An investigation of the dynamic behaviour of track transition zones using discrete element modelling

Abstract

Previous investigations have shown that an abrupt stiffness change in track support is often associated with accelerated rates of deterioration of track geometry, high maintenance demand and poor ride quality. However, at present, there is no detailed understanding of the mechanisms of the deterioration of track geometry at transition zones. This paper aims to use the discrete element method to investigate transition zones from a micromechanical perspective. A simple track transition model with dimensions 2.1 m × 0.3 m × 0.45 m was simulated by using PFC^3D. In order to identify and evaluate appropriate mitigation methods, two kinds of transition patterns, including a single step change and a multi step-by-step change for subgrade stiffness distribution were tested. The influence of train direction, speed and axle load on the transition was also investigated. In addition, geogrid was used in the ballast layer to examine the effects of geogrid reinforcement. This paper provides insight into the factors that can cause or accelerate track degradation at the transition zones, in order to identify and evaluate appropriate mitigation design.

Keywords

Transition zones subgrade stiffness phase loading differential settlement geogrid reinforcement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davis D and Li D. Design of track transitions. Research Results Digest 79, 2006. Pueblo, CO: Transportation Technology Centre, Inc.

Kerr

Moroney

. Track transition problems and remedies, Landover, MD: American Railway Engineering Association, 1993, pp. 267–298.

Fröhling RD, Scheffel H and Ebersöhn W. The vertical dynamic response of a rail vehicle caused by track stiffness variations along the track. Vehicle System Dynamics 1996; 25(Supplement): 175–187.

Hunt

Winkler

. Settlement of railway track near bridge abutments. Proc Inst Civil Engs, Transport 1997; 123(1): 68–73. .

Briaud J, James RW and Hoffman SB. Settlement of bridge approaches (the bump at the end of the bridge). NCHRP Synthesis 234, 1997. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.

Hoppe

. The use, design, and control of bridge approach slabs. Routes Roads 2001; 312: 24–33.

Davis

. Transition of railroad bridge approaches. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng 2005; 131(11): 1392–1398. .

Deformations and remedies for soft railroad subgrade subjected to heavy axle loads. In: Zornberg

Christopher

(eds). Advances in transportation and geoenvironmental systems using geosynthetics, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2000, pp. 307–321.

Rose

Walker

. Heavy haul asphalt underlayment trackbeds: pressure, deflection, materials, properties measurements. Proceedings in railway engineering (CD-ROM), Edinburgh, UK: ECS Publications, 2002, pp. 18–18.

10.

Bilow DN and Li D. Concrete slab track test on the high tonnage loop at the Transportation Technology Center. In: The AREMA annual conference Exposition. Chicago, Illinois, September 2005.

11.

Selig

Waters

. Track geotechnology and substructure management, London, UK: Thomas Telford, 1994.

12.

Banimahd

Woodward

. Numerical study of train speed effect on railway track response. In: The ninth international conference on railway engineering, London, UK, 2007.

13.

Lei

Zhang

. Influence of track stiffness distribution on vehicle and track interactions in track transition. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2010; 224: 592–604.

14.

Banimahd

Woodward

Kenndy

Medero

. Behaviour of train-track interaction in stiffness transitions. Proc Inst Civil Engs, Transport 2011; 164(1): 1–10. .

15.

Varandas

Holscher

Silva

MAG

. Dynamic behaviour of railway tracks on transition zones. Comput Struct 2011; 89: 1468–1479.

16.

Cundall

Strack

ODL

. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 1979; 29(1): 47–65. .

17.

RT/CE/S/006 Issue 3: 2000. RailTrack line specification: track ballast.

18.

Lim

McDowell

. Discrete element modelling of railway ballast. Gran Mat 2005; 7(1): 19–29. .

19.

Powrie

Harkness

Zhang

. Numerical modelling of plane strain tests on sands using a particular approach. Geotechnique 2005; 55(4): 297–306.

20.

Chen

McDowell

Thom

. Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid–reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions. Geotext Geomemb 2012; 35: 76–86.

21.

Chen C, McDowell GR and Thom NH. A study of geogrid-reinforced ballast using laboratory pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Geomechanics and Geoengineering 2013; 8(4): 244–253.

22.

Chen C. Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced railway ballast and track transition zones. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK, 2013.

23.

McDowell

. Discrete element modelling of ballast abrasion. Geotechnique 2006; 56(9): 651–656. .

24.

Winkler

. Die lehre von elasticitaet und festigkeit, Prague: H. Dominicus, 1867.

25.

Tomlinson

. Foundation design and construction 1995Sixth ed. Longman, London.

26.

Itasca Consulting Group. Particle flow code in three dimensions 2003.

27.

Awoleye EOA. Ballast type-ballast life predictions. British Rail Research Report LR CES 122, 1993. Derby, UK; British Rail.

28.

Aursudkij

McDowell

Collop

. Cyclic loading of railway ballast under triaxial conditions and in a railway test facility. Gran Mat 2009; 11(6): 391–401. .

29.

Huang

Tutumluer

. Discrete element modeling for fouled railroad ballast. Construct Build Mater 2011; 25(8): 3306–3312. .

30.

Olsson

. Finite element model co-ordinate analysis of structures subjected to moving loads. J Sound Vib 1985; 99: 1–12.

31.

Tensar International. Tensar geosynthetics in civil engineering. Report, 2009. Blackburn, UK: Tensar International Ltd.