This study proposes a materials-by-design approach to develop a laminated composite from alternating layers of flexible polyvinyl chloride and a cellulose-based adhesive, aiming to produce functional, high-precision planar components. The polymer–matrix composite was engineered to overcome key limitations of additive manufacturing, such as poor interlayer adhesion and low-dimensional accuracy. This novel material was compressed into 5 mm blocks and laser-cut to fabricate a pair of functional square gears. Tensile testing revealed a fourfold increase in tensile strength equal to 44.05 MPa for samples loaded parallel to the build direction compared to raw polyvinyl chloride. Quantitative T-peel tests confirmed strong bonding, with a steady-state force of 8–11 N and a calculated energy release rate of 760 J/m2, ensuring structural integrity and resistance to delamination. Functional testing of the manufactured gears confirmed smooth mating through 360° rotation, achieving a dimensional accuracy of 0.01 mm and a gear tooth flank surface roughness of 5.36 µm. The results demonstrate that this laminated composite offers superior in-plane mechanical properties, making it a promising candidate for planar mechanisms. The methodology is further validated as a high-precision, cost-effective, and rapid alternative to additive manufacturing, suggesting a significant potential for use in engineering education and functional prototyping.
NammiSKGuptaRPancholiK. Comparative strength and stability analysis of conventional and lighter composite flexible risers in ultra-deep water subsea environment. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng2025; 239: 666–677.
2.
SubbiahS. A shape-based introduction of manufacturing processes to undergraduate students. Manuf Lett2023; 35: 1222–1229.
GwangwavaN. Learning design thinking through a hands-on learning model. Int J Innov Teach Learn Higher Educat2021; 2: 1–9.
5.
FelderRMBrentR. Random thoughts: learning by doing. Chem Eng Educat2003; 37: 282–283.
6.
ForbesMHGibbonsMMHoopleGD. Hands-on engineering design in an undergraduate thermodynamics learning context. Int J Mech Eng Educat2024; 53: 530–548.
7.
GibsonRF. Principles of composite material mechanics. London: CRC Press, 2007, pp.45–61.
8.
MinetolaPIulianoLBassoliE, et al.Impact of additive manufacturing on engineering education—evidence from Italy. Rapid Prototyping J2015; 21: 535–555.
9.
WonjinJJangHIHariantoRA, et al.Introduction of 3D printing technology in the classroom for visually impaired students. J Visual Impair Blind2016; 110: 115–121.
10.
ThompsonMKMoroniGVanekerT, et al.Design for additive manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Annal2016; 65: 737–760.
11.
TofailSAKoumoulosEPBandyopadhyayA, et al.Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today2018; 21: 22–37.
12.
AlhamadIMAhmedWKAliHZ. Boosting teaching experience in mechanical engineering courses using additive manufacturing technologies. In: Advances in science and engineering technology international conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 26 March–28 March 2019, pp.1–6. Dubai. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714338.
13.
EllisBDGravesonJ. Teaching design and strength of materials via additive manufacturing project-based learning. Adv Eng Educat2022; 10: 19–45.
14.
KeaveneySGDowlingDP. Application of additive manufacturing in design and manufacturing engineering education. In: 2nd International symposium on small-scale intelligent manufacturing systems (SIMS), Ireland, 5 May–7 May 2018, pp.1–6. Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMS.2018.8355289.
15.
MotylBFilippiS. Trends in engineering education for additive manufacturing in the Industry 4.0 era: a systematic literature review. Int J Interact Des Manuf2012; 15: 103–106.
16.
SchellyCAnzaloneGWijnenB, et al.Open-source 3-D printing technologies for education: bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom. J Visual Lang Comput2015; 28: 226–237.
17.
ColoradoHAVelásquezEIMonteiroSN. Sustainability of additive manufacturing: the circular economy of materials and environmental perspectives. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9: 8221–8234.
18.
ToTTAl MahmudARanscombeC. A framework for integrating additive manufacturing into engineering education: perspectives of students and educators. Eur J Eng Educat2025; 50: 298–319.
19.
GodinaRRibeiroIMatosF, et al.Impact assessment of additive manufacturing on sustainable business models in Industry 4.0 context. Sustainability2020; 12: 1–21.
20.
DurgunIErtanR. Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping J2014; 20: 228–235.
21.
AhnSHMonteroMOdellD, et al.Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping J2002; 8: 248–257.
22.
SrivastavaSPandeS. Pedagogical evaluation of mechanical engineering education using additive manufacturing. In: Innovative design, analysis and development practices in aerospace and automotive engineering (I-DAD 2018), Singapore, Springer Singapore, 12 August–14 August 2018, pp.167–172. Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2697-4_18.
23.
BillingsCSiddiqueZLiuY. Enhancement of mechanical engineering education with additive manufacturing projects. In: ASME International mechanical engineering congress and exposition, New York, USA, 16 November–19 November 2020, p.V009T09A039. New York. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-24568.
24.
NewcomerJLHoekstraNLKittoKL, et al.Using rapid prototyping to enhance manufacturing and plastics engineering technology education. J Eng Technol2004; 21: 10.
EbnesajjadS. Handbook of biopolymers and biodegradable plastics: Properties, processing and applications. Oxford: William Andrew, 2012, pp.102–108.
27.
PetrieEM. Plastics and elastomers as adhesives. In: HarperCA (ed.) Handbook of plastics, elastomers and composites. London: McGraw-Hill, 2002, pp.397–505.
28.
LitvinFLFuentes-AznarAGonzalez-PerezI, et al.Noncircular gears: Design and generation. London: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp.87–89.
29.
LetcherTWaytashekM. Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. In: International mechanical engineering congress and exposition (ASME 2014), Montreal, Quebec, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 14 November–20 November 2014, p.V02AT02A014. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2014-39379.
30.
TorresJColeMOwjiA, et al.An approach for mechanical property optimization of fused deposition modeling with polylactic acid via design of experiments. Rapid Prototyping J2016; 22: 387–404.
31.
KinlochAJ. Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp.130–132.
32.
KawashitaLFMooreDRWilliamsJG. Protocols for the measurement of adhesive fracture toughness by peel tests. J Adhesion2006; 82: 973–995.
33.
ClyneTWHullD. An introduction to composite materials. London: Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp.81–83.
34.
PeilSGojzewskiHWurmFR. Reversible acetalization of cellulose: A platform for bio-based materials with adjustable properties and biodegradation. Chem Eng J2023; 452: 139280.
35.
BasarGDerOGuvencMA. AI-powered hybrid metaheuristic optimization for predicting surface roughness and kerf width in CO2 laser cutting of 3D-printed PLA-CF composites. J Thermoplastic Comp Mater2025; 38: 2688–2717.
36.
KechagiasJDVidakisNNinikasK, et al.Hybrid 3D printing of multifunctional polylactic acid/carbon black nanocomposites made with material extrusion and post-processed with CO2 laser cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 124: 1843–1861.
37.
DerOTasciMBasarG, et al.Intelligent modeling and prediction of CO2 laser cutting performance in FFF-printed thermoplastics using machine learning algorithms. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng2025; 11: 09544089251366429.
