This study analyzes the hyperelasticity of a new design of an airless honeycomb wheel of flexible thermoplastic polyurethane made by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Tensile and compression tests were carried out to specimens and honeycomb wheels, all made of TPU and by material extrusion additive manufacturing with a Gyroid Fill Pattern. The tensile tests showed hyperelastic behavior. The Mooney-Rivlin parameters of printed TPU were estimated through tensile tests and FEM simulations assuming isotropy and using inverse engineering and trial and error methods. The Honeycomb wheels were tested by compression and modeled as hyperelastic materials using Mooney-Rivlin parameters found from tensile testing. Hyperelastic simulation shows that the honeycomb wheel could withstand the radial compression loads that it may experience on the road. This study demonstrates that combining Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing and simulations with the Mooney-Rivlin model offers a cost-effective, time-saving method to test the hyperelastic behavior of Honeycomb wheel prototypes as one sustainable mobility solution.
SardinhaMReisLRamosT, et al. Non-pneumatic tire designs suitable for fused filament fabrication: an overview. Procedia Struct Integr2022; 42: 1098–1105.
2.
AshoftehAShahdadiA.Effect of different road obstacles on the structural behavior of a honeycomb nonpneumatic tire. Tire Sci Technol2023; 51(1): 2–17.
3.
FaisalMFAkbarNIZayedAH.Development and analysis of additively manufactured non-pneumatic tires for mars rover. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2024; 1305: 012026.
4.
ZhengZRakhejaSSedaghatiR.A comparative study of static and dynamic properties of honeycomb non-pneumatic wheels and a pneumatic wheel. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(14): 3631–3646.
5.
JungSParkJMahK, et al. Study on improving the vibration characteristics of non-pneumatic tires. Trans Korean Soc Mech Eng2019; 43(6): 427–433.
6.
SimJHongJChoI, et al. Analysis of vertical stiffness characteristics based on spoke shape of non-pneumatic tire. Appl Sci2021; 11(5): 2369.
7.
DengYWangZLiuT, et al. Static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of honeycomb non-pneumatic tire under structural damage condition. Eur J Mech A Solids2023; 102: 105120.
8.
DhrangdhariyaPMaitiSRaiB.Effect of spoke design and material nonlinearity on non-pneumatic tire stiffness and durability performance. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems2021; 14(2): 117–135.
9.
NyaabaWFrimpongSAnaniA.Fatigue damage investigation of ultra-large tire components. Int J Fatigue2019; 119: 247–260.
10.
TrobentarBGlodežSZafošnikB. Gear tooth deflection of spur polymer gears. In: VelexP (ed.) International gear conference 2014. Lyon: Elsevier, 2014, pp.129–137.
11.
MuhrA.Modeling the stress-strain behavior of rubber. Rubber Chem Technol2005; 78(3): 391–425.
12.
GaoHMaXQiN, et al. A finite strain nonlinear human mitral valve model with fluid-structure interaction. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng2014; 30(12): 1597–1613.
CancecoRCamarilloRSilvaC, et al. Experimentación y Análisis por MEF del Comportamiento Hiperelástico en Materiales usados en Calzado Deportivo. Ingeniería mecánica, tecnología y desarrollo2011; 4(1): 23–31.
16.
RosuIElias-BirembauxHLebonF.Finite element modeling of an aircraft tire rolling on a steel drum: experimental investigations and numerical simulations. Appl Sci2018; 8(4): 593.
17.
EmmingerCÇakmakUPreuerR, et al. Hyperelastic material parameter determination and numerical study of TPU and PDMS dampers. Materials2021; 14(24): 7639.
18.
RühlA. Material modelling of TPU. In: RühlA (ed.) On the time and temperature dependent behaviour of laminated amorphous polymers subjected to low-velocity impact. Berlin: Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, 2017, pp.109–115.
19.
BuiHNguyenLDebrayK, et al. Modeling and experimental of the mechanical behavior of seat cushion for wheelchair users. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 540, 2019 2nd International Conference on Materials Engineering and Applications (ICMEA 2019), Da Nang, Vietnam, 16–18 January 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/540/1/012015.
20.
BeloshenkoVBeygelzimerYChishkoV, et al. Mechanical properties of flexible TPU-based 3D printed lattice structures: role of lattice cut direction and architecture. Polymers2021; 13(17): 2986.
DieterG.Mechanical metallurgy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
26.
DuttaaJNaskarK.Investigation of morphology, mechanical, dynamic mechanical and thermal behaviour of blends based on ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). RSC Adv2014; 4(105): 60831–60841.
27.
VillaniMConsonniRCanettiM, et al. Polyurethane-based composites: effects of antibacterial fillers on the physical-mechanical behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Polymers2020; 12(2): 362.
GeuzaineCRemacleJ.Gmsh: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng2009; 79(11): 1309–1331.
DhondtG.CalculiX CrunchiX user’s manual version 2.22: CalculiX. 2024.
32.
MooneyM.A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys1940; 11(9): 582–592.
33.
RivlinR. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philos Trans R Soc London A Math Phys1948; 241: 379–397.
CheungJZhangM. Mechanics of the human skin and underlying soft tissues. In: LiYDaD (eds) Biomechanical engineering of textiles and clothing. Boca Raton: Elsevier, 2006, pp.111–124.
36.
San MartinJ. Flexible TPU pneumatic actuator simulation. Tesis de Título Profesional, Universidad de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Peru, 2022.
WelSimulation LLC. WelSimulation, https://welsim.com/ (2024, accessed 6 June 2025).
39.
QiHBoyceM.Stress–strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Mech Mater2005; 37(8): 817–839.
40.
XuYJuangJ.Measurement of nonlinear Poisson’s ratio of thermoplastic polyurethanes under cyclic softening using 2D digital image correlation. Polymers2021; 13: 1498.
41.
HaidDDuncanOHartJ, et al. Characterisation of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) for additive manufacturing. In: 14. Symposium der dvs-Sektion Sportinformatik und Sporttechnologie, 2022, pp.85–88.
42.
Sosa-VivasLGonzalez-DelgadoJTorrente-PratoG.Experimental and numerical study of orthotropic behavior of 3D printed polylactic acid by material extrusion. Prog Addit Manuf2023; 8: 947–959.
43.
Torrente-PratoGSosa-VivasLGonzalez-DelgadoJ, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the orthotropic behavior of 3D printed polylactic acid by material extrusion: part two: an analysis about poisson’s ratios. Prog Addit Manuf2025; 10(4): 2335–2350.
44.
ShuaiZGaoSYuY, et al. Characteristic study and design factor analysis of a novel non-pneumatic tyre with V-shaped spokes. Mater Des2024; 238: 112681.
45.
ManeshATerchaMAyodejiO, et al. Tension-based non-pneumatic tire. Patent US 8,104,524 B2, USA, 2012.
46.
BingLXianghongX.Mechanical behavior and mechanism investigation on the optimized and novel bio-inspired nonpneumatic composite tires. Rev Adv Mater Sci2022; 61(1): 250–264.
47.
WuTLiMZhuX, et al. Research on non-pneumatic tire with gradient anti-tetrachiral structures. Mech Adv Mater Struct2020; 28(22): 2351–2359.
48.
YahiaouiMDenapeJParisJ, et al. Wear dynamics of a TPU/steel contact under reciprocal sliding. Wear2014; 315(1–2): 103–114.
49.
PinedoBHadfieldMTzanakisI, et al. Thermal analysis and tribological investigation on TPU and NBR elastomers applied to sealing applications. Tribol Int2018; 127: 24–36.
50.
WittigK.CalculiX user’s manual-CalculiX GraphiX, version 2.22. CalculiX. 2024.
51.
DengYWangZShenH, et al. A comprehensive review on non-pneumatic tyre research. Mater Des2023; 227: 111742.
52.
SardinhaMPintoJAlvesF, et al. Vertical stiffness of functionally graded hexagonal honeycomb structures for non-pneumatic tyres produced by fused filament fabrication. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications. Epub ahead of print 20 February 2025. DOI: 10.1177/14644207251320835.
BehrooziniaPKhaleghianSTaheriS, et al. An investigation towards intelligent tyres using finite element analysis. Int J Pavement Eng2018; 21(3): 311–321.
55.
NamjooMGolbakhshiH.An efficient design tool based on FEM for evaluating effects of components properties and operating conditions on interaction of tire with rigid road. J Cent South Univ2015; 22: 189–195.
56.
WenXDuZChenL.Optimization research on arc height of running surface based on reducing partial wear of straddle-type monorail vehicle running wheel tire. Adv Mech Eng2021; 13(10): 16878140211053418.
57.
CaoPZhouCJinF, et al. Tire–pavement contact stress with 3D finite-element model—part 1: semi-steel radial tires on light vehicles. J Test Eval2016; 44(2): 788–800.
58.
PremarathnaWJayasingheJGamageP, et al. Analysis of factors influencing on performance of solid tires: combined approach of design of experiments and thermo-mechanical numerical simulation. Eur J Mech A Solids2022; 96: 104680.
59.
WangJYangBLinX, et al. Research of TPU materials for 3D printing aiming at non-pneumatic tires by FDM method. Polymers2020; 12: 2492.
