A cloud-edge combined control system with MPC parameter optimization for path tracking of unmanned ground vehicle

Abstract

As a new carrier to carry out intelligent task, the unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) is an important component of the intelligent transportation system (ITS) in the future. Most of traditional UGV path tracking control methods are deployed in the edge-side (on-board computing platform) with restricted data, which severely limits the improvement of UGVs’ path tracking performance. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel cloud-edge combined control system with MPC parameter optimization based on cloud brain control center (CBCC) applied in future ITS, which consists of edge-side control module and cloud-side optimization module. The proposed control system can optimize control parameters iteratively in CBCC by making the utmost of big data generated by UGVs to markedly enhance the control effectiveness. In CBCC, the path tracking performance is quantitatively evaluated from the aspects of path tracking accuracy, vehicle stability, and control stability. Also, an optimization algorithm is established by using SVR theory. Based on this, the cloud-side optimization module optimizes the control parameters of the edge-side control module by collecting and processing the big data generated by UGVs while driving. Besides, the designed edge-side control module is based on MPC algorithm and innovatively introduces a compensator which obviously reduces the error caused by the inaccuracy of the prediction model. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed cloud-edge combined control system, numerous simulation experiments are carried out. The results shows that the proposed cloud-edge combined control system can improve UGV’s path tracking performance and have strong robustness at different speeds.

Keywords

Cloud-edge combined control UGV path tracking control cloud brain control center intelligent transportation system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kamel

Zhang

. Formation control and coordination of multiple unmanned ground vehicles in normal and faulty situations: a review. Annu Rev Control 2020; 49: 128–144.

Liu

, et al. Formation control of nonholonomic unmanned ground vehicles via unscented Kalman filter-based sensor fusion approach. ISA Trans. Epub ahead of print 12 July 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.07.012.

Rokonuzzaman

Mohajer

Nahavandi

, et al. Review and performance evaluation of path tracking controllers of autonomous vehicles. IET Intel Transport Syst 2021; 15(5): 646–670.

Amer

Zamzuri

Hudha

, et al. Modelling and control strategies in path tracking control for autonomous ground vehicles: a review of state of the art and challenges. J Intel Rob Syst 2017; 86(2): 225–254.

Alcala

Puig

Quevedo

, et al. Autonomous vehicle control using a kinematic Lyapunov-based technique with LQR-LMI tuning. Control Eng Pract 2018; 73: 1–12.

Jha

Turetsky

Shima

. Robust path tracking by a dubins ground vehicle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2019; 27(6): 2614–2621.

Hang

Chen

. Path tracking control of 4-wheel-steering autonomous ground vehicles based on linear parameter-varying system with experimental verification. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2021; 235(3): 411–423.

Fan

Chen

. Study on path following control method for automatic parking system based on LQR. SAE Int J Passenger Cars Electron Electr Syst 2017; 10(1): 41–49.

Guo

Zhang

Zou

, et al. A computationally efficient path-following control strategy of autonomous electric vehicles with yaw motion stabilization. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif 2020; 6(2): 728–739.

10.

Cavanini

Ippoliti

Camacho

. Model predictive control for a linear parameter varying model of an UAV. J Intell Rob Syst 2021; 101(3): 57.

11.

, et al. Fast velocity trajectory planning and control algorithm of intelligent 4WD electric vehicle for energy saving using time-based MPC. IET Intell Transport Syst 2019; 13(1): 153–159.

12.

Liao-McPherson

Huang

Kim

, et al. Model predictive emissions control of a diesel engine airpath: design and experimental evaluation. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 2020; 30(17): 7446–7477.

13.

Hang

Xia

Chen

, et al. Active safety control of automated electric vehicles at driving limits: a tube-based MPC approach. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif. Epub ahead of print 28 July 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2021.3100843.

14.

Chen

Ren

, et al. Path tracking and handling stability control strategy with collision avoidance for the autonomous vehicle under extreme conditions. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2020; 69(12): 14602–14617.

15.

Wurts

Stein

Ersal

. Collision imminent steering at high speed using nonlinear model predictive control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2020; 69(8): 8278–8289.

16.

Tang

Wang

, et al. Coordinated control for path following of two-wheel independently actuated autonomous ground vehicle. IET Intell Transp Syst 2019; 13(4): 628–635.

17.

Cheng

Guo

, et al. Longitudinal collision avoidance and lateral stability adaptive control system based on MPC of autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2020; 21(6): 2376–2385.

18.

Guo

Cao

Chen

, et al. Model predictive path following control for autonomous cars considering a measurable disturbance: implementation, testing, and verification. Mech Syst Signal Process 2019; 118: 41–60.

19.

Jiang

Zhang

. Heading tracking of 6WID/4WIS unmanned ground vehicles with variable wheelbase based on model free adaptive control. Mech Syst Signal Process 2021; 159: 107715.

20.

Norouzi

Heidarifar

Shahbakhti

, et al. Model predictive control of internal combustion engines: a review and future directions. Energies 2021; 14(19): 6251.

21.

Shojaei

. Neural adaptive PID formation control of car-like mobile robots without velocity measurements. Adv Rob 2017; 31(18): 947–964.

22.

Shojaei

Yousefi

. Tracking control of a convoy of autonomous robotic cars with a prescribed performance. Trans Inst Meas Control 2019; 41(13): 3725–3741.

23.

Shan

Zheng

Chen

, et al. A reinforcement learning-based adaptive path tracking approach for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2020; 69(10): 10581–10595.

24.

Tian

Cao

Huang

, et al. Learning to drive like human beings: a method based on deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. Epub ahead of print 10 February 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3055899.

25.

, et al. An improved bayesian combination model for short-term traffic prediction with deep learning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2020; 21(3): 1332–1342.

26.

Chang

Chiou

. Cloud computing-based analyses to predict vehicle driving shockwave for active safe driving in intelligent transportation system. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2020; 21(2): 852–866.

27.

Liu

. Predictive control of networked multiagent systems via cloud computing. IEEE Trans Cybern 2017; 47(8): 1852–1859.

28.

Cai

. Curved path following for unmanned surface vehicles with heading amendment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2021; 51(7): 4183–4192.

29.

Wang

Yan

, et al. Should the desired heading in path following of autonomous vehicles be the tangent direction of the desired path? IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2015; 16(6): 3084–3094.