Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Multi-scale reinforcement effects on co-cure GFRP joints: Synergistic influence of chopped glass strand mat and graphene nano-particles on joint strength and failure mechanism
The present study investigates the effect of multi-scale reinforcement such as graphene nano-particles (GNP) and chopped glass strand mat (CGSM) on flexural and shear strength of the glass fibre reinforced composite single-lap joints (SLJ) using a co-cure manufacturing technique. Experimental results depicted that SLJ with multi-scale reinforcement enhances the strength of joint drastically. SLJ prepared by 0.5 wt.% GNP with CGSM reinforcement enhanced the shear strength by 67.2% compared to reinforcement-free SLJ due to the formation of a rough surface over the surface bond area. Thus, it improves the interfacial bonding between fibre and matrix. On the other hand, 0.75 wt.% GNP with CGSM reinforcement enhanced the flexural strength by 47.2%. This study demonstrated that selecting the appropriate proportion of GNP with CGSM can improve the shear and flexural behaviour of composite joint. Also, fractography findings reported that higher concentrations of GNP with CGSM reinforcement leads to agglomeration, reducing the joint strength.
IMPIAJKASenthilR. Experimental investigation on thermomechanical behavior of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2023; 237: 2373–2382.
2.
SwikkerKRJKanagasabapathyHNeethi ManickamI. Effect of MWCNT on mechanical characterization of glass/carbon hybrid composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2022; 236: 2155–2163.
3.
RoutLNMishraDSwainPTR. Physical, thermal, and mechanical characterization of ceramic (SiC) filled woven glass fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. Silicon2024; 16: 1731–1741.
4.
KwonJSKimJSLeeSY, et al.A mechanically fastened composite laminate joint and progressive failure analysis. Adv Compos Mater2018; 27: 439–456.
5.
CamanhoPPCatalanottiG. Mechanical fastening of composite and composite-metal structures. Joining of Polymer‐Metal Hybrid Structures: Principles and Applications2018 Feb 27: 187–202.
6.
KarthikeyanNNaveenJ. Progress in adhesive-bonded composite joints: a comprehensive review. J Reinf Plast Compos2024; 27: 07316844241248236.
7.
BaneaMDDa SilvaLFM. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Design Appl2009; 223: 1–18.
8.
BudheSBaneaMDde BarrosS, et al.An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int J Adhes Adhes2017; 72: 30–42.
9.
GauravASinghKK. Fatigue behavior of FRP composites and CNT-embedded FRP composites: a review. Polym Compos2018; 39: 1785–1808.
10.
QaidiSYahiaATayehBA, et al.3D printed geopolymer composites: a review. Mater Today Sustain2022; 20: 100240.
11.
MahboubizadehSSadeqAArzaqiZ, et al.Advancements in fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites: an extensive review. Discover Materials2024; 4: 22.
12.
ZhangXJuYZhuA, et al.Fatigue behavior of single-lap adhesive joints with similar and dissimilar adherends under cyclic loading: a combined experimental and simulation study. Mater Today Commun2023; 37: 107215.
13.
DarlaVRBenBSSai SrinadhKV. Evaluation of strength and performance for a single lap bonded joint by insertion of structural elements in adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes2022; 118: 103240.
14.
SongMGKweonJHChoiJH, et al.Effect of manufacturing methods on the shear strength of composite single-lap bonded joints. Compos Struct2010; 92: 2194–2202.
15.
DhilipkumarTRajeshM. Effect of manufacturing processes and multi-walled carbon nanotube loading on mechanical and dynamic properties of glass fiber reinforced composites. Polym Compos2022; 43: 1772–1786.
16.
MoroniFPirondiAPernecheleC, et al.Comparative investigation of mode I and II fracture toughness of directly cured CFRP and co-cured bonded CFRP joints. In: Procedia Structural Integrity. 2018, pp. 86–91. Elsevier B.V.
17.
WeiYJinXLuoQ, et al.Adhesively bonded joints—a review on design, manufacturing, experiments, modeling and challenges. Compos B Eng2024; 276: 111225.
18.
ŞenyurtMAEkremMDüzcükoğluH, et al.Effect of composite to aluminum single lap joints reinforced with graphene-doped nylon 6.6 nanofibers. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part E: J Process Mech Eng2021; 235: 1269–1278.
19.
AkpinarIAGültekinKAkpinarS, et al.Experimental analysis on the single-lap joints bonded by a nanocomposite adhesives which obtained by adding nanostructures. Compos B Eng2017; 110: 420–428.
20.
JojibabuPJagannathamMHaridossP, et al.Effect of different carbon nano-fillers on rheological properties and lap shear strength of epoxy adhesive joints. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 82: 53–64.
21.
DhilipkumarTRajeshM. Influence of manufacturing process and GFRP pin loading on shear and dynamic behaviour of composite joints. J Adhes2023; 99: 538–557.
22.
QuanDCarolanDRougeC, et al.Mechanical and fracture properties of epoxy adhesives modified with graphene nanoplatelets and rubber particles. Int J Adhes Adhes2018; 81: 21–29.
23.
HiremathVSReddyDM. Influence of GNP nanoparticles on shear and dynamic behaviour of flat-joggle-flat composite joints. Mater Lett2023; 348: 134713.
24.
DevarajSJArputhamAJK. Influence of chopped fibers on the interfacial bonding of glass fiber reinforced epoxy skin/polyurethane core in a sandwich composite. Polym Compos2022; 43: 5563–5572.
25.
SiddharthaGK. Mechanical and abrasive wear characterization of bidirectional and chopped E-glass fiber reinforced composite materials. Mater Des2012; 35: 467–479.
26.
VenugopalASudhagarPE. Enhancing shear and flexural strength of single lap composite joints with a graphene nanoparticle-reinforced adhesive through a co-curing technique. Polym Compos2024; 45: 4202–4220.
27.
BaliGTopkayaT. Effect of graphene nano-particle reinforcement on the fatigue behavior of adhesively bonded single lap joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2023; 120: 103279.
28.
DhilipkumarTRajeshM. Enhancing shear strength and structural stiffness of composite joint with carbon nanotube reinforced adhesive through co-bonding technique. J Adhes Sci Technol2022; 36: 2143–2157.
29.
KarthikeyanNNaveenJ. Flexural and vibration behaviour of co-cured CFRP composite joints with MWCNT-modified adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol2025; 39: 750–777.
30.
BalajiSRajeshM. Shear properties and failure mechanisms of adhesive bonded composite joint: effect of glass particle reinforcement. Polym Compos2024; 45: 9977–9994.
31.
DhilipkumarTRajeshM. Effect of using multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy adhesive in enhancing glass fiber reinforced polymer composite through cocure manufacturing technique. Polym Compos2021; 42: 3758–3772.
32.
DhilipkumarTRajeshMSathyaseelanP, et al.Evaluating structural strength and vibrational characteristics of silicon carbide incorporated adhesively bonded single lap joints. J Adhes Sci Technol2024; 38: 2959–2972.
