Dynamic modelling and fuzzy adaptive fast integral terminal sliding mode control of armed vehicle system under the influence of standardized road disturbances
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Dynamic modelling and fuzzy adaptive fast integral terminal sliding mode control of armed vehicle system under the influence of standardized road disturbances
This paper proposed the mathematical modelling of multi-body non-linear dynamics of an armed vehicle with weapons, designing several sliding mode-based controllers, including the fuzzy logic-based adaptive controller, against the external effects of standard road disturbance, and comparatively investigating the performances of the controllers. Firstly, the physical and dynamic design parameters of the system are determined as military standards, the equations of motion of the system are derived, and a multi-degree-of-freedom vehicle with a weapon dynamics model is obtained. Later, to ensure stable and robust control of the system under disturbances and uncertainties, the conventional sliding mode controllers with different sliding surfaces are developed alongside the fuzzy adaptive fast integral terminal sliding mode controller, whose parameters are adjusted based on the angular position error. Multiple standardized military road profile data are applied as external disturbances, and the simulation studies are performed to achieve high-precision control of the weapon’s elevation and azimuth angles by considering the limitations of system parameters and standards. Unlike most existing, this study addresses an adaptive framework that integrates fuzzy logic into a fast integral terminal sliding mode control that has received limited use in vehicle systems by considering a full multibody vehicle model with realistic military parameters and road profiles. The comparative simulation results on the system demonstrate that the proposed controller ensures superior robustness performance with fast convergence and better tracking by not requiring parameter reconfiguration.
ChenYXieMZouX, et al. Development and challenges of nonlinear dynamic modeling and stabilization control of mobile firing guns. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2024; 239(7): 2242.
2.
Dos Santos GomesMFerreiraAM. Gun-turret modelling and control. In: Proceedings of Cobem 2005 – 18th international congress of mechanical engineering, Ouro Preto, Brazil, 6–11 November 2005, pp.60–67. Amsterdam: ABCM.
3.
MorangueiraYLACarlosJde Carvalho PereiraJC. The PID and LQR active control assessment in a smart automotive suspension system with a full car model. Dyn Contin Discrete Impuls Syst Ser A Math Anal2024; 31: 287–320.
4.
KumarSMedhaviAKumarR, et al. Modeling, analysis and PID controller implementation on suspension system for quarter vehicle model. J Mech Eng Sci2022; 16(2): 8905–8916.
5.
KrzysztofikI. The dynamics of the controlled observation and tracking head located on a moving vehicle. Solid State Phenom2012; 180: 313–322.
6.
BanerjeeSBalamuruganVKumarKR. Effect of integrated ride and cornering dynamics of a military vehicle on the weapon responses. Proc Inst Mech Eng K J Multi-body Dyn2018; 232(4): 536–554.
7.
CakirMFSezerSBayraktarM. Modelling and simulation of elevation dynamics of main battle tank weapon system with linear graph method. Arab J Sci Eng2024; 49: 1–10.
8.
ShuklaJ. Modelling and simulation of main battle tank to stabilize the weapon control system. SAE technical paper series 2018-28-0078, 2018.
9.
BanerjeeSBalamuruganVKumarKR. Vibration control of a military vehicle weapon platform under the influence of integrated ride and cornering dynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng K J Multi-body Dyn2021; 235(2): 197–216.
10.
HudhaKJamaluddinHSaminMP. Disturbance rejection control of a light armoured vehicle using stability augmentation based active suspension system. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2008; 15: 152–169.
11.
KrzysztofikIKorubaZ. Adaptive control of anti-aircraft missile launcher mounted on a mobile base. Theor Appl Mech Lett2012; 2(4): 043008.
12.
HosseinlooAHNaderVFookFY. Performance of spade-less wheeled military vehicles with passive and semi-active suspensions during mortar firing. Veh Syst Dyn2012; 50(10): 1515–1537.
13.
TrikandeMWKarveNKAnandRR, et al. Semi-active vibration control of an 8 × 8 armored wheeled platform. J Vib Control2018; 24(2): 283–302.
14.
ZhouGKimHSChoiYJ. A new method of identification of equivalent suspension and damping rates of full-vehicle model. Veh Syst Dyn2019; 57(11): 1573–1600.
15.
KumarSAnithaG. A novel self-tuning fuzzy logic-based PID controllers for two-axis gimbal stabilization in a missile seeker. Int J Aerosp Eng2021; 2021(5): 1–12.
16.
LiCYangGWangX, et al. Adaptive robust target tracking control of marching tank under high-speed maneuvering condition. J Mech Sci Technol2022; 36(6): 2787–2798.
17.
LiGXuHRuanZ, et al. Design and performance evaluation of a novel fractional-order PID control strategy for vehicle semi-active suspension. Adv Mech Eng2024; 16(4): 22–35.
18.
NguyenTA. A novel approach with a fuzzy sliding mode proportional integral control algorithm tuned by fuzzy method. Sci Rep2023; 13: 7327.
19.
AbrouguiHNejimSDallagiH. Modeling and control of a remote control weapon station. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on advanced systems and emergent technologies, Hammamet, Tunisia, 23 July 2024, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
20.
ZhangJHeQLiH, et al. Disturbance observer-based dynamic fuzzy sliding-mode control strategy for horizontal vibration of high-speed elevator car system. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng2024; 240(2): 2061–2076.
21.
HouHYuXXuL, et al. Finite-time continuous terminal sliding mode control of servo motor systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2019; 67(7): 5647–5656.
22.
AliKCaoZRsetamK, et al. Practical adaptive fast terminal sliding mode control for servo motors. Actuators2023; 12(12): 433.
23.
ZhengYCaoZRsetamK, et al. Extreme learning machine-based super-twisting integral terminal sliding mode speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motors. IET Control Theory Appl2024; 18(18): 2524–2539.
24.
RsetamKZhenweiCZhihongM. Design of robust terminal sliding mode control for underactuated flexible joint robot. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2021; 52(7): 4272–4285.
25.
HassanMACaoZRsetamK, et al. Fast integral terminal synchronous sliding mode control for pantograph robots. ISA Trans2025; 169: 179–193.
26.
ZeghlacheSGhellabMZDjeriouiA, et al. Adaptive fuzzy fast terminal sliding mode control for inverted pendulum-cart system with actuator faults. Math Comput Simul2023; 210: 207–234.
27.
QiaoLZhangW. Trajectory tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicles via adaptive fast nonsingular integral terminal sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Industr Inform2019; 16(2): 1248–1258.
28.
SuXYangXXuY. Fuzzy adaptive terminal sliding mode control based on recurrent neural network compensation for a maglev system. Eng Appl Artif Intell2023; 124: 106588.
29.
HuangKXiaWShaoK, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control for vehicle active anti-roll system based on property adjustable barrier function. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2024; 5: 3124–3133.
30.
LiZZuoLLuhrsG, et al. Electromagnetic energy-harvesting shock absorbers: design, modeling, and road tests. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2013; 62(3): 1065–1074.
31.
LiDZhaoYLinF, et al. Adaptive backstepping fast terminal sliding mode control for nonlinear uncertain active suspension system with mechanical elastic wheel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2025; 47: 87.
32.
MohsenMEltaherHSharafAM, et al. Optimal design of passive suspension system of a 6 × 6 multi-wheeled all-terrain vehicle using genetic algorithm. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2018; 25(3/4): 508–533.
33.
XiaYFuMLiC, et al. Active disturbance rejection control for active suspension system of tracked vehicles with gun. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2018; 65(5): 4051–4060.
34.
AparowVRHudhaKHamdanMM, et al. Study on dynamic performance of armoured vehicle in lateral direction due to firing impact. Adv Mil Technol2015; 10(2): 35–46.
35.
IkhwanMHIHudhaKKadirZA, et al. Skyhook control for 7-DOF ride model of armored vehicle due to road disturbance. In: Proceedings of the Asian control conference, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 10 September 2015, pp.1–5. New York: IEEE.
36.
JakatiABanerjeeSJebarajC. Development of mathematical models simulating vibration control of tracked vehicle weapon dynamics. Def Sci J2017; 67(4): 465.
37.
KimJYimS. Design of static output feedback suspension controllers for ride comfort improvement and motion sickness reduction. Processes2024; 12(5): 968.
38.
ZhangNZhaoQHuangS. Optimal sliding mode hierarchical decoupled control of vehicle semi-active suspension. Veh Syst Dyn2024; 63(11): 2086–2116.
39.
AbdoMValiARToloeiA, et al. Research on the cross-coupling of a two axes gimbal system with dynamic unbalance. Int J Adv Robot Syst2013; 10(10): 1.
40.
SmithWZhangN. Experimental and theoretical investigation into the dynamics of a half-car with an interconnected passive suspension. SAE technical paper series 2009-01-0579, 2009.
41.
ISO 8608. Mechanical vibration – road surface profiles – reporting of measured data. International Organization for Standardization, 1995.
42.
LetherwoodMJayakumarPGerthR, et al. Cooperative demonstration of technology for next-generation NATO reference mobility model. NATO Science and Technology Organization, 2020.
43.
YesilyurtHYAkalinO. Ride dynamics of an off-road vehicle with hydropneumatic suspension system. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Automotive Technologies Congress (OTEKON 2018), Bursa, Turkey, 7–8 May 2018, pp. 418–428.
44.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. AVTP 03-90 gradients and side-slopes. Military Agency for Standardization, 1992.
45.
BoraseRPMaghadeDKSondkarSY, et al. A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications. Int J Dyn Control2021; 9(2): 818–827.
46.
MobayenS. Fast terminal sliding mode controller design for nonlinear second-order systems with time-varying uncertainties. Complexity2015; 21(2): 239–244.
47.
UtkinVPoznyakAOrlovY, et al. Conventional and high-order sliding mode control. J Frankl Inst2020; 357(15): 10244–10261.
48.
UtkinVGuldnerJShiJ. Sliding mode control in electromechanical systems. 2th ed. CRC Press, 2017.
49.
SuleimanHUMurazuMBZarmaTA, et al. Methods of chattering reduction in sliding mode control: a case study of ball and plate system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on adaptive science and technology, Accra, Ghana, 22–24 August 2018, pp.1–8. New York: IEEE.
50.
UtkinV. Sliding mode control in mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on industrial electronics, Bologna, Italy, 5–9 September 1994, vol. 3, pp.1429–1431. New York: IEEE.
51.
RudermanM. Design and application of energy-saving sub-optimal sliding mode control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05918. 2025.
52.
TrivediPKBandyopadhyayB. Non-unique equivalent control in sliding mode with linear surfaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on power, control and embedded systems, Allahabad, India, 29 November–1 December 2010, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
53.
Yiğitİ.Model-free sliding mode stabilizing control of a real rotary inverted pendulum. J Vib Control2017; 23(10): 1645–1662.
54.
YuXFengYManZ. Terminal sliding mode control: an overview. IEEE Open J Ind Electron Soc2020; 2: 36–52.
55.
FangQMaoPShenL, et al. A global fast terminal sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of unmanned aerial manipulation. Meas Control2023; 56(3/4): 763–776.
56.
PalPBeheraRKSharmaR. Fast integral terminal sliding mode control based current sensorless scheme of dual active bridge converter. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2025; 61(4): 6593–6604.
57.
MahmoudMSAlyazidiNMAbouheafMI. Adaptive intelligent techniques for microgrid control systems: a survey. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst2017; 90: 292–305.
58.
Al-MahturiASantosoFGarrattMA, et al. Robust self-adaptive interval type-2 Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy logic for controlling MIMO nonlinear uncertain dynamical systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2022; 52(1): 655–666.
59.
NguyenTA. Research on the sliding mode–PID control algorithm tuned by fuzzy method for vehicle active suspension. Forces Mech2023; 11: 54–68.
60.
ChuZXiangXZhuD, et al. Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode diving control for autonomous underwater vehicle with input constraint. Int J Fuzzy Syst2018; 20(5): 1460–1469.
