Enhancing power plant energy efficiency through waste heat recovery (WHR) bottoming cycles appears to offer great potential in approaching the net-zero targets. This research aims to recover power from flue gases of a 25 MW gas turbine through utilization of a recuperated WHR cycle with supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) as its working fluid. Multi-objective optimization, based on the non-dominant sorting genetic algorithm II technique, was used to maximize the sCO2 WHR cycle thermal efficiency and output power, simultaneously. Optimization results suggested a recuperated sCO2 cycle capable of producing 1.3 MW electric power with a thermal efficiency of 16.5% at design condition. Results indicated possibility of generating even 3.2 MW of electricity with a thermal efficiency of 18.1% at the expense of slightly higher stream flow rates at design condition. To evaluate performance of the designed WHR cycle under different operating conditions, sensitivity analyses were conducted, including variations in compressor inlet pressure, temperature and pressure ratio. Topping cycle gas turbine off-design conditions was also investigated. Operating the gas turbine at 90% load resulted in combined cycle efficiency of about 35%, which is accompanied by 9% fuel saving and power plant emissions reductions. Moreover, the prospect of combined cycle thermal efficiency of 33.5% at 70% topping gas turbine load and 25% fuel saving appeared achievable. The estimated reduction in the power plant fuel consumption results in approximately 135 kgCO2/h emissions reduction from the topping gas turbine flue gases.
KhadseABlanchetteLKapatJ, et al.Optimization of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle for simple cycle gas turbines exhaust heat recovery using genetic algorithm. J Energy Resour Technol2018; 140: 071601.
3.
AlfaniDBinottiMMacchiE, et al.sCO2 power plants for waste heat recovery: design optimization and part-load operation strategies. Appl Therm Eng2021; 195: 117013.
4.
RomeiAPersicoGGaetaniP, et al.Design and computational assessment of a supercritical CO2 compressor for waste heat recovery applications. In: Proceedings of 5th European sCO2 Conference Energy System. 2023: 301–309.
5.
YangCDengYZhangN, et al.Optimal structure design of supercritical CO2 power cycle for gas turbine waste heat recovery: a superstructure method. Appl Therm Eng2021; 198: 117515.
6.
BonalumiDGiuffridaASicaliF. A case study of cascade supercritical CO2 power cycle for waste heat recovery from a small gas turbine. Energy Convers. Manag.: X2022; 14: 100212.
7.
ManjunathKSharmaOPTyagiSK, et al.Thermodynamic analysis of a supercritical/transcritical CO2-based waste heat recovery cycle for shipboard power and cooling applications. Energy Convers Manag2018; 155: 262–275.
8.
PersicoGSanchezDTAlfaniD, et al. sCO2 bottoming cycle for off-shore applications–an optimization study. In: Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air. Boston, MA, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2023, pp.V012T28A017.
9.
OlumayegunOWangM. Dynamic modelling and control of supercritical CO2 power cycle using waste heat from industrial processes. Fuel2019; 249: 89–102.
10.
MarchionniMBianchiGTassouSA. Review of supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) technologies for high-grade waste heat to power conversion. SN Appl Sci2020; 2: 611.
11.
LiuLYangQCuiG. Supercritical carbon dioxide (s-CO2) power cycle for waste heat recovery: a review from thermodynamic perspective. Processes2020; 8: 1461.
12.
MohagheghiM.Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycles. PhD Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida; 2015.
13.
JacobFW.Performance and preliminary design of combined cycle aero engines utilising supercritical carbon dioxide. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield; 2018.
14.
WrightSAConboyTMRochauGE. Supercritical CO2 power cycle development summary at Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Sandia National Lab (SNL-NM), 2011.
15.
WhiteMTBianchiGChaiL, et al.Review of supercritical CO2 technologies and systems for power generation. Appl Therm Eng2021; 185: 116447.
16.
CrespiFM.Thermo-economic assessment of supercritical CO2 power cycles for concentrated solar power plants. PhD Thesis, University of Seville, Seville; 2019.
17.
CaoYRenJSangY, et al.Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a gas turbine and cascade CO2 combined cycle. Energy Convers Manag2017; 144: 193–204.
18.
AbbasiHRYavarinasabARoohbakhshS. Waste heat management of direct carbon fuel cell with advanced supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle–a thermodynamic-electrochemical modeling approach. J CO2 Util2021; 51: 101630.
19.
WuPMaYGaoC, et al.A review of research and development of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle technology in nuclear engineering applications. Nucl Eng Des2020; 368: 110767.
WalnumHTNeksåPNordLO, et al.Modelling and simulation of CO2 (carbon dioxide) bottoming cycles for offshore oil and gas installations at design and off-design conditions. Energy2013; 59: 513–520.
22.
SarkarJ. Second law analysis of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle. Energy2009; 34: 1172–1178.
23.
AnconaMABianchiMBranchiniL, et al.Systematic comparison of ORC and s-CO2 combined heat and power plants for energy harvesting in industrial gas turbines. Energies2021; 14: 3402.
24.
TurjaAISadatKNHasanMM, et al.Waste heat recuperation in advanced supercritical CO2 power cycles with organic Rankine cycle integration & optimization using machine learning methods. Int J Thermofluids2024; 22: 100612.
25.
OchoaGVForeroJDRojasJP. Thermoeconomic analysis of a combined supercritical CO2 reheating under different configurations of organic Rankine cycle ORC as a bottoming cycle. Heliyon2022; 8: e12230.
26.
KimYMSohnJLYoonES. Supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery from gas turbine. Energy2017; 118: 893–905.
27.
SabzpoushanSMoradMRRahnamaHE. A combined cooling and power transcritical CO2 cycle for waste heat recovery from gas turbines. Thermal Sci Eng Progress2022; 34: 101423.
28.
QuoilinSVan Den BroekMDeclayeS, et al.Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2013; 22: 168–186.
29.
FatigatiFDi GiovineGCipolloneR. Model-based optimization of a sliding Vane rotary pump for micro-organic Rankine cycle. Energies2024; 18: 97.
30.
DuJGuoJZhangZ, et al.A triple cascade gas turbine waste heat recovery system based on supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: thermal analysis and optimization. Energy Convers Manage: X2022; 16: 100297.
31.
YuASuWLinX, et al.Recent trends of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: bibliometric analysis and research review. Nuclear Eng Technol2021; 53: 699–714.
32.
BagliettoGMaccariniSTraversoA, et al.Techno-economic comparison of supercritical CO2, steam, and organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery applications. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2023; 145: 041021.
33.
ThielensVDemeyerFPaepeWD. Performance of sCO2 cycles for waste heat recovery and techno-economic perspective as gas turbine bottoming cycle. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2025; 147: 041023.
BrunKFriedmanPDennisR.Fundamentals and applications of supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) based power cycles. 1st ed. Duxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2017, pp. 61–66.
36.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Power piping: ASME B31.1. New York, NY: ASME, 2022.
37.
CarlsonMAlvarezF. Design of a 1 MWth supercritical carbon dioxide primary heat exchanger test system. In: Energy sustainability. 83631. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Sandia National Lab (SNL-NM): American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020, pp.V001T02A014. The publishing rights were granted to SNL in 2021.
38.
ChaJEParkJHLeeG, et al.500 Kw supercritical CO2 power generation system for waste heat recovery: system design and compressor performance test results. Appl Therm Eng2021; 194: 117028.
39.
QinLXieGMaY, et al.Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a waste heat recovery system with a combined supercritical/transcritical CO2 cycle. Energy2023; 265: 126332.
40.
MusgroveGLePierresRNashJ.Heat exchangers for supercritical CO2 power cycle applications. In: The 4th International Symposium on Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2014.
41.
ChenJLiuLLiaoG, et al.Design and off-design performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles for gas turbine waste heat recovery. Appl Therm Eng2023; 235: 121295.
42.
KwonJSSonSHeoJY, et al.Compact heat exchangers for supercritical CO2 power cycle application. Energy Convers Manage2020; 209: 112666.
43.
AhmedMAyubASheikhNA, et al.Thermodynamic optimization and performance study of supercritical CO2 thermodynamic power cycles with dry cooling using response surface method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2023; 142: 106675.
44.
WangDRenXZhangJ, et al.Comparative investigation on techno-economics of cascade supercritical CO2 combined cycles for waste heat recovery of typical gas turbines. Thermal Sci Eng Prog2023; 42: 101941.
45.
YousefMSSantanaD. Thermo-economic assessment and optimization of an innovative tri-generation system using supercritical CO2 power system and LNG cold energy recovery. Energy Convers Manag X2024; 21: 100516.
46.
SpanRWagnerW. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. J Phys Chem Ref Data1996; 25: 1509–1596.
47.
WrightSAConboyTMSuo-AnttilaAJ. Summary of the Sandia supercritical CO2 development program. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Sandia National Lab, 2011.
48.
MohagheghiMKapatJ. Thermodynamic optimization of recuperated S-CO2 Brayton cycles for solar tower applications. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air. San Antonio, TX, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013, pp.V002T07A013.
49.
QiuYErqiELiQ. Triple-objective optimization of SCO2 Brayton cycles for next-generation solar power tower. Energies2023; 16: 5316.
50.
XuLNiuXHongW, et al.A comprehensive multi-objective optimization study on the thermodynamic performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle incorporating multi-stage main compressor intermediate cooling. Energies2024; 17: 6372.
51.
DebKPratapAAgarwalS, et al.A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6: 182–197.
52.
ManenteGCostaM. On the conceptual design of novel supercritical CO2 power cycles for waste heat recovery. Energies2020; 13: 370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
