Chebyshev polynomials based compensator design via higher order sinusoidal input describing functions in traction motor drive to improve performance of electric vehicle
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2024
Chebyshev polynomials based compensator design via higher order sinusoidal input describing functions in traction motor drive to improve performance of electric vehicle
In electric vehicles (EVs), the efficient selection of the basic elements and the control of the electric motor and the overall system is vital to extend the performance of the vehicle. A feedback control loop with proportional-integral (PI) controllers is usually used in the control of electric motors. Within the scope of this study, the system is handled with frequency-based methods and it is aimed to reduce the performance degrading effect on the system output. In this study, Higher Order Sinusoidal Input Describing Functions (HOSIDFs) are used in order to improve the performance of EVs. Here, the EV is modeled as a Lur’e-type system and a compensator is designed within the PI speed control loop of the electric motor by using Chebyshev polynomials. The optimal coefficients of the Chebyshev polynomials-based compensator minimize the cost function which is related to the harmonics of the system output. This work introduces a novel approach for controlling the traction motor of EVs using a frequency-based method through HOSIDFs. The objective is to enhance the performance of the drive system. Throughout this study, it is also aimed to improve the consumption of the battery and passenger comfort. The results and success of the proposed method are illustrated in time-domain and harmonic plots.
BharathidasanMIndragandhiVSureshV, et al. A review on electric vehicle: technologies, energy trading, and cyber security. Energy Rep2022; 8(12): 9662–9685.
2.
SanguesaJATorres-SanzVGarridoP, et al. A review on electric vehicles: technologies and challenges. Smart Cities2021; 4(1): 372–404.
3.
FaizalMFengSYZureelMF, et al. A review on challenges and opportunities of electric vehicles (EVs). J Mech Eng Res Dev2019; 42(4): 130–137.
4.
BălţăţanuAFloreaL M. Comparison of electric motors used for electric vehicles propulsion. In: AFASES 2013-proceeding of international conference of scientific paper, Brasow, Romania, 23–25 May 2013.
5.
MusliminSNawawiZSupraptoBY, et al. Comparison of batteries used in electrical vehicles. In: 5th FIRST T1 T2 2021 international conference (FIRST-T1-T2 2021), 20–21 October 2022, pp.421–425.
6.
ManzettiSMariasiuF. Electric vehicle battery technologies: from present state to future systems. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2015; 51: 1004–1012.
7.
RimpasDChalkiadakisP. Electric vehicle transmission types and setups: a general review. Int J Electric Hybrid Vehicles2021; 13(1): 38–56.
8.
JoshiPUgaleA. Overview of transmission system for the electric vehicle. Int J Res Eng Technol2020; 7(6): 910–913.
9.
SpanoudakisPTsourveloudisNDoitsidisL, et al. Experimental research of transmissions on electric vehicles’ energy consumption. Energies2019; 12(3): 388.
10.
AhssanMREktesabiMMGorjiSA. Electric vehicle with multi-speed transmission: a review on performances and complexities. SAE Int J Altern Powertrains2018; 7(2): 169–181.
11.
QianKLiuXWangY, et al. Modified dual extended Kalman filters for SOC estimation and online parameter identification of lithium-ion battery via modified gray wolf optimizer. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2022; 236(8): 1761–1774.
12.
QianKFLiuXT. Hybrid optimization strategy for lithium-ion battery’s state of charge/health using joint of dual Kalman filter and modified sine-cosine algorithm. J Energy Storage2021; 44: 103319.
13.
JoshiADandotiyaDRameshC, et al. Numerical analysis of battery thermal management system using passive cooling technique. SAE technical paper 2023-01-0990, 2023.
14.
ThakurAKSathyamurthyRVelrajR, et al. A state-of-the art review on advancing battery thermal management systems for fast-charging. Appl Therm Eng2023; 226: 120303.
15.
KhaboshanHNJaliliantabarFAbdullahAA, et al. Improving the cooling performance of cylindrical lithium-ion battery using three passive methods in a battery thermal management system. Appl Therm Eng2023; 227: 120320.
16.
TaleleVPatilMSPanchalS, et al. Novel metallic separator coupled composite phase change material passive thermal design for large format prismatic battery pack. J Energy Storage2023; 58: 106336.
17.
LiWXieYHuX, et al. An internal heating strategy for lithium-ion batteries without lithium plating based on self-adaptive alternating current pulse. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2023; 72(5): 5809–5823.
18.
PanchalSPierreVCancianM, et al. Development and validation of cycle and calendar aging model for 144Ah NMC/graphite battery at multi temperatures, DODs, and C-rates. SAE technical paper 2023-01-0503, 2023.
19.
BragaRMevawallaAGudiyellaS, et al. Transient electrochemical model development and validation of a 144 Ah Cell performance under different drive cycles conditions. SAE technical paper 2023-01-0513, 2023.
20.
LiJZhangH. Thermal characteristics of power battery module with composite phase change material and external liquid cooling. Int J Heat Mass Transf2020; 156: 119820.
21.
CubilloAVermeulenJRodriguez de la PeñaM, et al. Physics-based integrated vehicle health management system for predicting the remaining useful life of an aircraft planetary gear transmission. Int J Struct Integr2017; 8(4): 484–495.
22.
LiYHZhangCYinH, et al. Modification optimization-based fatigue life analysis and improvement of EMU gear. Int J Struct Integr2021; 12(5): 760–772.
23.
YuXLiuXWangX, et al. Vibration control of improved LQG for wheel drive electric vehicle based on uncertain parameters. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(8): 2253–2264.
24.
Mish-alTPGetzial Anbu ManiPParvathyAK. Development of electric vehicle model in Matlab/Simulink. In: 2022 8th international conference on smart structures and systems (ICSSS), Chennai, India, 21–22 April 2022, pp.1–7. New York: IEEE.
25.
SharmilaBSrinivasanKDevasenaD, et al. Modelling and performance analysis of electric vehicle. Int J Ambient Energy2022; 43(1): 5034–5040.
26.
SloughJBelcherMTsuiT, et al. Modeling and simulation of electric vehicles using Simulink and Simscape. In: 2021 IEEE 94th vehicular technology conference (VTC 2021-Fall), Norman, OK, USA, 27–30 September 2021, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
27.
KaushikS. Modeling and simulation of electric vehicle to optimize its cost and range. Int J Eng Adv Technol2019; 8(6): 415–419.
28.
MohdTATHassanMKAzizWA. Mathematical modeling and simulation of an electric vehicle. J Mech Eng Sci2015; 8: 1312–1321.
29.
WangHSunTZhouX, et al. Research on the electric vehicle control system. Int J u-and e-Serv Sci Technol2015; 8(8): 103–110.
30.
OubelaidATaibNNikolovskiS, et al. Intelligent speed control and performance investigation of a vector controlled electric vehicle considering driving cycles. Electronics2022; 11(13): 1925.
31.
CherifKSahbaniASaadKB. Control approaches of permanent magnet synchronous motor used for electric vehicle power train. In: 2nd international conference on industry 4.0 and artificial intelligence (ICIAI 2021), Tunisia-Sousse, 29–31 May 2021, pp.83–87.
32.
NuijPWJMBosgraOHSteinbuchM. Higher-order sinusoidal input describing functions for the analysis of non-linear systems with harmonic responses. Mech Syst Signal Process2006; 20(8): 1883–1904.
33.
RijlaarsdamDNuijPSchoukensJ, et al. Frequency domain based nonlinear feed forward control design for friction compensation. Mech Syst Signal Process2012; 27(1): 551–562.
34.
UcunLSalášekJ. HOSIDF-based feedforward friction compensation in low-velocity motion control systems. Mechatron2014; 24(2): 118–127.
35.
UcunL. Feedforward friction compensator design for shake table system. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi2019; 34(1): 255–264.
36.
RijlaarsdamDNuijPSchoukensJ, et al. A comparative overview of frequency domain methods for nonlinear systems. Mechatron2017; 42: 11–24.
37.
RijlaarsdamDJSetiadiACNuijPWJM, et al. Frequency domain-based nonlinearity detection and compensation in Lur’e systems. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2013; 23(10): 1168–1182.
38.
ErolBOzMAUcunL. Two-degree-of-freedom compensator design for disturbance attenuation problem via higher order sinusoidal input describing functions theory. Trans Inst Meas Contr2021; 43(5): 1009–1018.
39.
TacalBUcunL. Bernstein polynomials based compensator design for coupled tank system with saturation nonlinearity. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2022; 236(7): 1274–1284.
40.
ChenYJhaSRautA, et al. Performance characteristics of lubricants in electric and hybrid vehicles: a review of current and future needs. Front Mech Eng2020; 6: 571464.
41.
IuliaVLorándS. A brief history of electric vehicles. J Comput Sci Control Syst2022; 15(1): 19–26.
42.
YongJYRamachandaramurthyVKTanKM, et al. A review on the state-of-the-art technologies of electric vehicle, its impacts and prospects. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2015; 49: 365–385.
43.
WalkerJ. Fundamentals of physics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
44.
E.SchaltzElectrical vehicle design and modeling. In: SSoylu. (ed.) Electric vehicles-modelling and simulations. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2011, pp.1–24.
45.
JapeSRThosarA. Comparison of electric motors for electric vehicle application. Int J Res Eng Technol2017; 6(8): 12–17.
46.
RindSJRenYHuY, et al. Configurations and control of traction motors for electric vehicles: a review. Chin J Elect Eng2017; 3(3): 1–17.
47.
AbdElMaguid AhmedWAdelMMTahaM, et al. PSO technique applied to sensorless field-oriented control PMSM drive with discretized RL-fractional integral. Alex Eng J2021; 60(4): 4029–4040.
48.
KubickiMPietrusewiczKWaszczukP. Method of friction modeling and identification in PMSM. Meas Autom Monit2016; 62(9): 308–311.
49.
WeiGYuZShi-HuaL. Research on friction compensation for PMSM servo systems. In: 2016 Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China, 28–30 May 2016, pp.6735–6740.
50.
BidaVMSamokhvalovDVAl-MahturiFS. PMSM vector control techniques—a survey. In: 2018 IEEE conference of Russian young researchers in electrical and electronic engineering (EIConRus), Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia, 29 January–1 February 2018, pp.577–581. New York: IEEE.
51.
MohanN. Electric machines and drives: a first course. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2012.
52.
AklMMAhmedAARashadE EM. A wide component sizing and performance assessment of electric drivetrains for electric vehicles. In: 2019 21st international Middle East power systems conference (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, 17–19 December 2019, pp.834–839. New York: IEEE.
53.
ParkGLeeSJinS, et al. Integrated modeling and analysis of dynamics for electric vehicle powertrains. Expert Syst Appl2014; 41(5): 2595–2607.
54.
WangQGaoTLiX. SOC estimation of lithium-ion battery based on equivalent circuit model with variable parameters. Energies2022; 15(16): 5829.
55.
MantravadiSRP. Modeling, simulation & implementation of li-ion battery powered electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles. Master’s Thesis, University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA, 2011.
56.
RubenbauerHHenningerS. Definitions and reference values for battery systems in electrical power grids. J Energy Storage2017; 12: 87–107.
57.
YangSWangWLinC, et al. Investigation of internal short circuits of lithium-ion batteries under mechanical abusive conditions. Energies2019; 12(10): 1885.
58.
MarotiPKPadmanabanSBhaskarMS, et al. The state-of-the-art of power electronics converters configurations in electric vehicle technologies. Power Electron Devices Compon2022; 1: 100001.
59.
PoorfakhraeiANarimaniMEmadiA. A review of modulation and control techniques for multilevel inverters in traction applications. IEEE Open2021; 9: 24187–24204.
60.
YalavarthyURSGadiVSKR. Modelling, simulation and analysis of indirect space vector control of electric vehicle driven by permanent magnet synchronous motor with Fuzzy Controller. Math Model Eng Probl2022; 9(2): 523–532.
61.
MohanN. Advanced electric drives: analysis, control, and modeling using MATLAB/Simulink. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
62.
RuanJWalkerPDWuJ, et al. Development of continuously variable transmission and multi-speed dual-clutch transmission for pure electric vehicle. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10(2): 1687814018758223.
63.
LiangQTangNGaoB, et al. The seamless gear shifting control for pure electric vehicle with 2-speed inverse-AMT. IFAC Proc Volumes2013; 46(21): 507–511.
