Utilizing dynamic road stress factor to determine optimal pressure for air suspension system on tractor semi-trailer to minimize dynamic tire forces impacting on road
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2026
Utilizing dynamic road stress factor to determine optimal pressure for air suspension system on tractor semi-trailer to minimize dynamic tire forces impacting on road
This research delves into optimizing the pressure within air suspension systems installed on tractor semi-trailers, leveraging the Dynamic Road Stress Factor. Initially, two models are proposed: one employing a leaf spring suspension system for all axles, and the other incorporating an air suspension system for the two rear axles of the tractor. The air springs are characterized using the Gensys model, focusing on vertical dynamics. The characteristic curve of an air spring is built based on the excitation frequency. Assessment of tractor semi-trailer performance utilizing air suspension reveals a notable 20% reduction in dynamic forces exerted on the road surface compared to leaf spring systems. Ultimately, optimal air spring pressures are determined through the evaluation of the Dynamic Road Stress Factor for the tractor’s two rear axles. Based on these results, the study has proposed a plan to adjust the pressure of air springs according to different operating conditions.
NatarajMThillikkaniS.Failure analysis of leaf spring suspension system for heavy load truck vehicle. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2020; 27(1/2): 1.
3.
CebonD. Handbook of vehicle-road interaction. London: Taylor & Francis, 1999.
4.
ReinaGRoseGD.Active vibration absorber for automotive suspensions: a theoretical study. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2016; 23(1): 21.
5.
HaDVTanVVNiemVT, et al. Evaluation of dynamic load reduction for a tractor semi-trailer using the air suspension system at all axles of the semi-trailer. Actuators2022; 11(1): 12.
6.
VuVTHungTMSenameO.An investigation into the ride comfort of buses using an air suspension system. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2021; 28(2): 184–205.
7.
ChenY.Modeling, control, and design study of balanced pneumatic suspension for improved roll stability in heavy trucks. Virginia: Iowa State University, 2012.
8.
WangJ.Nonlinear modeling and h-infinity model reference control of pneumatic suspension system [Internet]. Skripsi, 2019, pp.1–125. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/26693 (accessed 30 March 2024).
9.
WangSYinCZhaoH.Matching of suspension damping and air spring based on multi-body dynamic model. IERI Procedia2012; 3: 15–21.
10.
Karimi EskandaryPKhajepourAWongA, et al. Analysis and optimization of air suspension system with independent height and stiffness tuning. Int J Autom Technol2016; 17(5): 807–816.
11.
ZhuHYangJZhangY, et al. A novel air spring dynamic model with pneumatic thermodynamics, effective friction and viscoelastic damping. J Sound Vib2017; 408: 87–104.
12.
TajimaJMomiyamaFYuharaN.A new solution for two-bag air suspension system with leaf spring for heavy-duty vehicle. Veh Syst Dyn2006; 44(2): 107–138.
13.
RobinsonWD. A pneumatic semi-active control methodology for vibration control of air spring based suspension systems. Iowa: Iowa State University, 2012.
14.
WongPKWangHZhaoJ.Robust finite-time fault-tolerant control for vehicle height and posture regulation with air suspension system subject to actuator faults, uncertainties and external disturbance. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(11): 10113–10130.
LeeSJ.Development and analysis of an air spring model. Int J Autom Technol2010; 11(4): 471–479.
17.
ViktorGJovanaJGoceT, et al. Development of a New Air Spring Dynamic Model. FME Trans2014; 42: 305–310.
18.
RazdanSAwasarePJBhaveSY.Active vibration control using air spring. J Inst Eng (India) Ser C2019; 100(1): 1–12.
19.
BergMA. Three-Dimensional Airspring Model with Friction and Orifice Damping. Vehicle System Dynamics1999; 33(1): 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.1999.12063109 (accessed 15 January 2024).
20.
AlonsoAGiménezJGNietoJ, et al. Air suspension characterisation and effectiveness of a variable area orifice. Veh Syst Dyn2010; 48(sup1): 271–286.
21.
SunXCaiYChenL, et al. Vehicle height and posture control of the electronic air suspension system using the hybrid system approach. Veh Syst Dyn2016; 54(3): 328–352.
22.
ChenGJiangYTangY, et al. Revised adaptive active disturbance rejection sliding mode control strategy for vertical stability of active hydro-pneumatic suspension. ISA Trans2023; 132: 490–507.
23.
HungTM.Optimal selection for an air suspension system on buses through a unique high level parameter in genetic algorithms. Heliyon2022; 8(3): e09059.
24.
ChangFLuZH.Dynamic model of an air spring and integration into a vehicle dynamics model. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(10): 1813–1825.
25.
QuagliaGScopesiMFrancoW.A comparison between two pneumatic suspension architectures. Veh Syst Dyn2012; 50(4): 509–526.
26.
WongJY (ed.). Theory of ground vehicles. 5th ed.Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2022. pp.1–560.
27.
ChenYHeJKingM, et al. Model development and dynamic load-sharing analysis of longitudinal-connected air suspensions. Stroj Vestn/J Mech Eng2013; 59(1): 14–24.
28.
LiuP.An analytical study of ride and handling performance of an interconnected vehicle suspension. Masters thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2005, p.150.
29.
NaraghiMNajaf zadehE. Effect of Heavy Vehicle Suspension Designs on Dynamic Road Loading A Comparative Study. SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-2766, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-2766 (accessed 20 January 2024).
De MeloFJMQPereiraABMoraisAB.The simulation of an automotive air spring suspension using a pseudo-dynamic procedure. Appl Sci2018; 8(7): 1049.
32.
NietoAJMoralesALGonzálezA, et al. An analytical model of pneumatic suspensions based on an experimental characterization. J Sound Vib2008; 313(1-2): 290–307.
33.
ReinaGGentileAMessinaA.Tyre pressure monitoring using a dynamical model-based estimator. Veh Syst Dyn2015; 53(4): 568–586.
34.
International Standard Orgainization. Mechanical vibration — road surface profiles — reporting of measured data. International Geneva, Switzerland: Standard Orgainization, 2016, p.8608.
35.
KitchingKJColeDJCebonD.Performance of a semi-active damper for heavy vehicles. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2000; 122(3): 498–506.
36.
Van TanVSenameOGasparP, et al. Active anti-roll bar control design for heavy vehicles. Berlin: Springer, 2024.
