Quantification of rail transit wheel loads and development of improved dynamic and impact loading factors for design

Abstract

An increase in the number of rail transit track construction and rehabilitation projects in North America has generated increased interest in optimizing the design of the track infrastructure and its components. Many rail transit track component design guidelines use historical wheel loads and loading factors that were derived from freight railroad design practices. These design factors may not be representative of the loading experienced on the rail transit networks today, leading to over-designed, sub-optimal infrastructure components. Therefore, researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign are conducting research to lay the groundwork for improved understanding of the loading environment entering the track structure using wheel loads data obtained from recently deployed field instrumentation and existing wheel impact load detectors. This paper evaluates the existing design impact factors and assesses their effectiveness when applied to the rail transit sector, using data from three representative rail transit agencies in the United States. New dynamic loading factors are also proposed to represent the rail transit loading environment more accurately. A quantitative approach to addressing design factors may provide economies in future designs and facilitate the use of probability of exceedance and other metrics that relate to factors of safety.

Keywords

Rail transit wheel–rail interface dynamic wheel load factor impact factor concrete sleeper track components mechanistic design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kerr

. Fundamentals of railway track engineering, Simmons Boardman Pub Co, 2003.

AREMA. AREMA Chapter 30 (Ties). Manual on Railway Engineering, Landover, MD, 2016.

Hay

. Railroad engineering, 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1953.

Van Dyk

. Characterization of the loading environment for shared-use railway superstructure in North America, Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2014.

Van Dyk

Scheppe

Edwards

et al.

Methods for quantifying rail seat loads and a review of previous experimentation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2016; 230: 935–945.

Stratman

Liu

Mahadevan

. Structural health monitoring of railroad wheels using wheel impact load detectors. J Fail Anal Prev 2007; 7: 218–225.

Harrison HD, Cheng LR and GeMeiner W. Tracking the performance of heavy axle load vehicles in revenue service. In: Proceedings Of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress And Exposition, Chicago, Illinois: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Rail Transportation Division (RTD), 2006.

Lin

Edwards

Dersch

et al.

Load quantification of the wheel–rail interface of rail vehicles for the infrastructure of light rail, heavy rail, and commuter rail transit. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2017; 232: 596–605.

Doyle

. Railway track design: a review of current practice, Melbourne: BHP, 1980.

10.

Sadeghi

Barati

. Comparisons of the mechanical properties of timber, steel and concrete sleepers. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2010; 8: 1151–1159.

11.

Van Dyk

Dersch

Edwards

et al.

Load characterization techniques and overview of loading environment in North America. Transport Res Rec 2014; 2448: 80–86.

12.

Leong J and Murray MH. Probabilistic analysis of train–track vertical impact forces. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-transport, Thomas Telford Ltd, 2008, pp.15–21.

13.

Australian Standard. 2003. Railway track material Part 14: prestressed concrete sleepers.

14.

Knothe

Stichel

. Rail vehicle dynamics, Springer, 2013.

15.

Van Dyk

Edwards

Dersch

Ruppert

Barkan

. Evaluation of dynamic and impact wheel load factors and their application in design processes. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2017; 231: 33–43.

16.

Sadeghi J. New advances in analysis and design of railway track system. In: Perpinya X (ed.) Reliability and safety in railway. InTech, 2012, pp.75–100.

17.

AREMA. AREMA Chapter 30 (Ties). Manual on Railway Engineering, Landover, MD, 2017.

18.

Edwards

Zhengboyang

Wolf

et al.

Quantification of concrete railway sleeper bending moments using surface strain gauges. Measurement 2017; 111: 197–207.

19.

Van Dyk BJ, Edwards JR, Ruppert CJ Jr, et al. Considerations for mechanistic design of concrete sleepers and elastic fastening systems in North America. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international heavy haul association conference, 2013, p. 4.

20.

Canadian National. Wheel impact load detectors: the early history on CN. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual North American rail mechanical operations seminar, St. Louis, MO, USA, March 2011.

21.

Elsaleiby

AAS

. Wheel imbalance effect on the output of wheel impact load detector system (WILD), Pueblo: Colorado State University, 2014.

22.

Wiley

Elsaleiby

. A review of wheel impact measurement variation, Pueblo: Transportation Technology Center, Inc., 2007.

23.

FTA. Revenue Vehicle Inventory, National Transit Database (NTD), 2013.

24.

Press

Teukolsky

Vetterling

et al.

Numerical recipes in C++: the art of scientific computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

25.

Darling

. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramer–von Mises tests. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1957; 28: 823–838.