The chest is one of the most frequently injured body parts during a side impact. In this study, the effects of impact angle, impact speed, and D-ring position on the occupant’s chest injury in the far-side crash were analyzed. First, a model with a sled and a Test Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) dummy was established. Second, the acceleration curves with peaks of 6.6 and 9.0 g were applied to the sled. Then 12 sets of simulations with different impact angles and D-ring positions were conducted to evaluate the occupant’s chest responses. Results indicate that the peak chest deflection at Lower Left (LL) decreased by 11.6% on average, and that at Lower Right (LR) increased by 11.7% on average when the D-ring position moved backward. Meanwhile, with the D-ring position moving upward, the peak chest deflection at LL grew by 24.8% on average, while it decreased by 14.7% at LR.
YoganandanNFitzharrisMPintarF-A, et al. Demographics, velocity distributions, and impact type as predictors of ais 4+ head injuries in motor vehicle crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med2011; 55: 267–280.
2.
GablerH-CDiggesK-HFildesB-N, et al. Side impact injury risk for belted far side passenger vehicle occupants. SAE Trans2005; 114(6): 34–42.
3.
FildesB-NFitzharrisMGablerH-C, et al. Chest and abdominal injuries to occupants in far side crashes. In: Proceedings of 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21June2007, paper no. 07-038.
4.
ShawJ-MHerriottR-GMcfaddenJ-D, et al. Oblique and lateral impact response of the PMHS thorax. Stapp Car Crash J2006; 50(1): 147–167.
5.
RhuleHSuntayBHerriottR, et al. Response of the PMHS thorax in lateral and oblique pneumatic ram impacts-investigation of impact speed, impact location and impact face. In: International research council on the biomechanics of injury, Berlin, Germany, 2014, paper no. IRC-14-61, pp.506–527.
6.
WangFYangJ-KLiG-B, et al. Numerical analysis of human thoracic injury responses in vehicle lateral and oblique crashes. Chin J Theor Appl Mech2016; 48 (1): 225–234.
7.
ArunMUmaleSHummJ-R, et al. Evaluation of kinematics and injuries to restrained occupants in far-side crashes using full-scale vehicle and human body models. J Crash Prev Inj Control2016; 17(Suppl 1): 116–123.
8.
FildesB-NSparkeL-JBoströmO, et al. Suitability of current side impact test dummies in far-side impacts. In: Proceedings of IRCOBI conference, Munich, Germany, 18–20 September 2002, pp.43–56.
9.
FildesB-NBostromOSparkeL, et al. The influence of a flexible lumbar spine in far-side impact testing. Int J crashworthiness2006; 11(3): 273–280.
10.
PintarFYoganandanNStemperB, et al. Far side impact response and dummy biofidelity. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Stapp car crash conference, Orlando, Florida, 2007, pp.123–127.
11.
YoganandanNHauschildHHummJ, et al. THOR dummy chest deflection response in oblique and lateral far-side sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev2019; 20(Suppl 1): S32–S37.
12.
DouglasC-AFildesB-NGibsonT-J, et al. Factors influencing occupant-to-seat belt interaction in far-side crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med2007; 51: 319–339.
13.
PintarF-AYoganandanNStemperB-D, et al. Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT responses in simulated far side impact. Stapp Car Crash J2007; 51: 313–360.
14.
FormanJ-LLopez-ValdesFLessleyD-J, et al. Occupant kinematics and shoulder belt retention in far-side lateral and oblique collisions: a parametric study. Stapp Car Crash J2013; 57: 343–385.
15.
UmaleSYoganandanNPintarF-A, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of occupant retention under far-side impacts: a parametric study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018; 84: 235–248.
16.
EdwardsM-ANashC-E. Inflatable shoulder belts and inboard upper anchor shoulder-belt geometry in far-side oblique impacts. In: Proceedings of international research council on the biomechanics of injury conference, Antwerp, Belgium, 13–15 September 2017, paper no. IRC-17-56, pp.373–389.
17.
GablerHCFitzharrisMScullyJ, et al. Far side impact injury risk for belted occupants in Australia and the United States. In: Proceedings of the international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, 2005, paper no. 05-0420.
18.
ShawCGParentDPPurtsezovS, et al. Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading. Stapp Car Crash J2009; 53: 1–48
19.
PeiY-J.Research on occupant protection of far side collision base on THUMS human model. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2017.
20.
Perez-RapelaDDonlonJ-PFormanJ-L, et al. Occupant restraint in far-side impacts: cadaveric and WorldSID responses to a far-side airbag. Ann Biomed Eng2021; 49(2): 802–811.
21.
Perez-RapelaDMarkusicCWhitcombB, et al. Comparison of the simplified GHBMC to PMHS kinematics in far-side impact. In: Proceedings of IRCOBI conference, Florence, Italy, September 2019.
22.
CavanaughJ-MYoganandanN. Thorax injury biomechanics. In: YoganandanNNahumAM and Medical College of Wisconsin (eds.) Accidental injury: biomechanics and prevention. 3rd ed.New York, NY: Springer, 2015, pp.331–372.
23.
MackayG-MHillJParkinS, et al. Restrained occupants on the nonstruck side in lateral collisions. Accid Anal Prev1993; 25(2): 147–52.
24.
EllwayJHallbauerKKerzG-T. The development of a euro NCAP far side occupant test and assessment procedure. In: Proceedings of the 26th enhanced safety of vehicles conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 12 June 2019, pp.276–301.
