Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study addresses the critical need to understand vibration exposure among motor-scooter riders, particularly those engaged in commuting, household errands, and delivery services where prolonged riding is common. The research focuses on evaluating riders’ exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV) and hand-arm vibration (HAV). Motor-scooter riders are frequently subjected to varying levels of whole-body vibration (WBV). This exposure can lead to musculoskeletal issues, including tissue and ligament strain, as well as chronic conditions such as lower back pain. The study involved seven healthy male motorcyclists aged 21–28 years, with varying body weights. Vibrations were measured at riding speeds of 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 km/h, and analyzed in accordance with ISO 2631 and ISO 5349 standards. Results indicated that the WBV levels exceeded the caution zones defined by ISO 2631, while the HAV levels remained within the safety limits specified in ISO 5349. Vibration exposure varied significantly with rider weight and speed. Heavier riders experienced higher levels of vibration, and an increase in riding speed led to elevated vibration magnitudes. These findings suggest that frequent motor-scooter riders are at potential risk for vibration-induced health issues. Therefore, optimizing scooter design and promoting vibration-minimizing riding practices are essential for improving rider safety and health.

Keywords

vibration exposure motor scooter riders whole-body vibration hand-arm vibration safety standards

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nigam

Malik

. A study on a vibratory model of a human body. J Biomech Eng 1987; 109: 148–153.

Kim

Yoon

. Development of a biomechanical model of the human body in a sitting posture with vibration transmissibility in the vertical direction. Int J Ind Ergon 2005; 35: 817–829.

Kauraw

Chaupal

Rajendran

. Vibration analysis of human body under seating posture: an automobile application. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2023; 45: 200.

Singh

Nigam

Saran

. Modal analysis of human body vibration model for Indian subjects under sitting posture. Ergonomics 2015; 58(7): 1117–1132.

Gupta

. Modal damping ratio and optimal elastic moduli of human body segments for anthropometric vibratory model of standing subjects. J Biomech Eng 2017; 139: 101006-1–101006-13.

Govindan

Saran

Harsha

. Biodynamic response analysis of semi-supine human under varying vertical excitations. Int J Ind Ergon 2021; 85: 103195.

Bharadwaj

Prakash

. Modal and harmonic analyses of the Indian male human body subject under semi-supine posture. Mater Today Proc 2021; 46: 10085–10092.

Kumar

Singh

Kalsi

. Response of human subjects using different biodynamic CAD models. Mater Today Proc 2020; 33: 1620–1625.

Zheng

Qiu

Griffin

. An analytic model of the in-line and cross-axis apparent mass of the seated human body exposed to vertical vibration with and without a backrest. J Sound Vib 2011; 330: 6509–6525.

10.

Mansfield

Griffin

. Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. J Biomech Eng 2000; 33: 933–941.

11.

Nawayseh

Griffin

. Non-linear dual-axis biodynamic response to fore-and-aft wholebody vibration. J Sound Vib 2005; 282: 831–862.

12.

Dong

, et al. Effect of sitting posture and seat on biodynamic responses of internal human body simulated by finite element modeling of body–seat system. J Sound Vib 2019; 438: 543–554.

13.

Gao

Zhang

, et al. Finite element modelling and biodynamic response prediction of the seated human body exposed to whole-body vibration. Ergonomics 2023; 66(12): 1854–1867.

14.

Amiri

Naserkhaki

Parnianpour

. Effect of whole-body vibration and sitting configurations on lumbar spinal loads of vehicle occupants. Comput Biol Med 2019; 107: 292–301.

15.

Coyte

Stirling

, et al. Seated whole-body vibration analysis, technologies, and modeling: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2016; 46(6): 725–739.

16.

Dong

Guo

. Human body modeling method to simulate the biodynamic characteristics of spine in vivo with different sitting postures. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2017; 33(11): e2876.

17.

Dreischarf

Zander

Shirazi-Adl

, et al. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. J Biomech 2014; 47: 1757–1766.

18.

Yang

Lieberman

, et al. Stress distribution in vertebral bone and pedicle screw and screw–bone load transfers among various fixation methods for lumbar spine surgical alignment: a finite element study. Med Eng Phys 2019; 63: 26–32.

19.

Wang

Rakheja

Boileau

. Relationship between measured apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility responses of seated occupants exposed to vertical vibration. J Sound Vib 2008; 314: 907–922.

20.

Savage

Billing

Furnell

, et al. Whole body vibration and occupational physical performance: a review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016; 89: 181–197.

21.

Nawayseh

Al Sinan

Alteneiji

, et al. Effect of gender on the biodynamic responses to vibration induced by a whole-body vibration training machine. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H: J Eng Med 2019; 233(3): 383–392.

22.

Suresh

Kumbhakar

Oraon

, et al. Assessment of exposure to vibration of two-wheeler rider. In: Singh

Bhardwaj

Iqbal

, et al. (eds) Productivity with health, safety, and environment. Springer, 2022, pp. 391–399.

23.

Cossalter

Brendelson

Sadauckas

, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of passive rider effects on motorcycle weave. Veh Syst Dyn 2012; 50(1): 215–227.

24.

Sinha

Bajaj

. Vibration analysis of Hero Honda vehicle. Int J Mech Prod Eng 2014; 2(2): 30–35.

25.

Jamali

Masamura

Inaba

, et al. Assessment of hand-arm vibration exposure among traffic police motorcyclists. J Arch Occup Environ Health 1997; 70: 22–28.

26.

Soh

Ishida

Ushijima

, et al. Do motorcyclists have erectile dysfunction? A preliminary study. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 396–399.

27.

Tominaga

. Vibration exposure and symptoms in postal carriers using motorbikes. J Med Sci 1994; 57: 235–239.

28.

Layne

McFarlin

Hinman

, et al. Vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during whole-body vibration training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39(10): 1794–1800.

29.

Knez

Slavič

Boltezar

. A multi-axis biodynamic measuring handle for a human hand–arm system. J Mech Eng 2013; 59(2): 71–80.

30.

Wang

Rakheja

Boileau

P-E

. Effects of sitting postures on biodynamic response of seated occupants under vertical vibration. Int J Ind Ergon 2004; 34: 289–306.

31.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2631-1:1997 – mechanical vibration and shock. Part 1: general requirements. ISO, 1997.

32.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5349-1:1997 – mechanical vibration and shock. Part 1: general requirements. ISO, 1997.

Experimental and numerical evaluation of whole-body and hand-arm vibration exposure in motor-scooter riders

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References