Solar power is the primary thermal energy source from the sunlight. This research has carried out the study of solar aircraft with solar radiation in enhancing efficiency. The thermal transfer inside the solar aircraft wings using a nanofluid past a parabolic surface trough collector (PTSC) is investigated thoroughly. The source of heat is regarded as solar radiation. For several impacts, such as porous medium, thermal radiation, and varying heat conductivity, the heat transmission performance of the wings is examined. By using the tangent hyperbolic nanofluid (THNF), the entropy analysis has been performed. The modeled momentum and energy equations are managed using the well-established numerical methodology known as the finite difference method. Two distinct kinds of nano solid-particles have been examined, such as Copper (Cu) and Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), while Engine Oil (EO) being regarded as a based fluid. Different diagram parameters will be reviewed and revealed as figures and tables on speed, shear stress, temperature, and the surface drag coefficient and Nüselt number. It is observed that in terms of heat transfer for amplification of thermal radiation and changeable thermal conductance parameters, the performance of the aircraft wings raises. In contrast to traditional fluid, nanofluid is the best source of heat transmission. Cu-EO's thermal efficiency over ZrO2-EG falls to the minimum level of 12.6% and has reached a peak of 15.3%.
Al-SalemSAntelavaAConstantinouA,et al.A review on thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic solid waste (PSW). J Environ Manag2017; 197: 177–198.
2.
WeyMYLiouBHWuSY,et al.The autothermal pyrolysis of waste tires. J Air Waste Manage Assoc1995; 45: 855–863.
3.
BahramiMAbbaszadehP. An overview of renewable energies in Iran. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2013; 24: 198–208.
4.
GorjianSHashjinTTGhobadianB,et al.Modeling global solar radiation over Iran based on meteorological data using ANN technique. In: 11th Iranian Conference on Intelligent Systems (ICIS2013) (2013), pp. 1–8.
5.
HosseiniSJF. The role of solar energy in reducing pasture degradation in Iran: a case of carbon sequestration. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia2006; 6: 2004–2008.
6.
AlamdariPNematollahiOAlemrajabiAA. Solar energy potentials in Iran. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2013; 21: 778–788.
7.
AbediA. Preface. Energy Procedia2012; 14: 1.
8.
MemonSKatsuraTRadwanA,et al.Modern eminence and concise critique of solar thermal energy and vacuum insulation technologies for sustainable low-carbon infrastructure. International Journal of Solar Thermal Vacuum Engineering 2020; 1: 52–71.
9.
OlatomiwaL. Optimal configuration assessments of hybrid renewable power supply for rural healthcare facilities. Energy Reports2016; 2: 141–146.
10.
MadvarMDNazariMAArjmandJT,et al.Analysis of stakeholder roles and the challenges of solar energy utilization in Iran. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies2018; 13: 438–451.
11.
DengJO’DonovanTSTianZ,et al.Thermal performance predictions and tests of a novel type of flat plate solar thermal collectors by integrating with a freeze tolerance solution. Energy Convers Manage2019; 198: 111784.
12.
ShariahAMShialabiB. Optimal design for a thermosyphon solar flat plate water heater. Renewable Energy2013; 11: 351–361.
13.
SarkarJ. A critical review of heat transfer correlations of nanofluids. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2011; 15: 3271–3277.
14.
YuWXieH. A review on nanofluids: preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater 2012; 2012: 435873.
15.
ChoiCYooHSOhJM. Preparation and heat transfer properties of nanoparticle-in-transformer oil dispersions as advanced energy-efficient coolants. Curr Appl Phys2008; 8: 710–712.
16.
XuanYLiQ. Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow2000; 21: 58–64.
17.
BothaSSNdunguPBladergroenBJ. Physicochemical properties of oil-based nanofluids containing hybrid structures of silver nanoparticles supported on silica. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50: 3071–3077.
18.
HwangYLeeJKLeeCH,et al.Stability and thermal conductivity characteristics of nanofluids. Thermochim Acta2007; 455: 70–74.
19.
MurshedSMSTanSHNguyenNT. Temperature dependence of interfacial properties and viscosity of nanofluids for droplet-based microfluidics. Journal of Physics D2008; 41: 085502.
20.
MirzaeiniaAHassanalianMLeeK,et al.Energy conservation of V-shaped swarming fixed-wing drones through position reconfiguration. Aerospace Science and Technology2019; 94: 105398.
21.
MontalvoC. Meta aircraft flight dynamics and controls. PhD Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology (2014).
YangDSunBXuT,et al.Experimental and numerical study on the flow and heat transfer characteristic of nanofluid in the recirculation zone of backward-facing step microchannels. Appl Therm Eng2021; 199: 117527.
26.
AmaniMAmaniPBahiraeiM,et al.Latest developments in nanofluid flow and heat transfer between parallel surfaces: a critical review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2021; 294: 102450.
27.
WenTZhuGLuL. Experimental and artificial neural network based study on the heat transfer and flow performance of ZnO-EG/water nanofluid in a mini-channel with serrated fins. International Journal of Thermal Sciences2021; 170: 107149.
28.
AjeebWOliveiraMSAMartinsN,et al.Forced convection heat transfer of non-Newtonian MWCNTs nanofluids in microchannels under laminar flow. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer2021; 127: 105495.
29.
DemirkirCErturkH. Convective heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of graphene-water nanofluids in transitional flow. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer2012; 121: 105092.
30.
Abou-zeidMYOuafME. Hall currents effect on squeezing flow of non-Newtonian nanofluid through a porous medium between two parallel plates. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021; 28: 101362.
31.
JavaherdehKKarimiHKhojastehA. Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement of non-Newtonian nanofluid in porous blocks in a channel partially. Powder Technol2021; 383: 270–279.
32.
MahmelNHShekariYTayebiA. Three-dimensional analysis of forced convection of Newtonian and non-Newtonian nanofluid through a horizontal pipe using single- and two-phase models. International Communication in Heat and Mass Transfer2021; 121: 105119.
33.
PopIInghamDB. Convective heat transfer: mathematical and computational modelling of viscous fluids and porous Media. Pergamon: Amsterdam, 2001.
34.
KebedeTHaileEAwgichewG,et al.Heat and mass transfer analysis in unsteady flow of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid over a moving wedge with buoyancy and dissipation effects. Heliyon2020; 6: e03776.
35.
JamshedWNisarKSIbrahimRW, et al.Thermal expansion optimization in solar aircraft using tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid: a solar thermal application. Journal of Materials Research and Technology2021; 14: 985–1006.
36.
WaqasHKafaitAMuhammadT,et al.Numerical study for bio-convection flow of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid over a Riga plate with activation energy. Alexandria Eng J2021; In press.
37.
JamshedWNisarKSIsaSSPM,et al.Computational case study on tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow: single phase thermal investigation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021; 27: 101246.
38.
RamzanMGulHKadryS,et al.Role of bioconvection in a three dimensional tangent hyperbolic partially ionized magnetized nanofluid flow with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux and activation energy. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer2021; 120: 104994.
39.
LinYZhengLZhangX. Radiation effects on Marangoni convection flow and heat transfer in pseudo-plastic non-Newtonian nanofluids with variable thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2014; 27: 708–716.
40.
AfzalKAzizA. Transport and heat transfer of time dependent MHD slip flow of nanofluids in solar collectors with variable thermal conductivity and thermal radiation. Results Phys2016; 6: 746–753.
41.
HashimAHKhanM. Unsteady mixed convective flow of Williamson nanofluid with heat transfer in the presence of variable thermal conductivity and magnetic field. J Mol Liq2018; 260: 436–446.
42.
SongYWaqasHAl-KhaledK,et al.Bioconvection analysis for Sutterby nanofluid over an axially stretched cylinder with melting heat transfer and variable thermal features: a Marangoni and solutal model. Alexandria Eng J2021; 60: 4663–4675.
43.
KimGBaekSChoiW,et al.Stability, surface tension, and thermal conductivity of Al2O3/water nanofluids according to different types of alcohol and their proportion. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021; 28: 101385.
44.
LahmarSKezzarMEidMR, et al.Heat transfer of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow under the effects of an inclined magnetic field and variable thermal conductivity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications2020; 540: 123138.
45.
AzamMXuTKhanM. Numerical simulation for variable thermal properties and heat source/sink in flow of cross nanofluid over a moving cylinder. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer2020; 118: 104832.
46.
MahmoodAJamshedWAzizA. Entropy and heat transfer analysis using Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model for a boundary layer flow of Casson nanofluid. Results Phys2018; 10: 640–649.
47.
ShuklaNRanaPBegOA,et al.Homotopy study of magnetohydrodynamic mixed convection nanofluid multiple slip flow and heat transfer from a vertical cylinder with entropy generation. Propulsion and Power Research2019; 8: 147–162.
48.
KashyapDDassAK. Effect of boundary conditions on heat transfer and entropy generation during two-phase mixed convection hybrid Al2O3-Cu/water nanofluid flow in a cavity. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences2019; 157–158: 45–59.
49.
DengSLiMYangY,et al.Heat transfer and entropy generation in two layered electroosmotic flow of power-law nanofluids through a microtube. Appl Therm Eng2021; 196: 117314.
50.
MandalSShitGC. Entropy analysis on unsteady MHD biviscosity nanofluid flow with convective heat transfer in a permeable radiative stretchable rotating disk. Chinese Journal of Physics2021; 74: 239–255.
51.
MilesR.Bessaih, Heat transfer and entropy generation analysis of three-dimensional nanofluids flow in a cylindrical annulus filled with porous media. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 124 (2021), pp. 105240.
52.
ZaibAKhanUWakifA,et al.Numerical entropic analysis of mixed MHD convective flows from a Non-isothermal vertical flat plate for radiative tangent hyperbolic blood biofluids conveying magnetite ferroparticles: dual similarity solutions. Arabian Journal for science and engineering2020; 45: 5311–5330.
53.
AzizAJamshedWAzizT,et al.Entropy analysis of Powell- Eyring hybrid nanofluid including effect of linear thermal radiation and viscous dissipation. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 143: 1331–1343.
54.
BrewsterMQ. Thermal radiative transfer and features. John Wiley and Sons1992, pp. 445–456.
55.
ReddyNBPoornimaTSreenivasuluP. Influence of variable thermal conductivity on MHD boundary layer slip flow of ethylene-glycol based nanofluids over a stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. J Eng Math2014; 1: 905158.
56.
JamshedWAzizA. A comparative entropy based analysis of Cu and Fe3o4 /methanol Powell-Eyring nanofluid in solar thermal collectors subjected to thermal radiation variable thermal conductivity and impact of different nanoparticles shape. Result in Physics2018; 9: 195–205.
57.
JamshedWNisarKSIbrahimRW,et al.Computational frame work of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux effects on engine oil based Williamson hybrid nanofluids: a thermal case study. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021; 26: 101179.
58.
JamshedWAzizA. Cattaneo-Christov based study of Casson hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching surface with entropy generation. Appl Nanosci2018; 8: 685–698.
59.
JamshedWNisarKS. Computational single phase comparative study of Williamson Nnanofluid in parabolic trough solar collector via Keller box method. International Journal of Energy Research2021; 45(7): 10696–10718.
60.
KellerHB. New difference scheme for parabolic problems. Academic Press, New York1971; 2: 327–350.
61.
IshakANazarRPopI. Mixed convection on the stagnation point flow towards a vertical, continuously stretching sheet. ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer2007; 129: 1087–1090.
62.
IshakANazarRPopI. Boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching vertical surface. Meccanica2009; 44: 369–375.
63.
AbolbashariMHFreidoonimehrNNazariF,et al.Entropy analysis for an unsteady MHD flow past a stretching permeable surface in nanofluid. Powder Technol2014; 267: 256–267.
64.
DasSChakrabortySJanaRN,et al.Entropy analysis of unsteady magneto-nanofluid flow past accelerating stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics2015; 36: 1593–1610.
65.
JamshedWEidMRNisarKS, et al.A numerical frame work of magnetically driven Powell-Eyring nanofluid using single phase model. Sci Rep2021; 11: 16500.
66.
JamshedW. Thermal augmentation in solar aircraft using tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid: a solar energy application. Energy & Environment2021: 1–44.
67.
JamshedWNisar bKSIbrahimRW, et al.Thermal expansion optimization in solar aircraft using tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid: a solar thermal application. Journal of Materials Research and Technology2021; 14: 985–1006.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
