With the widespread adoption of autonomous driving technology, speed decision-making, and vehicle control have become critical components in this field. This paper examines personalized speed planning and control for vehicles traveling over various road surfaces, with a specific focus on vehicles equipped with passive suspension systems. First, this paper conducted sensitivity experiments on uneven road surfaces to filter out those surfaces that exert a certain influence on vehicle vertical ride comfort. Secondly, this paper proposes a personalized speed control decision framework tailored for autonomous vehicles traversing uneven road surfaces. Based on this framework, a speed decision planning system was designed. Finally, simulation analysis validated the innovation and advantages of this framework.
ArmingolJMde la EscaleraAHilarioC, et al. IVVI: intelligent vehicle based on visual information. Robot Auton Syst2007; 55: 904–916.
3.
ChunjieZYongguiLFeiL. A switched control strategy of heterogeneous vehicle platoon for multiple objectives with state constraints. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 20(5): 1883–1896.
4.
TangXDuanZHuX, et al. Improving ride comfort and fuel economy of connected hybrid electric vehicles based on traffic signals and real road information. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2021; 70(4): 3101–3112.
5.
ShenPZhaoZGuoQ, et al. Development of economic velocity planning algorithm for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 23(6): 5501–5513.
6.
HangPLvCXingY, et al. Human-like decision making for autonomous driving: a noncooperative game theoretic approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 22(4): 2076–2087.
7.
LindorferMMecklenbraukerCFOstermayerG. Modeling the imperfect driver: incorporating human factors in a microscopic traffic model. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 19(9): 2856–2870.
8.
ZhuBJiangYZhaoJ, et al. Typical-driving-style-oriented personalized adaptive cruise control design based on human driving data. Transp Res C Emerg Technol2019; 100: 274–288.
9.
DuHYim SzeKLamJ. Semi-active H∞ control of vehicle suspension with magneto-rheological dampers. J Sound Vib2005; 283: 981–996.
10.
LuZWeiYQinH, et al. In: 2024 4th International conference on artificial intelligence, robotics, and communication (ICAIRC). DOI: 10.1109/ICAIRC64177.2024.10900290.
11.
LeDLiuZJinJ, et al. Historical improvement optimal motion planning with model predictive trajectory optimization for on-road autonomous vehicle. IEEE, 2019. DOI:10.1109/IECON.2019.8927189.
12.
DuYChenJZhaoC, et al. Comfortable and energy-efficient speed control of autonomous vehicles on rough pavements using deep reinforcement learning. Transp Res C Emerg Technol2022; 134: 103489.
13.
HartmannGShillerZAzariaA. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Time Optimal Velocity Control using Prior Knowledge. IEEE, 2020. DOI:10.1109/ICTAI.2019.00034.
14.
ChenTGuestrinC. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. ACM, 2016. DOI:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
15.
AlghamdiAAAljassirAZAlmuaybidRO, et al. Photon effective dose prediction using XGBoost: a machine learning approach for radiological protection. Radiat Phys Chem2025; 229: 112552.
16.
ChengTYaoCDuanJ, et al. Prediction of active length of pipes and tunnels under normal faulting with XGBoost integrating a complexity-performance balanced optimization approach. Comput Geotech2025; 179: 107048.
17.
BushenkovaASoaresPMMJohannsenF, et al. Towards an improved representation of the urban heat island effect: a multi-scale application of XGBoost for Madrid. Urban Clim2024; 55: 32–42.
18.
WuJZhouHLiuZ, et al. Ride comfort optimization via speed planning and preview semi-active suspension control for autonomous vehicles on uneven roads. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2020; 69(8): 8343–8355.
19.
Australia S. Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. 1997.
20.
LillicrapTPHuntJJPritzelA, et al. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. Computer ence, 2015. DOI:10.1016/S1098-3015(10)67722-4.
21.
ShiYHEberhartRC. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. IEEE, 2002. DOI:10.1109/CEC.1999.785511.
22.
WangTCChenYH. Incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations under uncertain environments. Inf Fusion2010; 11: 201–207.
23.
HuangCHuangHHangP, et al. Personalized trajectory planning and control of lane-change maneuvers for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2021; 70(6): 5511–5523.
24.
WangHJinYSunC, et al. Offline data-driven evolutionary optimization using selective surrogate ensembles. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2018; 23: 203–216.
25.
PatwaryMJACaoWWangX-Z, et al. Fuzziness based semi-supervised multimodal learning for patient’s activity recognition using RGBDT videos. Appl Soft Comput2022; 120: 108655.
26.
JinZHeDMaR, et al. Fault diagnosis of train rotating parts based on multi-objective VMD optimization and ensemble learning. Digit Signal Process2021; 121: 103312.
27.
YanWYuankaiG. Application of improved XGBoost model in stock forecasting. Comput Eng Appl2019; 55(20): 6.
28.
JiangSMaoHDingZ, et al. Deep decision tree transfer boosting. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2019; 31(2): 383–395.
29.
MaturoFVerdeR. Pooling random forest and functional data analysis for biomedical signals supervised classification: theory and application to electrocardiogram data. Stat Med2022; 41: 2247–2275.
30.
GuoYLuYQuJ, et al. MDSFE: multiscale deep stacking fusion enhancer network for visual data enhancement. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2022; 72: 1–12.
31.
GuoYDingHShangGuanX. An XGBoost approach to detect driver visual distraction based on vehicle dynamics. Traffic Inj Prev2023; 24(6): 458–465.
32.
MayneDQRawlingsJBRaoCV, et al. Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica2000; 36(6): 789–814.
33.
QinSJBadgwellTA. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng Pract2003; 11(7): 733–764.
34.
SimorghARazminiaAMarashianA. Adaptive velocity control of an autonomous vehicle using input-error model reference approach. J Franklin Inst2024; 361(6): 106700.
35.
WatanabeMSakaiK. Identifying tractor overturning scenarios using a driving simulator with a motion system. Biosyst Eng2021; 210: 261–270.
