High-speed locomotives are prone to the carbody or bogie hunting under extreme wheel-rail contact conditions, which can cause negative impacts on vehicle dynamics performance. The influence of key suspension parameters on the carbody lateral ride comfort and bogie lateral acceleration is investigated by the multi-objective optimization and Sobol global sensitivity analysis methods, which is based on the Radial Basis Function Neutral Network surrogate model. The results illustrate that the yaw damper damping is sensitive to the two hunting stabilities, but conventional yaw dampers with fixed damping fail to satisfy both the stability demands simultaneously. Therefore, this paper presents a damping-adjustable yaw damper integrating an FSD (frequency-selective damping) valve to guarantee the lateral stability especially in abnormal wheel-rail contact states, and the application effects of the FSD yaw damper for the locomotive are researched by dynamics simulations. The results show that the FSD yaw damper can improve the adaptability of the locomotive to both the low and high wheel-rail contact conicity service conditions compared with the conventional yaw dampers.
SunJFChiMRJinXS, et al.Experimental and numerical study on carbody hunting of electric locomotive induced by low wheel-rail contact conicity. Veh Syst Dyn2021; 59: 203–223.
9.
FujimotoHMiyamotoM. Lateral vibration and its decreasing measure of a Shinkansen train. Veh Syst Dyn1996; 25: 188–199.
10.
WeiLZengJChiMR, et al.Carbody elastic vibrations of high-speed vehicles caused by bogie hunting instability. Veh Syst Dyn2017; 55: 1321–1342.
11.
PerssonRAnderssonEStichelS, et al.Bogies towards higher speed on existing tracks. Int J Rail Transp2014; 2: 40–49.
12.
ZhangHRanXRWangXG, et al.Coupling effects of yaw damper and wheel-rail contact on ride quality of railway vehicle. Shock Vib2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6692451.
13.
WangWLHuangYYangXJ, et al.Non-linear parametric modelling of a high-speed rail hydraulic yaw damper with series clearance and stiffness. Nonlinear Dyn2011; 65: 13–34.
14.
WangWLYuDSHuangY, et al.A locomotive’s dynamic response to in-service parameter variations of its hydraulic yaw damper. Nonlinear Dyn2014; 77: 1485–1502.
15.
YanYZengJHuangCH, et al.Bifurcation analysis of railway bogie with yaw damper. Arch Appl Mech2019; 89: 1185–1199.
XiaZHZhouJSGongD, et al.Theoretical study on the effect of the anti-yaw damper for rail vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng C-J Mec2019; 234: 457–473.
18.
YangDXChiMRCaiWB, et al.Study on piecewise linear model of anti-yaw damper and test analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Industrial Informatics and Computer Engineering Conference. Xi’an, China, 2015.
19.
AlonsoAGiménezJGGomezE. Yaw damper modelling and its influence on railway dynamic stability. Veh Syst Dyn2011; 49: 1367–1387.
20.
WangDHLiaoWH. Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers. Part II: simulation and analysis. Veh Syst Dyn2009; 47: 1439–1471.
21.
ShinYJYouWHHurHM, et al.Semi-active control to reduce carbody vibration of railway vehicle by using scaled roller rig. J Mech Sci Technol2012; 26: 3423–3431.
22.
ZongLHGongXLXuanSH, et al.Semi-active H∞ control of high-speed railway vehicle suspension with magnetorheological dampers. Veh Syst Dyn2013; 51: 600–626.
23.
KimHCShinYJYouW, et al.A ride quality evaluation of a semi-active railway vehicle suspension system with MR damper: railway field tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2017; 231: 306–316.
24.
YaoYChenXWLiH, et al.Suspension parameters design for robust and adaptive lateral stability of high-speed train. Veh Syst Dyn2022. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2022.2062012.
25.
HuoWBYueBSLiuXG, et al.The development of stiffness-adjustable anti-yaw damper. In: Proceeding of the the IAVSD International Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2019.
26.
YangGZ. Hydraulic damper for rolling stocks. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2003.
27.
DecockP. Fluid-filled frequency dependent damper. Patent 201280054137-ZH, China, 2014.
28.
YaoYLiGWuGS, et al.Suspension parameters optimum of high-speed train bogie for hunting stability robustness. Int J Rail Transp2019; 8: 195–214.
29.
ChenXWYaoYShenLJ, et al.Multi-objective optimization of high-speed train suspension parameters for improving hunting stability. Int J Rail Transp2022; 10: 159–176.
30.
KalkerJJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn1982; 11: 1–13.
31.
IwnickiS. Simulation of wheel–rail contact forces. Fatigue Fract Eng M2003; 26: 887–900.
32.
TrueHAsmundR. The dynamics of a railway freight wagon wheelset with dry friction damping. Veh Sys Dyn2003; 38: 149–163.
33.
BruniSVinolasJBergM, et al.Modelling of suspension components in a rail vehicle dynamics context. Veh Sys Dyn2011; 49: 1021–1072.
ZhaiWMHanZLChenZW, et al.Train-track-bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Veh Syst Dyn2019; 57: 984–1027.
36.
ChengFWeiKZhaoZM, et al.Track dynamic geometry state prediction for straight/curved low-stiffness urban rail transit viaduct lines based on virtual track inspection method. Veh Syst Dyn2021. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2021.2007956.
37.
LiGWuRDDengXX, et al.Suspension parameters matching of high-speed locomotive based on stability/comfort Pareto optimization. Veh Syst Dyn2021. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2021.1979602.
38.
PolachO. On non-linear methods of bogie stability assessment using computer simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2006; 220: 13–27.
SuzukiH. Research trends on riding comfort evaluation in Japan. Proc Inst Meche Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit1998; 212: 61–72.
41.
KimYGKwonHBKimSW, et al.Correlation of ride comfort evaluation methods for railway vehicles. Proc Inst Meche Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2003; 217: 73–88.
42.
National Railway Administration, GB/T5599. Specification for dynamic performance assessment and testing verification of rolling stock. China, Beijing: National Railway Administration, 2019. (in Chinese).
43.
ZhaiWMLiuPFLinJH, et al.Experimental investigation on vibration behaviour of a CRH train at speed of 350 km/h. Int J Rail Transp2015; 3: 1–16.
44.
IoossBLemaîtreP. A review on global sensitivity analysis methods, uncertainty management in simulation-optimization of complex systems. US: Springer, 2015.
45.
NossentJElsenPBauwensW. Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environ Modell Softw2011; 26: 1515–1525.
46.
KassaENielsenJCO. Stochastic analysis of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout. Veh Syst Dyn2008; 46: 429–449.
47.
KhairyEChrisL. Robust parameter design optimization using kriging, RBF and RBFNN with gradient-based and evolutionary optimization techniques. Appl Math Comput2014; 236: 325–344.
48.
YouTWGongDZhouJS, et al.Frequency response function-based model updating of flexible vehicle body using experiment modal parameter. Veh Syst Dyn2021. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2021.1983182.
