Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Prediction of dimensional deviation and quality tolerance class in the production of AlSi10Mg alloy parts with laser powder bed fusion using machine learning algorithms
Metal-based workpieces can be produced additively with the selective laser melting (SLM) technique, which is one of the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) methods. However, due to complex production parameters, the dimensional deviation and quality tolerance class of the produced parts cannot be predicted. This situation causes the need for secondary operations such as turning, milling, grinding, or polishing after production and even increases the amount of scrap. These processes are quite costly as they require extra time, labor, and machinery. This study aims to clarify complex manufacturing parameters, predict dimensional deviation with a high success rate before production, and categorize part quality tolerance classes with high accuracy. To examine the effect of manufacturing variables using dimensional accuracy, parts were produced at various laser power and scanning speeds, and features like length, width, thickness, and radius were measured. Dimensional changes were more significant at extreme parameter values and minimized at medium values. Additionally, extensive datasets were generated using manufacturing parameters and physics knowledge, and various machine learning models were applied and analyzed in detail. As a result of exploratory data analysis, dimensional deviation is estimated with a high success rate, while the part quality tolerance class can be categorized with a high precision rate. With the proposed method, proactive measures can be taken for possible errors before production. By effectively determining production parameters during the process planning phase, the part qualification process will become more efficient. Therefore, advantages such as reducing the cost of scrap parts, the absence of secondary processes, and saving cost and time will be achieved, and production comparable to traditional production methods will be possible.
HagedornY. Laser additive manufacturing of ceramic components: materials, processes, and mechanisms. Laser Additive Manuf2017: 163–180.
3.
TangHQianMLiuN, et al.Effect of powder reuse times on additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V by selective electron beam melting. JOM2015; 67: 555–563.
4.
ArdilaLGarciandiaFGonzález-DíazJ, et al.Effect of IN718 recycled powder reuse on properties of parts manufactured by means of selective laser melting. Phys Procedia2014; 56: 99–107.
5.
PrashanthKGScudinoSKlaussHJ, et al.Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–12Si produced by selective laser melting: effect of heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 590: 153–160.
6.
TrevisanFCalignanoFLorussoM, et al.On the selective laser melting (SLM) of the AlSi10Mg alloy: process, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Materials (Basel)2017; 10: 76.
7.
BrandlEHeckenbergerUHolzingerV, et al.Additive manufactured AlSi10Mg samples using selective laser melting (SLM): microstructure, high cycle fatigue, and fracture behavior. Mater Des2012; 34: 159–169.
8.
OlakanmiEOCochraneRFDalgarnoKW. A review on selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM) of aluminium alloy powders: processing, microstructure, and properties. Prog Mater Sci2015; 74: 401–477.
9.
OrmeMEGschweitlMFerrariM, et al.Additive manufacturing of lightweight, optimized, metallic components suitable for space flight. J Spacecr Rockets2017; 54: 1050–1059.
10.
KempenKThijsLVan HumbeeckJ, et al.Mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg produced by selective laser melting. Phys Procedia2012; 39: 439–446.
11.
PonnusamyPRahman RashidRAMasoodSH, et al.Mechanical properties of SLM-printed aluminium alloys: a review. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 4301.
12.
ZhuXDongAWangL, et al.Influence of inclination angle, shape and size of the flow channels on the AlSi10Mg complex products fabricated by selective laser melting. J Manuf Process2022; 83: 157–171.
13.
PatuelliCCestinoEFrullaG, et al.FEM simulation of AlSi10Mg artifact for additive manufacturing process calibration with industrial-computed tomography validation. Materials (Basel)2023; 16: 4754.
14.
BobanJAhmedAJithinrajE, et al.Polishing of additive manufactured metallic components: retrospect on existing methods and future prospects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 121: 83–125.
15.
HanXZhuHNieX, et al.Investigation on selective laser melting AlSi10Mg cellular lattice strut: molten pool morphology, surface roughness and dimensional accuracy. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 392.
16.
SingSLWiriaFEYeongWY. Selective laser melting of lattice structures: a statistical approach to manufacturability and mechanical behavior. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2018; 49: 170–180.
17.
SiyambaşY. Investigation of the effect of manufacturing parameters on geometric tolerances of parts produced by additive manufacturing. Manuf Eng2023, PhD(110-111).
18.
KamarudinKWahabMShayfullZ, et al.Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness analysis for AlSi10Mg produced by selective laser melting (SLM). In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 2016, EDP Sciences.
19.
MaamounAHXueYFElbestawiMA, et al.Effect of selective laser melting process parameters on the quality of al alloy parts: powder characterization, density, surface roughness, and dimensional accuracy. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 2343.
20.
Subbaian KaliamoorthyPSubbiahRBensinghJ, et al.Benchmarking the complex geometric profiles, dimensional accuracy and surface analysis of printed parts. Rapid Prototyp J2020; 26: 319–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0024.
21.
WaqasMHeDElahiH, et al.Study of the surface and dimensional quality of the AlSi10Mg thin-wall components manufactured by selective laser melting. J Compos Sci2021; 5: 126.
22.
AhmedAMajeedAAttaZ, et al.Dimensional quality and distortion analysis of thin-walled alloy parts of AlSi10Mg manufactured by selective laser melting. J Manuf Mater Process2019; 3: 51.
23.
GiteREWakchaureVD. A review on process parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Mater Today Proc2023; 72: 966–986.
24.
ReadNWangWEssaK, et al.Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: process optimisation and mechanical properties development. Mater Des2015; 65: 417–424.
25.
AltıparmakSCYardleyVAShiZ, et al.Challenges in additive manufacturing of high-strength aluminium alloys and current developments in hybrid additive manufacturing. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf2021; 4: 246–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.12.004.
26.
AboulkhairNTEverittNMAshcroftI, et al.Reducing porosity in AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting. Additive Manuf2014; 1: 77–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.001.
27.
WeiPWeiZChenZ, et al.The AlSi10Mg samples produced by selective laser melting: single track, densification, microstructure and mechanical behavior. Appl Surf Sci2017; 408: 38–50.
28.
KimuraTNakamotoT. Microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 (AlSi7Mg0.3) aluminum alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des2016; 89: 1294–1301.
29.
AhmedAWahabMRausA, et al.Effects of selective laser melting parameters on relative density of AlSi10Mg. Int J Eng Technol2016; 8: 2552–2557.
30.
SharmaRKumarSSahaR. Investigation of laser sintered AlSi10Mg specimens for density and surface roughness. In: IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, IOP Publishing.
31.
SiyambaşYTurgutY. Experimental and statistical investigation of mechanical properties and surface roughness in additive manufacturing with selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45: 515.
32.
MaamounAHXueYFElbestawiMA, et al.The effect of selective laser melting process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al6061 and AlSi10Mg alloys. Materials (Basel)2018; 12: 12.
33.
ChenYWangHWuY, et al.Predicting the printability in selective laser melting with a supervised machine learning method. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 5063.
34.
ChaudhrySSoulaïmaniA. A comparative study of machine learning methods for computational modeling of the selective laser melting additive manufacturing process. Appl Sci2022; 12: 2324.
35.
HertleinNDeshpandeSVenugopalV, et al.Prediction of selective laser melting part quality using hybrid Bayesian network. Additive Manuf2020; 32: 101089.
36.
MuhammadWBrahmeAPIbragimovaO, et al.A machine learning framework to predict local strain distribution and the evolution of plastic anisotropy & fracture in additively manufactured alloys. Int J Plast2021; 136: 102867.
37.
TridelloACiampagliaABertoF, et al.Assessment of the critical defect in additive manufacturing components through machine learning algorithms. Appl Sci2023; 13: 4294.
38.
MinervaGAwdMTenkampJ, et al.Machine learning-assisted extreme value statistics of anomalies in AlSi10Mg manufactured by L-PBF for robust fatigue strength predictions. Mater Des2023; 235: 112392.
39.
ShiTSunJLiJ, et al.Machine learning based very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Fatigue2023; 171: 107585.
40.
TheedaSJagdaleSHRavichanderBB, et al.Optimization of process parameters in laser powder bed fusion of SS 316L parts using artificial neural networks. Metals (Basel)2023; 13: 842.
41.
MiaoHYusofFAb KarimMS, et al.Process parameters optimisation for selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg-316L multi-materials using machine learning method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 129: 3093–3108.
42.
WangHLiBXuanF-Z. A dimensionally augmented and physics-informed machine learning for quality prediction of additively manufactured high-entropy alloy. J Mater Process Technol2022; 307: 117637.
43.
LiBZhangWXuanF. Machine-learning prediction of selective laser melting additively manufactured part density by feature-dimension-ascended Bayesian network model for process optimisation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 121: 4023–4038.
44.
KladovasilakisNCharalampousPKostavelisI, et al.Impact of metal additive manufacturing parameters on the powder bed fusion and direct energy deposition processes: a comprehensive review. Prog Additive Manuf2021; 6: 349–365.
45.
GuptaMKKorkmazMEYılmazH, et al.Real-time monitoring and measurement of energy characteristics in sustainable machining of titanium alloys. Measurement (Mahwah NJ)2024; 224: 113937.
46.
HanyUHyeNMAkterL. Path loss based wireless capsule endoscope localization using machine learning regression. IEEE Access2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3329812.
47.
BreimanL. Random forests. Mach Learn2001; 45: 5–32.
48.
HeMZhangL. Machine learning and symbolic regression investigation on stability of MXene materials. Comput Mater Sci2021; 196: 110578.
49.
AkdulumASüzgünolMKayirY. Prediction of feed force with machine learning algorithms in boring of AISI P20 plastic mold steel. Mater Today Commun2024; 41: 110704.
50.
YuJQiaoZTangW, et al.Blockchain-based decision tree classification in distributed networks. Intell Autom Soft Comput2021; 16: 10–14.
51.
SiyambaşYAkdulumA. Prediction of surface roughness using different features in vortex cooled turning process of Ti6Al4V alloy. Measurement (Mahwah NJ)2024; 237: 115258.
52.
KurzynowskiTStopyraWGruberK, et al.Effect of scanning and support strategies on relative density of SLM-ed H13 steel in relation to specimen size. Materials (Basel)2019; 12: 239.
53.
LiuZLiCFangX, et al.Energy consumption in additive manufacturing of metal parts. Procedia Manuf2018; 26: 834–845.
54.
BuchbinderDMeinersWPirchN, et al.Investigation on reducing distortion by preheating during manufacture of aluminum components using selective laser melting. J Laser Appl2014; 26.
55.
JiaQGuD. Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties. J Alloys Compd2014; 585: 713–721.
56.
GuDDMeinersWWissenbachK, et al.Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev2012; 57: 133–164.
57.
McGregorDJBimroseMVShaoC, et al.Using machine learning to predict dimensions and qualify diverse part designs across multiple additive machines and materials. Additive Manuf2022; 55: 102848.
58.
GuDShenY. Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des2009; 30: 2903–2910.
59.
MurrLEGaytanSMRamirezDA, et al.Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. J Mater Sci Technol2012; 28: 1–14.
60.
CharlesAElkaseerAMuellerT, et al.Effect of process parameters on dimensional accuracy of down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Additive Manuf2018; 10: 850.
61.
ZhangLZhangSZhuH, et al.Horizontal dimensional accuracy prediction of selective laser melting. Mater Des2018; 160: 9–20.
62.
BartlettJLLiX. An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion. Additive Manuf2019; 27: 131–149.
63.
SimsonTEmmelADwarsA, et al.Residual stress measurements on AISI 316L samples manufactured by selective laser melting. Additive Manuf2017; 17: 183–189.
64.
LiuYYangYWangD. A study on the residual stress during selective laser melting (SLM) of metallic powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 87: 647–656.
65.
AkdulumAKayirY. Prediction of thrust force in indexable drilling of aluminum alloys with machine learning algorithms. Measurement (Mahwah NJ)2023; 222: 113655.
66.
UçarMKUcarZKöksalF, et al.Estimation of body fat percentage using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Measurement (Mahwah NJ)2021; 167: 108173.
67.
AkbariPOgokeFKaoN-Y, et al.MeltpoolNet: melt pool characteristic prediction in metal additive manufacturing using machine learning. Additive Manuf2022; 55: 102817.
68.
GuiYAoyagiKBianH, et al.Detection, classification and prediction of internal defects from surface morphology data of metal parts fabricated by powder bed fusion type additive manufacturing using an electron beam. Additive Manuf2022; 54: 102736.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
