKIndraratnaBNgoNT. Influence of under sleeper pads on ballast behavior under cyclic loading: experimental and numerical studies. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng2018; 144(9): 04018068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001954
10.
PaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR. Design and construction of backfills for railway track transition zones. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2013; 229(1): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713499016
11.
PunethaPNimbalkarS. Numerical investigation on dynamic behaviour of critical zones in railway tracks under moving train loads. Transp Geotechn2023; 41: 101009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101009
12.
ShahrakiMWarnakulasooriyaCWittKJ. Numerical study of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless railway track. Transp Geotechn2015; 3: 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.05.001
13.
WilkSTStarkTDRoseJG. Evaluating tie support at railway bridge transitions. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2015; 230(4): 1336–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715596192
14.
JainAMetrikineAVSteenbergenMJMM, et al.Dynamic amplifications in railway transition zones: performance evaluation of sleeper configurations using energy criterion. Frontiers in Built Environment2024; 10: 1285131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1285131
15.
TiutkinOAutelitanoFGiulianiF, et al.Stress-strain behavior of railway embankments stabilized with grouted micropiles. Alex Eng J2024; 102: 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.05.088
16.
GuptaRKChawlaS. Performance evaluation of micropiles as a ground improvement technique for existing railway tracks: finite-element and genetic programming approach. Int J GeoMech2021; 22(3): 04021287. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002270
17.
DongJWuZ-HLiX, et al.Dynamic response and pile-soil interaction of a heavy-haul railway embankment slope reinforced by micro-piles. Comput Geotech2018; 100: 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.04.005
BolerHMishraDHouW, et al.Understanding track substructure behavior: field instrumentation data analysis and development of numerical models. Transp Geotechn2018; 17: 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.10.001
20.
WilkST. Mitigation of differential movements at railroad bridge transition zones. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017. PhD Thesis.
21.
RDSO. GE: IRS-0004: Comprehensive Guidelines and Specifications for Railway Formation. Ministry of Railways, 2020.
22.
NgoTHasanM. Finite element modelling of geogrids reinforced ballasted tracks. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology2024; 11(4): 2425–2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00381-y
23.
ShahrakiMSadaghianiMWittK, et al.Model quality investigations of induced moving loads of high-speed trains. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, Delft, Netherlands,, June 2014, pp. 1169–1173.
24.
HallL. Simulations and analyses of train-induced ground vibrations in finite element models. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng2003; 23(5): 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00209-9
25.
SakhareAPunethaPMeenaNK, et al.Dynamic behaviour of integral abutment bridge transition under moving train loads. Transp Geotechn2023; 40: 100989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.100989
26.
ShahinMAIndraratnaB. Modeling the mechanical behavior of railway ballast using artificial neural networks. Can Geotech J2006; 43(11): 1144–1152. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-077
27.
MittalVSamantaMDashRK, et al.Subsurface explorations and investigation of foundation performance for distress assessment of a building. J Perform Constr Facil2023; 37(2): 04023011. https://doi.org/10.1061/jpcfev.cfeng-4187
28.
KhanMRDasakaSM. Quantification of ground-vibrations generated by high speed trains in ballasted railway tracks. Transp Geotechn2019; 20: 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100245
29.
AlamaaA. High-speed railway embankments: a comparison of different regulation. Masters Thesis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2016.
30.
SabatiniPJArmourTGroneckP, et al.Micropile design and construction (reference manual for NHI course 132078). Department of transportation. Federal Highway Administration, 2005.
31.
Heydari-NoghabiHVarandasJNEsmaeiliM, et al.Investigating the influence of auxiliary rails on dynamic behavior of railway transition zone by a 3D train-track interaction model. Lat Am J Solid Struct2017; 14(11): 2000–2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78253906
32.
CoelhoBZ. Dynamics of railway transition zones in soft soils. Delft University of Technology, 2011. PhD Thesis.
33.
PaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR. A numerical study on the influence of backfill settlements in the train/track interaction at transition zones to railway bridges. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2015; 230(3): 866–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715573289
34.
UIC 774 3R: Track/Bridge Interaction - Recommendations for Calculations. International Union of Railways, 2008.
35.
Ferré de FranceR. Technical reference LGV under PPP or DSP, volume 2 - earthworks. Saint Denis, 2010.
36.
Ril 836: Earthworks and Geotechnical Structures Design, Build and Maintenance. DB Netz AG, 1999.
37.
FeiJJieYHongC, et al.Comparative analysis of design parameters for high-speed railway earthworks in different countries and a unified definition of embankment substructure. Baltic J Road Bridge Eng2020; 15(2): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.476
38.
RDSO. BS-114: guidelines for carrying out Rail- structure interaction studies on Indian railways. Ministry of Railways, 2016.
