This paper investigates the laser cutting performance regarding CO2 of four fused filament fabrication-printed thermoplastics, namely polylactic acid (PLA), carbon fiber reinforced PLA (PLA-CF), acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). We investigate kerf open deviation, kerf angle, bottom heat-affected zone, and material removal rate. A total of 72 trial runs were conducted with various states of material type, plate thickness, laser power, and cutting speed. The resulting experimental data were then fed into several machine learning algorithms to assess and compare their predictive abilities: linear regression, decision tree, random forest, CatBoost, support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors, and multi-layer perceptron. Of all the machine learning algorithms, random forest and multi-layer perceptron performed best with high R2 in conjunction with low error metrics for all response variables. The study also shows that PLA-CF achieves the highest material removal rate, while ASA and PETG yield high dimensional stability with minimum kerf and thermal distortion. Hence, the research study has made it clear that, with machine learning algorithms, the laser cutting performance can be modeled for additively manufactured polymers, and the processing parameters can be optimized for laser cutting; thus, this will enhance the smart manufacturing approaches for the processing of polymers.
KüçükYGökMSKurşuncuB, et al.Dry sliding wear behavior of additively manufactured polylactic acid (PLA) with different surface texture. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2023. 10.1177/09544089231222254.
2.
DerOBaşarG. Investigation of the effects of process parameters on machining performance in laser cutting of 3D-printed PLA. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry2025; 9: 9–20.
3.
WangZWangLTangF, et al.Multi-material additive manufacturing via fused deposition modeling 3D printing: A systematic review on the material feeding mechanism. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2024. 10.1177/09544089231223316.
4.
MazaheriASAbediniVKamiA. Effects of raster angle and composition of layers on tensile and flexural properties of PLA-PLA/Al multimaterial manufactured by fused deposition modeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2025; 239: 213–220.
5.
KechagiasJDNinikasKVakouftsiF, et al.Optimization of laser beam parameters during processing of ASA 3D-printed plates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 130: 527–539.
6.
SabriHMehrabiOKhoranM, et al.Leveraging CO2 laser cutting for enhancing fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed PETG parts through postprocessing. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2024. 10.1177/09544089241274037.
7.
SavranMAydinLAyazA, et al.A new strategy for manufacturing, modeling, and optimization of 3D printed polylactide based on multiple nonlinear neuro regression analysis and stochastic optimization methods. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2024. 10.1177/09544089241272909.
8.
BasarGDerO. Multi-objective optimization of process parameters for laser cutting polyethylene using fuzzy AHP-based MCDM methods. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2025. 10.1177/09544089251319202.
9.
DerOBaşarGOrduM. Statistical investigation of the effect of CO2 laser cutting parameters on kerf width and heat affected zone in thermoplastic materials. Journal of Materials and Mechatronics: A2023; 4: 459–474.
10.
DerOOrduMBasarG. Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems. Mater Test2024; 66: 1700–1719.
11.
CaiazzoFCurcioFDaurelioG, et al.Laser cutting of different polymeric plastics (PE, PP and PC) by a CO2 laser beam. J Mater Process Technol2005; 159: 279–285.
12.
WuCRongYHuangY, et al.Laser cutting of thermoplastic film: mechanism and processing technology. Sci China Technol Sci2022; 65: 2068–2078.
13.
DerOOrduMBaşarG. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters for polyethylene thermoplastic material by integrating data envelopment analysis and SWARA-based CoCoSo approach. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi2024; 7: 638–661.
14.
ÖgeTÖÖgeM. Prediction of tribological properties of PC-PBT/GNP-MWCNT nanocomposites using machine learning models. J Appl Polym Sci2025; 142: e56834.
15.
PlathottamSJRzoncaALakhnoriR, et al.A review of artificial intelligence applications in manufacturing operations. J Adv Manuf Process2023; 5: e10159.
16.
ÖzkülMKuncanFUlkirO. Predicting mechanical properties of FDM-produced parts using machine learning approaches. J Appl Polym Sci2025; 142: e56899.
17.
MadićMGadallahMHPetkovićD. Analysis of process efficiency in laser fusion cutting and some single- and multi-objective optimization aspects. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2022; 236: 589–599.
18.
BasarGDerOGuvencMA. AI-powered hybrid metaheuristic optimization for predicting surface roughness and kerf width in CO2 laser cutting of 3D-printed PLA-CF composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater2025. 10.1177/08927057251344183.
19.
KechagiasJDNinikasKPetousisM, et al.An investigation of surface quality characteristics of 3D printed PLA plates cut by CO2 laser using experimental design. Mater Manuf Processes2021; 36: 1544–1553.
20.
KechagiasJDFountasNANinikasK, et al.Surface characteristics investigation of 3D-printed PET-G plates during CO2 laser cutting. Mater Manuf Processes2022; 37: 1347–1357.
21.
AlhawsawiAMMoustafaEBFujiiM, et al.Kerf characteristics during CO2 laser cutting of polymeric materials: experimental investigation and machine learning-based prediction. Eng Sci Technol Int J2023; 46: 101519.
22.
ShahKABrüttingCAlbuquerqueRQ, et al.Machine learning investigation of polylactic acid bead foam extrusion. J Appl Polym Sci2024; 141: e55693.
23.
TanhaeiBAyatiALahtinenM, et al.A magnetic mesoporous chitosan based core-shells biopolymer for anionic dye adsorption: kinetic and isothermal study and application of ANN. J Appl Polym Sci2016; 133: 43466.
24.
WangXPetrůM. A novel machine learning framework informed by the fractional calculus dynamic model of hybrid glass/jute woven composite. J Appl Polym Sci2024; 141: e55888.
25.
MadićMRadovanovićMGostimirovićM. Ann modeling of kerf transfer in CO2 laser cutting and optimization of cutting parameters using Monte Carlo method. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations2015; 6: 33–42.
26.
CzajkowskiMJurczukKKretowskiM. Steering the interpretability of decision trees using lasso regression - an evolutionary perspective. Inf Sci2023; 638: 118944.
27.
LuoMWangYXieY, et al.Combination of feature selection and catboost for prediction: the first application to the estimation of aboveground biomass. Forests2021; 12: 216.
28.
HalderRKUddinMNUddinM, et al.Enhancing K-nearest neighbor algorithm: a comprehensive review and performance analysis of modifications. J Big Data2024; 11: 113.
29.
KouadriSPandeCBPanneerselvamB, et al.Prediction of irrigation groundwater quality parameters using ANN, LSTM, and MLR models. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 21067–21091.
30.
VishwakarmaDKKumarPYadavKK, et al.Evaluation of catboost method for predicting weekly pan evaporation in subtropical and sub-humid regions. Pure Appl Geophys2024; 181: 719–747.
31.
DingXLiuJYangF, et al.Random radial basis function kernel-based support vector machine. J Franklin Inst2021; 358: 10121–10140.
32.
NaskathJSivakamasundariGBegumAAS. A study on different deep learning algorithms used in deep neural nets: MLP SOM and DBN. Wirel Pers Commun2023; 128: 2913–2936.
33.
StoffelMANakagawaSSchielzethH. Partr2: partitioning R2 in generalized linear mixed models. PeerJ2021; 9: e11414.
34.
KoutsandreasDSpiliotisEPetropoulosF, et al.On the selection of forecasting accuracy measures. J Oper Res Soc2022; 73: 937–954.
35.
ElsheikhAHSharshirSWAbd ElazizM, et al.Modeling of solar energy systems using artificial neural network: a comprehensive review. Sol Energy2019; 180: 622–639.
36.
MilovanovićAGalațanuS-VSedmakA, et al.Layer thickness influence on impact properties of FDM printed PLA material. Procedia Struct Integrity2024; 56: 190–197.
37.
XuZRazaviN. Exploring the impact of thickness, scale and printing sequence on the tensile and fracture properties of PLA specimens fabricated via fused deposition modeling. Eng Fail Anal2024; 163: 108587.
38.
KumarKNBabuPD. Investigation on polymer hybrid composite through CO2 laser machining for precise machining conditions. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2024; 25: 1043–1061.
39.
ElsheikhAHDengWShowaibEA. Improving laser cutting quality of polymethylmethacrylate sheet: experimental investigation and optimization. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9: 1325–1339.
40.
KhoshaimABElsheikhAHMoustafaEB, et al.Experimental investigation on laser cutting of PMMA sheets: effects of process factors on kerf characteristics. J Mater Res Technol2021; 11: 235–246.
41.
AminMYuanSIsrarA, et al.Development of cutting force prediction model for vibration-assisted slot milling of carbon fiber reinforced polymers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 94: 3863–3874.
42.
AminMYuanSKhanMZ, et al.Development of a generalized cutting force prediction model for carbon fiber reinforced polymers based on rotary ultrasonic face milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 93: 2655–2666.
43.
KechagiasJDFountasNANinikasK, et al.Kerf geometry and surface roughness optimization in CO2 laser processing of FFF plates utilizing neural networks and genetic algorithms approaches. J Manuf Mater Process2023; 7: 77.
44.
KechagiasJDNinikasKPetousisM, et al.Laser cutting of 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene plates for dimensional and surface roughness optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 119: 2301–2315.
45.
MoradiMKarami MoghadamMShamsborhanM, et al.Post-processing of FDM 3D-printed polylactic acid parts by laser beam cutting. Polymers (Basel)2020; 12: 550.
46.
RužiakIKristakLAdijansI, et al.Enhancing CO2 laser cutting efficiency for diverse wood species using artificial neural networks. Forests2025; 16: 881.
47.
TaoNChenGFanL, et al.Temperature-dependent material removal during pulsed laser processing of CFRP composites. Opt Laser Technol2021; 144: 107445.
48.
İplikçiHBarisikMTürkdoğanC, et al.Effects of nanosecond laser ablation parameters on surface modification of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Compos Mater2023; 57: 2843–2855.
49.
MoushiOMAraNHelaluddinM, et al.Enhancing the accuracy and explainability of heart disease prediction models through interpretable machine learning techniques. In: 2023 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainable Development (ICICT4SD). Dhaka, Bangladesh: IEEE, 2023, pp.1–6.
50.
BeleteDMHuchaiahMD. Grid search in hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for prediction of HIV/AIDS test results. Int J Comput Appl2022; 44: 875–886.
51.
KusumaAIHuangY-M. Performance comparison of machine learning models for kerf width prediction in pulsed laser cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 123: 2703–2718.
52.
KumarPSKumariKMohapatraS, et al.Catboost ensemble approach for diabetes risk prediction at early stages. In: 2021 1st Odisha International Conference on Electrical Power Engineering, Communication and Computing Technology (ODICON). Bhubaneswar, India: IEEE, 2021, pp.1–6.
53.
UppalapatiSParamasivamPKilariN, et al.Precision biochar yield forecasting employing random forest and XGBoost with Taylor diagram visualization. Sci Rep2025; 15: 7105.
54.
YuHLuJZhangG. An online robust support vector regression for data streams. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng2020; 34: 150–163.
55.
DakiHSaadBEl HannaniA, et al.Trees vs neurons: generalizability for electrical consumption forecasting in educational institutions. In: 2024 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences (ICDS). Marrakech, Morocco: IEEE, 2024, pp.1–6.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
