Resolving operational parameters for a change-step type of maglev propulsion system

Abstract

The propulsion principle of the Transrapid maglev train is based on long stator linear synchronous motors. The stator winding in the guideway is divided into multiple segments that are individually switched on or off, with power being supplied to a given segment only as it is passed by the train. In commercial operation the power from substations is connected to the stator segments in one of two ways: change-step connection or three-step connection. Although each type of power supply has its advantages and application scope, the change-step connection is the central topic of interest in this study due to its salient features. When the train’s propulsion system uses this supply mode, the inverter control systems at the power stations must know exactly when the stator current begins to decline and the stator segment that it is supplying is about to change. Therefore, the timings to adjust the stator current are crucial to the operating system of a Transrapid train and should be determined from the dynamic conditions of the train. This paper aims to determine the timings for controlling the stator current. Based on calculated results, it is concluded that changing the power supply between stator sections can be smoothly performed using the proposed propulsion control system.

Keywords

Propulsion change-step changing between stator sections commutation ruck

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sakamoto

Shiromizu

. Propulsion control of superconducting linear synchronous motor vehicle. IEEE Trans Magn 1997; 33(5): 3460–3462.

Leonhard

Rhodes

Rakels

. Technical alternatives for a maglev system. IET Electron Power 1978; 24(4): 293–296.

Werle T and Binder A. Asynchronous linear machine as booster for railway vehicles. In: The IET conference on power electronics and variable drives, London, UK, 18–19 September 2000, pp.224–228.

Laithwaite

Eastham

Bolton

. Linear motors with transverse flux. IET Proc 1971; 118(12): 1761–1767.

Boudali

Williams

Giras

. A simulink simulation framework of a maglev model. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2003; 217(3): 227–236.

Cassat

Jufer

. MAGLEV projects technology aspects and choices. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2002; 12(1): 915–925.

Ono

Koga

Ohtsuki

. Japan's superconducting maglev train. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag 2002; 5(1): 9–15.

Hellinger

Mnich

. Linear motor-powered transportation history present status and future outlook. IEEE Proc 2009; 97(11): 1892–1900.

Davey

. Pulsed linear induction motors for maglev propulsion. IEEE Trans Magn 2000; 36(5): 3791–3797.

10.

Perreault

B.M

. Optimizing operation of segmented stator linear synchronous motors. IEEE Proc 2009; 97(11): 1777–1785.

11.

Fischperer R. Magnetschnellbahn für den schnellen regionalverkehr optimierung des langstatorantriebs und der energieversorgung. PhD Thesis, Technische Universitaet Berlin, Germany, 2006.

12.

Ikeda H, Kaga S, Osada Y, et al. Development of power supply system for Yamanashi Maglev Test Line. In: The Power Conversion Conference, Nagaoka, Japan, 3--6 August 1997, pp.37–41.

13.

Henning U, Hoke D and Nothhaft J. Development and operation results of TRANSRAPID propulsion system. In: The 18th international conference on magnetically levitated systems and linear drives, Shanghai, China, 26--28 October 2004, pp.759–770.

14.

Schah

Jehle

Naumann

. Transrapid und rad-schienen- hochgeschwindigkeitsbahn, ein gesamtlicher systemvergleich, First ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2006.

15.

Meins J. Wechselschrittverfahren bei ruckbegrenzung. Technischer Bericht, Dok. Nr. NTA/1612/07/89, 1989. Berlin, Germany: Thyssen Henschel.

16.

Fürst R. Anwendungsnahe dimensionierung und messtechnische überprüfung von langstator-linearmotoren für magnetschnellbahnen. PhD Thesis, Technische Universitaet Berlin, Germany, 1993.

17.

Steimel

. Elecktrische triebfahrzeuge und ihre energieversorgung: grundlagen und praxis, Second ed. Munich, Germay: Oldenbourg Industrie Verlag, 2006.

18.

Stephan A and Lascher A. Comparison of train resistances of TRANSRAPID and MLX01. In: The 18th international conference on magnetically levitated systems and linear drives, Shanghai, China, 26--28 October 2004, pp.224–234.

19.

Britcher

Wells

Renaud

. Aerodynamics of urban maglev vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2012; 226(6): 561–567.

20.

Tum M, Huhn G and Harbeke C. Design and development of the TRANSRAPID TR09. In: The 19th international conference on magnetically levitated systems and linear drives, Dresden, Germany, 13--15 September 2006.