The rising demand for dual-operation vehicles capable of seamless transitions between urban tramways and heavy rail networks has intensified global interest in tram-train systems. These systems offer improved operational efficiency, reduced infrastructure costs, and enhanced passenger convenience. However, geometric disparities across rail types present a critical technical challenge. This study addresses the issue through an optimized wheel design compatible with six distinct rail configurations. A baseline wheel profile is proposed, incorporating a specialized geometry and unique rim structure to support smooth transitions at crossings and turnouts. A validated multi-physics simulation model is developed to assess dynamic performance across ten representative rail combinations. Derailment risk and wear number are defined as key quantities of interest (QoIs) and analyzed across three rail categories. Six geometric parameters, selected from a practical design perspective, are evaluated, with three screened out via the Morris sensitivity method. Based on algorithmic benchmarking, the Elliptical Basis Function (EBF) is selected to construct a surrogate model. The resulting meta-model captures multidimensional sensitivities and supports iterative optimization to yield optimal wheel profiles for each QoI. Beyond simulation—including dynamic response and cumulative wear prediction—full-scale experiments are performed on a newly constructed tram-train testbed featuring a dedicated transition lane. The optimized designs demonstrate superior dynamic stability, reduced wear, and decreased derailment risk, with good agreement between numerical and experimental results. This study contributes to the advancement of hybrid rail transit by integrating surrogate-based optimization with comprehensive computational and experimental validation, laying a foundation for safer, more efficient tram-train operations.
NovalesMOrroABugarinM. The tram-train: state of the art. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2002; 216(1): 1–13.
2.
DurzyńskiZPachołekMCichyR. Conditions for using of trams on railway tracks sections in agglomeration communication in Poland. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, Poznań, Poland, 27 July 2018, Vol. 180, p. 03002. EDP Sciences.
3.
NovalesMOrroABugarinMR. Tram-train: new public transport system. Transp Res Rec2002; 1793(1): 80–90.
4.
NovalesMOrroABugarínMR. Use of a genetic algorithm to optimize wheel profile geometry. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2007; 221(4): 467–476.
5.
HauserVKravchenkoKNozhenkoOet al.Double tread wheel profile–proposal and justification of specific way how to pass along small radius track. In: MATEC web of conferences, Univertisy of Zilina, 21 November 2018, Vol. 235, p. 00029. EDP Sciences.
6.
BrunerMRizzettoL. Dynamic simulation of tram–train vehicles on railway track. WIT Trans Built Environ2008; 101: 491–501.
7.
BoczPVinkóÁ. Proposal for the wheel profile of the new tram-train vehicle in Hungary. In: 4th International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure–CETRA, Šibenik, Croatia, 2016, pp. 23–25.
8.
JeongNTWangMYooS, et al.Conceptual design of high-speed semi-low-floor bogie for train-tram. Int J Automot Technol2017; 18: 523–533.
9.
CrosbeeDAllenPCarrollR. Analysis of design and performance of tram-train profiles for dual-operation running. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2017; 231(5): 578–597.
10.
AllenPBevanA. Determination of tramway wheel and rail profiles to minimise derailment. Office of Rail Regulation OOR, 2008.
11.
TunnaJSinclairJPerezJ. A review of wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2007; 221(2): 271–289.
12.
TaoGWenZZhaoX, et al.Effects of wheel–rail contact modelling on wheel wear simulation. Wear2016; 366–367: 146–156.
13.
PerssonINilssonRBikU, et al.Use of a genetic algorithm to improve the rail profile on Stockholm underground. Veh Syst Dyn2010; 48(S1): 89–104.
14.
YaodongFDabinCPengchengLet al. Wheel profile optimization of speed-up freight train based on multi-population genetic algorithm. Mechanical Engineering Science. 2021; 3(1): 28–38.
15.
LewisRDwyer-JoyceROlofssonU, et al.Mapping railway wheel material wear mechanisms and transitions. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2010; 224(3): 125–137.
16.
GqTDuXZhangH, et al.Development and validation of a model for predicting wheel wear in high-speed trains. J Zhejiang Univ - Sci2017; 18(8): 603–616.
17.
ChoiHYLeeDHLeeJ. Optimization of a railway wheel profile to minimize flange wear and surface fatigue. Wear2013; 300(1–2): 225–233.
18.
RenDTaoGWenZ, et al.Wheel profile optimisation for mitigating flange wear on metro wheels and verification through wear prediction. Veh Syst Dyn2021; 59(12): 1894–1915.
19.
GaoETaoGRenD, et al.Multi-objective optimisation of a metro wheel profile to reduce wheel flange wear and rcf considering the distribution density of wheel- rail contact points. Veh Syst Dyn2025; 63(2): 351–374.
20.
JeonCSChoHSParkCS, et al.Critical speed enhancement of a Korean high-speed train through optimization with measured wheel profiles. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2018; 232(1): 171–181.
21.
BevanAMolyneux-BerryPEickhoffB, et al.Development and validation of a wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue damage model. Wear2013; 307(1–2): 100–111.
22.
de Paula PachecoPAEndlichCSVieiraKLS, et al.Optimization of heavy haul railway wheel profile based on rolling contact fatigue and wear performance. Wear2023; 522: 204704.
23.
ShevtsovIMarkineVEsveldC. Design of railway wheel profile taking into account rolling contact fatigue and wear. Wear2008; 265(9–10): 1273–1282.
24.
SantamariaJHerrerosJVadilloE, et al.Design of an optimised wheel profile for rail vehicles operating on two-track gauges. Veh Syst Dyn2013; 51(1): 54–73.
25.
PolachO. Wheel profile design for the targeted conicity and a wide contact spreading. In: BRACCIALI A. The 8th international conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems, Firenze, 15–18 September 2009, pp. 809–816. University of Twente.
26.
LuYYangYWangJ, et al.Optimization and design of a railway wheel profile based on interval uncertainty to reduce circular wear. Math Probl Eng2020; 2020(1): 1–10.
27.
LuoRLiuBQuS. A fast simulation algorithm for the wheel profile wear of high-speed trains considering stochastic parameters. Wear2021; 480-481: 203942.
28.
YeYVuittonJSunY, et al.Railway wheel profile fine-tuning system for profile recommendation. Railw Eng Sci2021; 29: 74–93.
29.
LuoRShiHTengW, et al.Prediction of wheel profile wear and vehicle dynamics evolution considering stochastic parameters for high-speed train. Wear2017; 392–393: 126–138.
30.
IgnestiMInnocentiAMariniL, et al.Development of a wear model for the wheel profile optimisation on railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2013; 51(9): 1363–1402.
WangCDaiHWangJ, et al.Experimental and simulation study on the effect of different wheel profiles on the dynamics and wheel wear of high-speed trains. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2023; 237(8): 1025–1036.
33.
CuiDWangHLiL, et al.Optimal design of wheel profiles for high-speed trains. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2015; 229(3): 248–261.
34.
FeldmeierCLiHYamazakiY, et al.Prediction of the wheel profile wear using railroad vehicle dynamics simulation: Comparison of simulation and test results. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part K J Multi-body Dyn2018; 232(2): 224–236.
35.
BraghinFLewisRDwyer-JoyceR, et al.A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear2006; 261(11–12): 1253–1264.
36.
CuiDWangRAllenP, et al.Multi-objective optimization of electric multiple unit wheel profile from wheel flange wear viewpoint. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2019; 59: 279–289.
37.
SongCYChoiHY. Multi-objective profile design optimization to minimize wear damage and surface fatigue of city train wheel. Applied Sciences2022; 12(8): 3940.
38.
LeeSSenORaiNK, et al.Effects of parametric uncertainty on multi-scale model predictions of shock response of a pressed energetic material. J Appl Phys2019; 125(23): 235104.
39.
UdaykumarHSenOLeeS, et al.Unified approach for meso-informed burn models in shocked energetic materials. J Propul Power2020; 36(5): 655–667.
40.
KarisTBergMStichelS. Analysing the correlation between vehicle responses and track irregularities using dynamic simulations and measurements. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2020; 234(2): 170–182.
41.
HurHMParkJHYouWH, et al.A study on the critical speed of worn wheel profile using a scale model. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23: 2790–2800.
42.
EsveldCEsveldC. Modern railway track. MRT-productions Zaltbommel, 2001, Vol. 385.
43.
ForresterASobesterAKeaneA. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
44.
SenODavisSJacobsG, et al.Evaluation of convergence behavior of metamodeling techniques for bridging scales in multi-scale multimaterial simulation. J Comput Phys2015; 294: 585–604.
45.
KansaEJ. Multiquadrics—a scattered data approximation scheme with applications to computational fluid-dynamics—Ii solutions to parabolic, hyperbolic and elliptic partial differential equations. Computers & mathematics with applications1990; 19(8–9): 147–161.
46.
JohnstonLPKramerMA. Probability density estimation using elliptical basis functions. AIChE J1994; 40(10): 1639–1649.
47.
MakMWKungSY. Estimation of elliptical basis function parameters by the em algorithm with application to speaker verification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2000; 11(4): 961–969.
48.
LiuBBruniSLewisR. Numerical calculation of wear in rolling contact based on the Archard equation: effect of contact parameters and consideration of uncertainties. Wear2022; 490–491: 204188.
49.
WangJSuYAlagu SubramaniamN, et al.Archard model guided feature engineering improved support vector regression for rail wear analysis. Eng Fail Anal2022; 137: 106248.
50.
LiXJinXWenZ, et al.A new integrated model to predict wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear2011; 271(1–2): 227–237.
51.
OdenJT. Finite elements of nonlinear continua. Courier Corporation, 2006.
52.
HondoTKuniyukiSTanakaT, et al.Method for measuring lateral force utilizing shear strains inside wheel load measuring holes of instrumented wheelset. Q rep RTRI2022; 63(2): 139–144.
53.
BraccialiAFolgaraitP. New sensor for lateral & vertical wheel-rail forces measurements. In: Conference on railway engineering, London, 2004, pp. 6–7.
