A systematic review of the literature on End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Batteries (EOLEVB) reuse is performed. The intent is to map the existing knowledge base and identify the ongoing and emerging issues. A total of 569 articles (2015–2024) from Web of Science and Scopus are analyzed, stylized by sub-periods, to capture the research evolution. The package VOS Viewer is used to conduct the bibliographic coupling and keyword co-occurrence analysis, to establish the core and sub-themes. The review identifies the techno-economic feasibility of EOLEVB for energy storage, degradation modelling, and state-of-health assessment as ongoing research themes. Circular economic perspectives such as material/substance flow, extended producer responsibility, and safety risk of EOLEVB are central to the research theme and deserve further attention. Scenario-based life cycle assessment and economic analysis of automated disassembly are peripheral and underexplored themes, while supply chain facility location and collection are regarded as more specialized and relatively isolated from the other major research themes. From the themes identified, the current challenges and research gaps are then synthesized by integrating the technical, economic, environmental, social and legal dimensions. The major technical gaps include a lack of standardized EOELVB assessment, battery management system development methods for second-life applications. Reprocessed EOLEVB market price uncertainty and the economic viability of automated disassembly require research attention. There also exist weak circular economic policies and limited attention to the social (safety, trust, consumer willingness to pay) and environmental (design for reuse) aspects. Among the reuse strategies, repurposing stationary energy storage received much attention.
WaghKDhatrakP. A review on powertrain subsystems and charging technology in battery electric vehicles: current and future trends. Proc Inst Mech. Eng Part D J. Automob Eng2022; 236: 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070211025906
2.
NgoyKRLukongVTYoroKO, et al. Lithium-ion batteries and the future of sustainable energy: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2025; 223: 115971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115971
3.
Al-AshehSAidanAAllawiT, et al. Treatment and recycling of spent lithium-based batteries: a review. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag2024; 26: 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01842-1
4.
DongQLiangSLiJ, et al. iScience Cost, energy, and carbon footprint benefits of second-life electric vehicle battery use. iScience2023; 26: 107195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107195
5.
AnandhGPrasannaVenkatesanSVenkatadriU, et al. Multi-objective meta-heuristics to optimize end-of-life laptop remanufacturing decisions under quality grading of returned parts. Soft Comput2024; 28: 9433–9454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-09690-3
6.
AnandhGPrasannaVenkatesanSGohM, et al. Optimising end-of-life laptop remanufacturing decisions using meta-heuristics. Int J Oper Res2025; 53: 525–555. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2025.147789
7.
ToorajipourRChirumallaKJohanssonG, et al. Implementing circular business models for the second-life battery of electric vehicles: challenges and enablers from an ecosystem perspective. Bus Strategy Environ2024; 33: 8637–8655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3941
8.
SumanDRajakS. Analysis of barriers to the implementation of circular economy in an Indian electric vehicle batteries manufacturer. Environ Dev Sustain2026; 28: 1949–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05055-w
9.
AnandhGVenkatesanSPDomnicS, et al. Remanufacturing of end-of-life laptop based on remaining useful life prediction and quality grading with random forest and cluster analysis. Int J Process Manag Benchmarking2024; 17: 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2024.138350
10.
AlamZGheewalaSH. Recharging the planet: The sustainability potential of second-life electric vehicle batteries. J Energy Storage2026; 144: 119720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.119720
11.
HanFGaoJCaoZ, et al. Unlocking second-life battery potential to mitigate lithium demand in China’s energy storage systems. J Energy Storage2026; 166: 122531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.122531
12.
LvJWuQYangY, et al. Lithium-ion battery repair system to improve energy storage performance based on dynamic strategy and hybrid topology. J Energy Storage2025; 138: 118581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.118581
13.
DuanKPangGGovindanK, et al. Blockchain integration for cost-effective EV battery remanufacturing in closed-loop supply chains. Int J Prod Res. Epub ahead of print 17 April 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2026.2659261
14.
SeikaJKubliM. Repurpose or recycle? Simulating end-of-life scenarios for electric vehicle batteries under the EU battery regulation. Sustain Prod Consum2024; 51: 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.023
15.
KristiningrumENurcahyoRMadsuhaAF, et al. Second life business model for electric vehicle batteries: Patterns, structures and future challenges. Sustain Futures2025; 10: 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101437
16.
ChizaryfardALapkoYTruccoP. Strategic closed-loop supply chain configuration in the transition towards the circular economy of EV batteries: an evolutionary analytical framework. Int J Logist Manag2023; 34: 142–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2021-0337
17.
KarthickA. Review on state of charge prediction of battery management system in electric vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob. Epub ahead of print October 9 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070251380931
18.
WeiL. How to facilitate the recycling of retired electric vehicle batteries in China? A policy simulation based on system dynamics. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag2025; 27: 3749–3761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02330-4
19.
Ahmadi NezhadAMTorabiSAGhasemiA. Designing a circular supply chain network for electric vehicle batteries: an improved robust possibilistic programming approach. Int J Prod Econ2026; 298: 110043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.110043
20.
LiZBiZXiongX, et al. End of life electric vehicle batteries in China to 2060 and related resource management implications. Commun Earth Environ. Epub ahead of print 27 April 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03555-3
21.
LeeHKimJ. Strategies for promoting consumer participation in the collection of retired electric vehicle batteries. J Environ Manage2025; 380: 124853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124853
22.
WuWLiMWuZ, et al. Incentive mechanism design for electric vehicle battery supply chain under information asymmetry and government intervention. Ind Manag Data Syst2025; 126: 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2024-1068
23.
WuW. Electric vehicle battery recycling strategy considering channel leadership under the carbon trading mechanism: cooperation, competition, or monopoly?Energy2025; 335: 138262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138262
24.
TsaoYCAiHTT. Remanufacturing electric vehicle battery supply chain under government subsidies and carbon trading: optimal pricing and return policy. Appl Energy2024; 375: 124063. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2024.124063
25.
WuWLiMYangY, et al. Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: manufacturer, retailer, or consumer. Transp Policy2025; 164: 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.035
26.
BräunigGHertelDThürerM. Towards recycling excellence: a systematic review of applied lean methods within the disassembly of electric vehicle battery systems. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag2025; 27: 4127–4142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02368-4
27.
SaxenaV. Enhancing EV battery lifecycle management: robotic disassembly, design for disassembly, and sustainable solutions. J Energy Storage2025; 119: 116368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.116368
28.
ZhuJMathewsIRenD, et al. End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries. Cell Rep Phys Sci2021; 2: 100537. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XCRP.2021.100537
29.
YiYFuALiY, et al. Battery recycling and coordination in information leakage prevention under blockchain technology in a new energy vehicles supply chain. Energy Econ2024; 139: 107862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107862
30.
CeltekSAKulSPolatAO, et al. A machine learning-based real-time remaining useful life estimation and fair pricing strategy for electric vehicle battery swapping stations. IEEE Access2025; 13: 62555–62566. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3554682
31.
KulkovIChirumallaKStefanI, et al. Business models for second life batteries: a comprehensive framework for selecting sustainable business options. J Eng Technol Manag2025; 76: 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101874
32.
RajagopalVPrasanna VenkatesanSGohM. decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: a review. Comput Ind Eng2017; 113: 646–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.043
33.
ÖztürkOKocamanRKanbachDK. How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal. Rev Manag Sci2024; 18: 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0
34.
NirmalDDNageswara ReddyKSinghSK. Application of fuzzy methods in green and sustainable supply chains: critical insights from a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking2023; 31: 1700–1748. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2022-0563
35.
AlbertsenLRichterJLPeckP, et al. Circular business models for electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries: an analysis of current practices of vehicle manufacturers and policies in the EU. Resour Conserv Recycl2021; 172: 105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105658
36.
SlatteryMDunnJKendallA. Charting the electric vehicle battery reuse and recycling network in North America. Waste Manag2024; 174: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.11.018
37.
VigneshSCheHSSelvarajJ, et al. Repurposing electric vehicle batteries: State of art and challenges from repurposer perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2025; 213: 115439. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2025.115439
38.
NeriAButturiMAGamberiniR. Sustainable management of electric vehicle battery remanufacturing: a systematic literature review and future directions. J Manuf Syst2024; 77: 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMSY.2024.10.006
39.
NazimMSElavarasanMR. Extending battery lifecycles: a holistic review of second-life lithium-ion technology in sustainable energy systems from assessment to emerging trends. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2026; 233: 116848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2026.116848
40.
IqbalHSarwarSKirliD, et al. A survey of second-life batteries based on techno-economic perspective and applications-based analysis. Carbon Neutrality2023; 2: 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-023-00049-5
41.
Al-AlawiMKCugleyJHassaninH. Techno-economic feasibility of retired electric-vehicle batteries repurpose/reuse in second-life applications: a systematic review. Energy Clim Change2022; 3: 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100086
42.
BasiaASimeu-AbaziZGascardE, et al. Review on State of Health estimation methodologies for lithium-ion batteries in the context of circular economy. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2021; 32: 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRPJ.2021.02.004
43.
HuaYLiuXZhouS, et al. Toward sustainable reuse of retired lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Resour Conserv Recycl2021; 168: 105249. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2020.105249
SreeragRSVenkatesanSP. Supply chain issues in small and medium retailing: a systematic review and future research agenda. Int J Manage Enterp Dev2022; 21: 198–225. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2022.122101
46.
ZahoorAKunRMaoG, et al. Urgent needs for second life using and recycling design of wasted electric vehicles (EVs) lithium-ion battery: a scientometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res2024; 31: 43152–43173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33979-3
47.
AnandhGPrasannaVenkatesanSGohM, et al. Reuse assessment of WEEE: systematic review of emerging themes and research directions. J Environ Manage2021; 287: 112335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112335
48.
CallonMCourtialJPLavilleF. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics1991; 22: 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
49.
TurmuziMAzmiSKertiyaniNMI. ChatGPT in school mathematics education: a systematic review of opportunities, challenges, and pedagogical implications. Teach Teach Educ2026; 170: 105286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105286
50.
KumpulainenMSeppänenM. Combining web of science and scopus datasets in citation-based literature study. Scientometrics2022; 127: 5613–5631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04475-7
51.
AyinaddisSG. Artificial intelligence adoption dynamics and knowledge in SMEs and large firms: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J Innov Knowl2025; 10: 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100682
52.
MeyerDEMehlmanDWReevesES, et al. Comparison study of overlap among 21 scientific databases in searching pesticide information. Online Rev1983; 7: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024120
53.
ŞtirbuSThirionPSchmitzS, et al. The utility of Google scholar when searching geographical literature: comparison with three commercial bibliographic databases. J Acad Libr2015; 41: 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2015.02.013
54.
PengPXieXClaramuntC, et al. Bibliometric analysis of maritime cybersecurity: research status, focus, and perspectives. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev2025; 195: 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRE.2025.103971
55.
RoySPrasanna VenkatesanSGohM. Healthcare services: a systematic review of patient-centric logistics issues using simulation. J Oper Res Soc2021; 72: 2342–2364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1790306
56.
WuDChenXLuX, et al. Identifying subfields by integrating journal co-citation, topic co-occurrence, and interlocking editorial relationships. J Inf Sci. Epub ahead of print December 10 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251388054
57.
WilliamsPKellyMARowettD, et al. Charting the landscape of presence in virtual reality research: a bibliometric review. Front Virtual Real2025; 6: 1691240. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1691240
van EckNJWaltmanL. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics2010; 84: 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
60.
BukarUASayeedMSAmoduOA, et al. Leveraging VOSviewer approach for mapping, visualisation, and interpretation of crisis data for disaster management and decision-making. Int J Inf Manage Data Insights2025; 5: 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JJIMEI.2024.100314
61.
AriaMCuccurulloCD’AnielloL, et al. Comparative science mapping: a novel conceptual structure analysis with metadata. Scientometrics2024; 129: 7055–7081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05161-6
CheYHuXLinX, et al. Health prognostics for lithium-ion batteries: mechanisms, methods, and prospects. Energy Environ Sci2023; 16: 338–371. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03019E
65.
KamathDArsenaultRKimHC, et al. Economic and environmental feasibility of second-life lithium-ion batteries as fast-charging energy storage. Environ Sci Technol2020; 54: 6878–6887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05883
66.
JiaoNEvansS. Business models for sustainability: the case of second-life electric vehicle batteries. Procedia CIRP2016; 40: 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.114
67.
WrålsenBPrieto-SandovalVMejia-VillaA, et al. Circular business models for lithium-ion batteries–Stakeholders, barriers, and drivers. J Clean Prod2021; 317: 128393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128393
68.
DhairiyasamyRGabirielDBunphengW, et al. A comprehensive analysis of India’s electric vehicle battery supply chain: barriers and solutions. Discover Sustain2024; 5: 361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00595-7
69.
Rufino JúniorCARiva SanseverinoEGalloP, et al. Towards a business model for second-life batteries: barriers, opportunities, uncertainties, and technologies. J Energy Chem2023; 78: 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.12.019
EkbergJSridharanNVKarimR, et al. State estimation and remaining useful life prediction for lithium-ion batteries. Cell Rep Phys Sci2025; 6: 102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102854
72.
ZhuHHuJYangY. Towards a circular supply chain for retired electric vehicle batteries: a systematic literature review. Int J Prod Econ2025; 282: 109556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109556
73.
MathewAHertelDBräunigG. Towards a green electromobility transition: an overview of existing algorithms and their suitability for automated disassembly of electric vehicle battery systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2025; 139: 3239–3255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-16150-1
74.
ArrietaLACCamachoPSPerezJM, et al. A prospective life cycle assessment of different battery technologies for mobility, including a second stationary application. J Energy Storage2026; 164: 121839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.121839
75.
ArsadSRHannanMAKerPJ, et al. Longevity of lithium-ion batteries in EV applications: techno-economic and environmental impact considerations toward sustainability. J Energy Storage2025; 131: 117551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.117551
76.
ZouQZhangSWangS, et al. A review on echelon utilization and cathode material recycling of retired power batteries: recovery efficiency and carbon emission reduction benefits. Appl Energy2026; 415: 127859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127859
77.
NeigumKWangZ. Technology, economic, and environmental analysis of second-life batteries as stationary energy storage: a review. J Energy Storage2024; 103: 114393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.114393
78.
ChirumallaKKulkovIParidaV, et al. Enabling battery circularity: unlocking circular business model archetypes and collaboration forms in the electric vehicle battery ecosystem. Technol Forecast Soc Change2024; 199: 123044. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2023.123044
79.
KaarlelaTVillagrossiERastegarpanahA, et al. Robotised disassembly of electric vehicle batteries: a systematic literature review. J Manuf Syst2024; 74: 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.05.013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
