How to enhance driving safety and traffic efficiency while achieve the balancing between them remains a fundamental question in designing car-following control strategy. In this work, an interval-based safety distance model and a coordinated optimization framework for car-following behavior are presented. First, to improve driving safety, three typical uncertain factors are analyzed, and a car-following safety distance model that considers these factors is established using interval mathematics. Then, an optimal control framework for car-following behavior is constructed. By integrating the safety distance model with the car-following control model, a balanced control that can enhance both safety and efficiency is achieved. Additionally, to improve comfort and safety during car-following, two car-following control strategies are developed: (1) a dual-mode switching control strategy and (2) a near-optimal feedback control strategy. Finally, to improve computational efficiency, we introduce a novel numerical optimization method that combines a local-global adaptive solving strategy with a node-recycling mechanism. The effectiveness of the proposed control methods is validated through numerical simulations.
ZhangXJiangYLuY, et al. Receding-horizon reinforcement learning approach for kinodynamic motion planning of autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2022; 7(3): 556–568.
2.
ZhangDLiuHJiaoX, et al. MPC-based trajectory tracking control strategy incorporating autonomous lane-changing mechanism for intelligent vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 8th CAA international conference on vehicular control and intelligence (CVCI), Chongqing, China, 25–27 October 2024, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
3.
DuGZouYZhangX, et al. Motion control of autonomous vehicle with domain-centralized electronic and electrical architecture based on predictive reinforcement learning control method. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), Jeju Island, Korea, 2–5 June 2024, pp.1409–1416. New York: IEEE.
XuTWuKJiQ, et al. Modeling car-following behavior along a discrete time sequence and its applications in mixed traffic flow analysis. IFAC Pap OnLine2023; 56(2): 10485–10490.
6.
MengDSongGWuY, et al. Modification of Newell’s car-following model incorporating multidimensional stochastic parameters for emission estimation. Transp Res D Transp Environ2021; 91: 102692.
7.
YinJLiZCaoP. Systematic review on classical car-following models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 7th international conference on intelligent transportation engineering (ICITE), Beijing, China, 11–13 November 2022, pp.40–45. New York: IEEE.
8.
SongHQuDHuC, et al. Psychological field effect analysis and car-following behavior modeling based on driving style. Int J Automot Technol2024; 25: 1065–1076.
9.
YaoSZhouYFriedrichB, et al. Planning trajectories for connected and automated vehicle platoon on curved roads: a two-dimensional cooperative approach. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2024; 165: 104718.
10.
LiLPengXWangF, et al. A situation-aware collision avoidance strategy for car-following. IEEE CAA J Autom Sin2018; 5(5): 1012–1016.
11.
OuHTangTZhangJ, et al. A car-following model accounting for probability distribution. Physica A2018; 505: 105–113.
12.
ZhaoYZhangWZhangX, et al. Minimum time overtaking problem of vehicle handling inverse dynamics based on interval mathematics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob Eng2019; 233(6): 1534–1545.
13.
LuGChengBLinQ, et al. Quantitative indicator of homeostatic risk perception in car following. Saf Sci2012; 50(9): 1898–1905.
14.
HaoSYangLShiY.Data-driven car-following model based on rough set theory. IET Intell Transp Syst2018; 12(1): 49–57.
15.
XuNChenCZhangY, et al. A sequence-to-sequence car-following model for addressing driver reaction delay and cumulative error in multi-step prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2024; 25(9): 12203–12215.
16.
WangKLiuYZhangJ.Modeling human-like car-following model for intelligent vehicles based on deep reinforcement learning. Int J Automot Technol. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s12239-025-00254-4.
17.
ZhuWZhangL.A new car-following model for autonomous vehicles flow with mean expected velocity field. Physica A2018; 492: 2154–2165.
18.
HanJWangXWangG.Modeling the car-following behavior with consideration of driver, vehicle, and environment factors: a historical review. Sustainability2022; 14(13): 1–27.
19.
GuoCWangXSuL, et al. Safety distance model for longitudinal collision avoidance of logistics vehicles considering slope and road adhesion coefficient. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob Eng2021; 235(2–3): 498–512.
20.
ShangMWangSSternR.A two-condition continuous asymmetric car-following model for adaptive cruise control vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2024; 9(2): 3975–3985.
21.
WeiCPaschalidisECrusatA, et al. Human-like decision making and motion control for smooth and natural car following. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2023; 8(1): 263–274.
22.
QinPLiXBinS, et al. Research on transformer and long short-term memory neural network car-following model considering data loss. Math Biosci Eng2023; 20(11): 19617–19635.
23.
RahmanMChowdhuryMKhanT, et al. Improving the efficacy of car-following models with a new stochastic parameter estimation and calibration method. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2015; 16(5): 2687–2699.
24.
WanNZhangCVahidiA.Probabilistic anticipation and control in autonomous car following. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2019; 27(1): 30–38.
25.
GuoJLuoYLiK.Integrated adaptive dynamic surface car-following control for nonholonomic autonomous electric vehicles. Sci China Technol Sci2017; 60(8): 1221–1230.
26.
ZhangFQiZXiaoL, et al. Co-optimization on ecological adaptive cruise control and energy management of automated hybrid electric vehicles. Energy2025; 314: 133542.
27.
ZhangJWangYLuG.A new control strategy integrated into the desired safety margin car-following model considering the disturbance level. Transp Res Rec2018; 2672(20): 162–177.
28.
LianYZhaoYHuL, et al. Longitudinal collision avoidance control of electric vehicles based on a new safety distance model and constrained-regenerative-braking-strength-continuity braking force distribution strategy. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2016; 65(6): 4079–4094.
29.
ShiRHanXGuoW.Uncertain multi-objective programming approach for planning supplementary irrigation areas in rainfed agricultural regions. Irrig Drain2025; 74(3): 1193–1214.
30.
NodineELamAYanagisawaM, et al. Naturalistic study of truck following behavior. Report no. DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-16-06, U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, USA, 2016.
31.
ZhangXZhangWZhaoY, et al. Personalized motion planning and tracking control for autonomous vehicles obstacle avoidance. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2022; 71(5): 4733–4747.
32.
ZhangXZhaoYZhangW, et al. Optimal lateral control for autonomous vehicle based on multi-stage handling inverse dynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automob Eng2023; 237(10–11): 2444–2457.
33.
GuoNLiuJLiJ, et al. Handling-stability control for distributed drive electric vehicles via Lyapunov-based nonlinear MPC algorithm. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif2025; 11(2): 6615–6628.
