Transition zones between railway tracks and bridge decks can cause higher dynamic impacts. A solution is smoothly changing the track stiffness by gradually mixing steel furnace slag into the stone ballast. A nominated bridge transition zone is divided into 5 blocks of 7 meters long, with the mixing percentages of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. The mechanical behaviors of furnace slag-ballast combinations (FS-BCs) were studied using experiments of shear strength test, Los Angles abrasion index and plate load test. Furthermore, the dynamic behavior of bridge transition zone with FS-BCs blocks was investigated using a field validated FEM model. Results show that the 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% furnace slag by weight of ballast can increase the shear strength and ballast layer bending modulus by 13%, 12%, 9% and 7% at speed of 300 km/h compared with those of the stone ballast. The FEM study shows that rail deflections are reduced about 20%, 14%, 21% and 16% at speed of 300 km/h corresponding to 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% FS-BCs and accelerations are significantly reduced as well as increasing FS content of each block in bridge transition zone so that a smooth bridge transition zone can be achieved.
WangHMarkineV.Corrective countermeasure for track transition zones in railways: adjustable fastener. Eng Struct2018; 169: 1–14.
2.
VajdićMOslakovićISKraljS. Transition zones on the railway track-overview. In: 2nd international conference on road and rail infrastructure, CETRA 2012 2012, pp.633–640. Croatia: University of Zagreb.
3.
ShahrakiMWittKJ.3D modeling of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless high-speed railway track. J Traffic Transp Eng2015; 3: 234–240.
4.
WangHSilvastMMarkineV, et al. Analysis of the dynamic wheel loads in railway transition zones considering the moisture condition of the ballast and subballast. Appl Sci2017; 7: 1208.
5.
WangHMarkineV.Modelling of the long-term behaviour of transition zones: prediction of track settlement. Eng Struct2018; 156: 294–304.
6.
WangHMarkineVL.Methodology for the comprehensive analysis of railway transition zones. Comput Geotech2018; 99: 64–79.
7.
WangHMarkineV.Dynamic behaviour of the track in transitions zones considering the differential settlement. J Sound Vib2019; 459: 114863.
8.
CoelhoBHölscherPPriestJ, et al. An assessment of transition zone performance. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011; 225: 129–139.
9.
EsveldC. Developments in high-speed track design. In: IABSE symposium report,2003, pp.37–45. Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
HuPZhangCWenS, et al. Dynamic responses of high-speed railway transition zone with various subgrade fillings. Comput Geotech2019; 108: 17–26.
12.
PaixãoAVarandasJNFortunatoE, et al. Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges. Eng Struct2018; 164: 169–182.
13.
PaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR.Transition zones to railway bridges: track measurements and numerical modelling. Eng Struct2014; 80: 435–443.
14.
ShahrakiMWarnakulasooriyaCWittKJ.Numerical study of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless railway track. Transportation Geotechnics2015; 3: 58–67.
15.
MottahedJZakeriJAMohammadzadehS.A field investigation on the effects of using USPs in transition zone from ballasted track to bridges. Int J Civ Eng2019; 17: 1421–1431.
16.
ZakeriJ-AGhorbaniV.Investigation on dynamic behavior of railway track in transition zone. J Mech Sci Technol2011; 25: 287–292.
17.
FontserèVPitaALManzoN, et al. NEOBALLAST: new high-performance and long-lasting ballast for sustainable railway infrastructures. Transp Res Procedia2016; 14: 1847–1854.
18.
JiaWMarkineVGuoY, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations on the shear behaviour of recycled railway ballast. Constr Build Mater2019; 217: 310–320.
19.
DelgadoBGda FonsecaAVFortunatoE, et al. Mechanical behavior of inert steel slag ballast for heavy haul rail track: laboratory evaluation. Transp Geotechn2019; 20: 100243.
20.
EsmaeiliMAelaPHosseiniA.Experimental assessment of cyclic behavior of sand-fouled ballast mixed with tire derived aggregates. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng2017; 98: 1–11.
21.
Sol-SánchezMMoreno-NavarroFRubio-GámezM, et al. Full-scale study of neoballast section for its application in railway tracks: optimization of track design. Mater Struct2018; 51: 43.
22.
EsmaeiliMZakeriJAEbrahimiH, et al. Experimental study on dynamic properties of railway ballast mixed with tire derived aggregate by modal shaker test. Adv Mech Eng2016; 8: 168781401664024–1687814016640245.
23.
FerreiraSR.Comportamento mecânico e ambiental de materiais granulares: aplicação às escórias de aciaria nacionais. 2010.
24.
EsmaeiliMNouriRYousefianK.Experimental comparison of the lateral resistance of tracks with steel slag ballast and limestone ballast materials. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 231: 175–184.
25.
EsmaeiliMYousefianKAsgharzadeh GhahroudiP.An investigation of abrasion and wear characteristics of steel slag and granite ballasts. Proc Inst Civil Eng Constr Mater2017; 173: 1–12.
26.
EsmaeiliMYousefianKNouriR.Vertical load distribution in ballasted railway tracks with steel slag and limestone ballasts. Int J Pavement Eng2019; 20: 1065–1072.
27.
AREMA. Manual for railway engineering. Lanham, MD: AREMA, 2013.
28.
WangGC.The utilization of slag in civil infrastructure construction. UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2016.
29.
GuoJBaoYWangM.Steel slag in China: treatment, recycling, and management. Waste Manag2018; 78: 318–330.
30.
AstmC. Standard test method for resistance to abrasion of small size coarse aggregate by use of the Los Angeles machine. In: Annual book of ASTM standards 1996, pp.131–196. USA: ASTM Committee.
31.
The Ministry of Railways of the People's Republic of China. Code For design of high-speed railway in China (TB 10621-2014). Railway Industry Standard of the People's Republic of China, China, 2014.
32.
IndraratnaBNgoNTRujikiatkamjornC, et al. Behavior of fresh and fouled railway ballast subjected to direct shear testing: discrete element simulation. Int J Geomech2014; 14: 34–44.
33.
DaneshAPalassiMMirghasemiAA.Effect of sand and clay fouling on the shear strength of railway ballast for different ballast gradations. Granular Matter2018; 20: 51.
34.
WangZJingGYuQ, et al. Analysis of ballast direct shear tests by discrete element method under different normal stress. Measurement2015; 63: 17–24.
35.
SwetaKHussainiSKK.Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions. Geotext Geomembr2018; 46: 251–256.
36.
GongHSongWHuangB, et al. Direct shear properties of railway ballast mixed with tire derived aggregates: experimental and numerical investigations. Constr Build Mater2019; 200: 465–473.
37.
StarkTDSwanRHYuanZ. Ballast direct shear testing. In: 2014 joint rail conference 2014, pp.V001T001A003. USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
38.
DissanayakeDKurukulasuriyaLDissanayakeP.Evaluation of shear strength parameters of rail track ballast in Sri Lanka. J Natn Sci Foundation Sri Lanka2016; 44: 61.
39.
JingGQieLMarkineV, et al. Polyurethane reinforced ballasted track: review, innovation and challenge. Constr Build Mater2019; 208: 734–748.
40.
DroździelJSowińskiB.Method of track vertical stiffness estimation based on experiment. Arch Transp2010; 22: 153–162.
41.
ZakeriJAMosayebiSA.Study of ballast layer stiffness in railway tracks. Gradevinar2016; 68: 311–318.
42.
SeligETPanuccioCYooT.Mechanics of ballast compaction: summary report. Volume 5. USA: Federal Railroad Administration, 1982.
43.
ASTM C. C 29-97. Standard test method for bulk density (unit weight) and voids in aggregate. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1997.
44.
StandardB.Method for determination of particle shape; flakiness index. British Standard 812-105.1. London, UK: British Standard Institution, 2000.
45.
TimoshenkoSPGoodierJN.Theory of elasticity. New York: McGraw Hill, 1970.
46.
BoussinesqJ.Discussed in theory of elasticity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
47.
SeligETYooTPanuccioC.Mechanics of ballast compaction: field methods for ballast physical state measurement. Volume 2. USA: Federal Railroad Administration, 1982.
48.
MeissonnierF. EUROBALT II final technical report–7S. 2000.
49.
EsmaeiliMSiahkouhiM.Tire‐derived aggregate layer performance in railway bridges as a novel impact absorber: numerical and field study. Struct Control Health Monit2019; 26: e2444.
50.
DoyleNF. Railway track design: a review of current practice. Australian Government Publishing Service, ISBN 0642050147, 1980.
51.
EsmaeiliMKhodaverdianANeyestanakiHK, et al. Investigating the effect of nailed sleepers on increasing the lateral resistance of ballasted track. Comput Geotech2016; 71: 1–11.
52.
AS 1141.11.1. Methods for sampling and testing aggregates Particle size distribution – Sieving method. Standards Australia, 2009.
53.
Abaqus. ABAQUSuser’s manual. Version 6.14. Providence, RI: Abaqus, 2014.
54.
SearaICorreiaAG.Performance assesment solutions for transition zones embankment-bridge railways trough numerical simulation 3D. Semana de Engenharia2010; 2010: 11–15.
55.
ShiJBurrowMPChanAH, et al. Measurements and simulation of the dynamic responses of a bridge – embankment transition zone below a heavy haul railway line. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2013; 227: 254–268.
