Reconfigurable transport vehicles, capable of dynamically altering their configurations through the assembly and disassembly of reconfiguration units (RUs), can adapt to diverse environmental conditions and evolving task requirements. This paper introduces a novel reconfigurable unmanned shuttle (RUS) that achieves vehicle reconfiguration via a six-DoF parallel docking mechanism (PDM), thereby enhancing transport capacity. To enable mechanical docking using the PDM, this paper proposes a four-phase autonomous docking process (4P-ADP) framework, consisting of the far-end approach phase (FEAP), near-end capture phase (NECP), collaborative docking phase (CDP), and host establishment phase (HEP). Focusing on the NECP, the most critical phase, an optimal docking path planning and tracking (ODPPT) method is proposed. First, a kinematic model is used to compute the pose envelope of the docking mechanism (PEDM). From this, a set of endpoint samples is generated to form a path cluster. The optimal path is then selected and tracked using linear time-varying model predictive control (LTV–MPC). Finally, the proposed methods are validated through 27 experimental trials on the RUS test platform, with all path tracking endpoints satisfying the PEDM, thereby confirming the effectiveness of the ODPPT method.
HillLBarnhartDFowlerE, et al. The Market for Satellite Cellularization: a historical view of the impact of the satlet morphology on the space industry. AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition. DOI: 0.2514/6.2013-5486.
2.
HelvajianH. HIVE: a new architecture for space, vol. PM347. SPIE, pp. 771–809.
3.
KortmannMSchervanTASchmidtH, et al. Building block-based “iboss” approach: fully modular systems with standard interface to enhance future satellites. In: 66nd International astronautical congress, 2015.
4.
PattersonMDQuinlanJFredericksWJ, et al. A modular unmanned aerial system for missions requiring distributed aerial presence or payload delivery. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-0210.
RognaasGXuJLindsethS, et al. Mobile offshore base concepts. concrete hull and steel topsides. Mar Struct2001; 14(1): 5–23.
7.
WatanabeEUtsunomiyaTWangC.Hydroelastic analysis of pontoon-type VLFS: a literature survey. Eng Struct2004; 26(2): 245–256.
8.
PaulosJEckensteinNTosunT, et al. Automated self-assembly of large maritime structures by a team of robotic boats. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2015; 12(3): 958–968.
9.
MateosLAWangWGhenetiB, et al. Autonomous latching system for robotic boats. In: 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). pp. 7933–7939. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793525.
10.
RitzSGolzMBoeckF, et al. Large modifiable underwater mothership: a case study for ocean bottom nodes deployment and recovery. SPE Offshore Europe Conference and Exhibition, 2019, p. D031S013R001. https://doi.org/10.2118/195776-MS
11.
WuJKulcsárBSelpi, et al. A modular, adaptive, and autonomous transit system (MAATS): an in-motion transfer strategy and performance evaluation in urban grid transit networks. Transp Res A Policy Pract2021; 151: 81–98.
12.
GuoRGuanWVallatiM, et al. Modular autonomous electric vehicle scheduling for customized on-demand bus services. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2023; 24(9): 10055–10066.
13.
KhanZSHeWMenéndezM.Application of modular vehicle technology to mitigate bus bunching. Transp Res C Emerg Technol2023; 146: 103953.
14.
CenHNiJLuoY, et al. Optimization-based trajectory planning for reconfigurable unmanned vehicle units with multi-steering modes during the reconfiguration process. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2024; 239(1): 12–32.
15.
MaMNiJCenH, et al. Research on the path planning integrated with multi-steer modes for heavy reconfigurable unit. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2024; 239(9): 241.
16.
YangXNiJ.The energy management strategy of the multi-source parallel power system for the self-reconfigurable ground vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2024; 239(7): 466.
17.
HerreroDVillagráJMartínezH.Self-configuration of waypoints for docking maneuvers of flexible automated guided vehicles. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2013; 10(2): 470–475.
18.
WalterMRAntoneMChuangsuwanichE, et al. A situationally aware voice-commandable robotic forklift working alongside people in unstructured outdoor environments. J Field Robot2015; 32(4): 590–628.
19.
SunCKingryNDaiR.A unified formulation and nonconvex optimization method for mixed-type decision-making of robotic systems. IEEE Trans Robot2021; 37(3): 831–846.
20.
LashkariNBiglarbegianMYangSX.Development of a novel robust control method for formation of heterogeneous multiple mobile robots with autonomous docking capability. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2020; 17(4): 1759–1776.
21.
YadegarMKashiZGhaderiH, et al. Autonomous target docking with obstacle avoidance and final velocity control for non-holonomic mobile robots. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2025; 22: 4039–4050.
22.
LowEMPManchesterIRSavkinAV. A biologically inspired method for vision-based docking of wheeled mobile robots. Robot Auton Syst2007; 55(10): 769–784.
23.
MiljkovićZVukovićNMitićM, et al. New hybrid vision-based control approach for automated guided vehicles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2013; 66(1–4): 231–249.
24.
WalterMRKaramanSFrazzoliE, et al. Closed-loop pallet manipulation in unstructured environments. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2010, pp. 5119–5126.
25.
SongGWangHZhangJ, et al. Automatic docking system for recharging home surveillance robots. IEEE Trans Consum Electron2011; 57(2): 428–435.
26.
WangSYeAGuoH, et al. Autonomous pallet localization and picking for industrial forklifts based on the line structured light. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, 2016, pp. 707–713.
27.
SeelingerMYoderJD.Automatic visual guidance of a forklift engaging a pallet. Robot Auton Syst2006; 54(12): 1026–1038.
28.
WangYShanMYueY, et al. Autonomous target docking of nonholonomic mobile robots using relative pose measurements. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2021; 68(8): 7233–7243.
29.
GongLWuYGaoB, et al. Real-time dynamic planning and tracking control of auto-docking for efficient wireless charging. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2023; 8(3): 2123–2134.
30.
YangXNiJ.A cloud-edge combined control system with MPC parameter optimization for path tracking of unmanned ground vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2023; 237(1): 48–60.
31.
WangXDengZPengH, et al. Autonomous docking trajectory optimization for unmanned surface vehicle: a hierarchical method. Ocean Eng2023; 279: 114156.
