Virtual Coupling is an emerging technology that can significantly improve railway network capacity. Various advanced controllers have been proposed to achieve virtual coupling. PID-based controllers are still one of the most popular controllers for metro train Automatic Train Operation in the real world environment. It is therefore understandable that some train operators might prefer to leverage existing PID-based control systems to achieve virtual coupling. This paper focused on the parameter tuning problem of a PID-based controller by using Particle Swarm Optimisation. Such studies for virtual coupling have not been noticed in open literature. A real-world metro train and a real-world section of track were modelled. A three-train platoon using the predecessor-following topology was simulated. Nine optimisations with three different swarm sizes were carried out. The results show that, with a swarm size of 50 and maximum iteration of 1000, the optimisation was able to produce converged and consistent results. Virtual coupling simulations were carried out and analysed. The results demonstrated that the optimised PID gains are capable of achieving good precision of train spacing control, with most errors falling within the ±0.25 m range, and maximum deviations peaking around 2.6 m.
GoikoetxeaJ.Roadmap towards the wireless virtual coupling of trains. In: International Workshop on Communication Technologies for Vehicles, San Sebastian, Spain, 6-7 Jun 2016.
2.
FlamminiFMarroneSNardoneR, et al.Towards railway virtual coupling. In: IEEE International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles & International Transportation Electrification Conference (ESARS-ITEC), Nottingham UK, 7-9 Nov 2018.
StickelSSchenkerMDittusH, et al.Technical feasibility analysis and introduction strategy of the virtually coupled train set concept, Scientific Reports, vol. 12, art. no. 4248, 2022.
5.
ZhangQWangHZhangY, et al.A holistic solution to virtual coupling based urban rail train control system. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2023; 238: 603–615. DOI: 10.1177/09544097231215519.
6.
KetphatNWhiteingALiuR. State movement for controlling trains operating under the virtual coupling system. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2022; 236(2): 172–182. DOI: 10.1177/09544097211043747.
7.
XunJLiYLiuR, et al.A survey on control methods for virtual coupling in railway operation. IEEE Open J Intell Transp Syst2022; 3: 838–855.
8.
WuQGeXHanQ-L, et al.Railway virtual coupling: a survey of emerging control techniques. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2023; 8(5): 3239–3255.
9.
FelezJVaquero-SerranoMA. Virtual coupling in railways: a comprehensive review. Machines2023; 11(5): 521.
10.
ZhangZSongHWangH, et al.Cooperative multi-scenario departure control for virtual coupling trains: a fixed-time approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2021; 70(9): 8545–8555.
11.
WuQGeXHanQ-L, et al.Dynamics and control simulation of railway virtual coupling. Veh Syst Dyn2023; 61(9): 2292–2316.
12.
GeXWuQHanQ-L, et al.Resilient virtual coupling control of automatic train convoys with intermittent communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2023; 73: 6183–6195. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2023.3339854.
13.
CaoYWenJMaL. Tracking and collision avoidance of virtual coupling train control system. Future Gener Comput Syst2021; 120: 76–90.
14.
LiuYZhouYSuS, et al.Control strategy for stable formation of high-speed virtually coupled trains with disturbances and delays. Computer aided Civil Eng2023; 38: 621–639.
15.
SuSSheJLiK, et al.A nonlinear safety equilibrium spacing-based model predictive control for virtually coupled train set over gradient terrains. IEEE Trans Transp Electrific2022; 8(2): 2810–2824.
16.
LiuYOuDYangY, et al.A method for maintaining virtually coupled states of train convoys. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit2023; 237(2): 243–252.
17.
ParkJLeeBEunY. Virtual coupling of railway vehicles: gap reference for merge and separation, robust control, and position measurement. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst2022; 23(2): 1085–1096.
18.
WangDCaoY. Adaptive cruise control of virtual coupled trains based on sliding mode. J Phys: Conf Ser2022; 2224(1): 012109.
19.
WangHZhaoQLinS, et al.A reinforcement learning empowered cooperative control approach for IIoT-based virtually coupled train sets. IEEE Trans Ind Inf2021; 17(7): 4935–4945.
20.
SuSLiuWZhuQ, et al.A cooperative collision-avoidance control methodology for virtual coupling trains. Accid Anal Prev2022; 173: 106703.
21.
WangBYangDZhangX, et al.Constraint-force driven control design for rail vehicle virtual coupling. J Vib Control2022; 28(5-6): 551–563.
22.
ZhangXYangDZhangW, et al.Optimal robust constraints-following control for rail vehicle virtual coupling. J Vib Control2023; 29(5-6): 1352–1365.
23.
QiuSLiNWeiX, et al.Research on the stability of virtual coupling train formation based on a PID controller under the influence of time delay. Transportation Safety and Environment2023; 6: tdad037. DOI: 10.1093/tse/tdad037.
24.
ChenBZhangLChengG, et al.A novel approach for train tracking in virtual coupling based on soft actor-critic. Actuators2023; 12(12): 447. DOI: 10.3390/act12120447.
25.
RawlingsCDixonRDuttaS. Exploring the virtual coupling of railway vehicles. In: 13th World Congress on Rail Research At: Birmingham, UK.
26.
Di MeoCDi VaioMFlamminiF, et al.ERTMS/ETCS virtual coupling: proof of concept and numerical analysis. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst2020; 21(6): 2545–2556.
27.
LiuK-WWangX-CQuZ-H. Research on multi-objective optimization and control algorithms for automatic train operation. Energies2019; 12(20): 3842. DOI: 10.3390/en12203842.
28.
CaoFWangJFZhaoS. A new estimation method of the PID controller in automatic train operation systems. J Phys: Conf Ser2021; 1972(1): 012037.
29.
WangZOuD. Parameter adaptive research of automatic train control algorithm based on sliding mode PID. Transp Res Rec2024; 2678(3): 728–741. DOI: 10.1177/03611981231182707.
30.
AllottaBChisciLD’AdamioP, et al.Design of an Automatic Train Operation (ATO) system based on CBTC for the management of driverless suburban railways. In: 12th IMEKO TC 10 Workshop on Technical Diagnostics, Florence Italy, June 6-7 2013.
31.
ShenHYanJ. Optimal control of rail transportation associated automatic train operation based on fuzzy control algorithm and PID algorithm. Automat Control Comput Sci2017; 51: 435–441. DOI: 10.3103/S0146411617060086.
32.
WangFBaoLCaiH, et al.Optimization of algorithm for ATO speed controller of PID control. In: 2022 IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE). Beijing, China, 11-13 November 2022, pp. 83–86. DOI: 10.1109/ICITE56321.2022.10101382.
33.
WuQColeCMcSweeneyT. Applications of particle swarm optimization in the railway domain. Int J Real Ther2016; 4(3): 167–190. DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2016.1179599.
34.
DomínguezMFernández-CardadorACucalaAP, et al.Multi objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for the design of efficient ATO speed profiles in metro lines. Eng Appl Artif Intell2014; 29: 43–53.
35.
KennedyJEberhartR. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia, November 27 - December 1, 1995, pp. 1942–1948, Vol. 4.
