Characteristics of Rear-End Collisions: A Comparison between Automated Driving System-Involved Crashes and Advanced Driving Assistance System-Involved Crashes

Abstract

With the increasing number of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems (ADS) being tested on public roads and the expanding market share of vehicles equipped with advanced driving assistance systems (ADAS), the number of ADS- or ADAS-involved crashes increases. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the distribution of ADS- and ADAS-involved crashes and the factors leading to them. The rear-end collision has been found to dominate ADS-involved crashes. However, no research has explored the conditions when ADS-involved rear-end collisions are more likely to happen and no research has investigated ADAS-involved rear-end crashes. Based on 130 ADS-involved crashes and 84 ADAS-involved crashes extracted from a dataset collected by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) between July 2021 and May 2022, this study explored the crash patterns, especially rear-end crashes, of ADS- and ADAS-controlled vehicles. Results show that rear-end collisions dominate both ADS- and ADAS-involved crashes, especially ADAS-involved crashes. The type of both ADS-involved and ADAS-involved crashes was affected by the speed of the ego-vehicle relative to the posted speed limit. Further, the type of ADS-involved crash was affected by the pre-crash movement of the crash partner, while the type of ADAS-involved crash was further associated with the road type. The findings can provide insights into the design of ADAS and ADS control algorithms, the external human-machine interface design of the vehicles with ADS or ADAS, and the training program of human road users to improve traffic safety in mixed traffic.

Keywords

ADS ADAS crashes rear-end collisions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Singh

Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. Report No. DOT HS 812 115. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2015.

SAE International. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (J3016_202104). https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/. Accessed February 17, 2022.

Canalys. Huge Opportunity as Only 10% of the 1 Billion Cars in Use Have ADAS Features. https://canalys.com/newsroom/huge-opportunity-as-only-10-of-the-1-billion-cars-in-use-have-adas-features. Accessed July 21, 2022.

Wang

Chen

Yan

Approaching Autonomous Driving With Cautious Optimism: Analysis of Road Traffic Injuries Involving Autonomous Vehicles Based on Field Test Data. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2021, pp. 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043402

Favarò

F. M.

Nader

Eurich

S. O.

Tripp

Varadaraju

Examining Accident Reports Involving Autonomous Vehicles in California. PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2017, p. e0184952. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184952

Schoettle

Sivak

A Preliminary Analysis of Real-World Crashes Involving Self-Driving Vehicles. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, 2015.

Goodall

N. J.

Comparison of Automated Vehicle Struck-From-Behind Crash Rates With National Rates Using Naturalistic Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 154, 2021, p. 106056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106056

Boggs

A. M.

Wali

Khattak

A. J.

Exploratory Analysis of Automated Vehicle Crashes in California: A Text Analytics & Hierarchical Bayesian Heterogeneity-Based Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 135, 2020, p. 105354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105354

Petrović

Đ.

Mijailović

Pešić

Traffic Accidents With Autonomous Vehicles: Type of Collisions, Manoeuvres and Errors of Conventional Vehicles’ Drivers. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 45, 2020, pp. 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.003

10.

Liu

Wang

Glaser

Crash Comparison of Autonomous and Conventional Vehicles Using Pre-Crash Scenario Typology. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 159, 2021, p. 106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106281

11.

Song

Chitturi

M. V.

Noyce

D. A.

Automated Vehicle Crash Sequences: Patterns and Potential Uses in Safety Testing. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 106017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106017

12.

Huang

Wen

Jian

Sharing the Road: How Human Drivers Interact With Autonomous Vehicles on Highways. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1437–1441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661165

13.

DeGuzman

C. A.

Donmez

Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 65, No. 4, 2023, p. 663. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211026133

14.

de Winter

J. C. F.

Happee

Martens

M. H.

Stanton

N. A.

Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control and Highly Automated Driving on Workload and Situation Awareness: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 27, 2014, pp. 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016

15.

Donmez

Influence of Driving Experience on Distraction Engagement in Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119843476

16.

Mahdinia

Arvin

Khattak

A. J.

Ghiasi

Safety, Energy, and Emissions Impacts of Adaptive Cruise Control and Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120918572

17.

Wang

Longitudinal Safety Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicle’s Degradation. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 69, 2019, pp. 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.002

18.

Monfort

S. S.

Reagan

I. J.

Cicchino

J. B.

Gershon

Mehler

Reimer

Speeding Behavior While Using Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Centering in Free Flow Traffic. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2022, pp. 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.2013476

19.

Lyu

Duan

Safety Margins – a Novel Approach From Risk Homeostasis Theory for Evaluating the Impact of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems on Driving Behavior in Near-Crash Events. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2021, pp. 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2020.1795846

20.

Dumitru

A. I.

Girbacia

Boboc

R. G.

Postelnicu

C.-C.

Mogan

G.-L.

Effects of Smartphone Based Advanced Driver Assistance System on Distracted Driving Behavior: A Simulator Study. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 83, 2018, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.011

21.

Dixit

V. V.

Chand

Nair

D. J.

Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times. PLoS One, Vol. 11, No. 12, 2016, p. e0168054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168054

22.

Waymo

LLC

. Waymo Open Dataset. waymo.com/open/. Accessed Febuary 17, 2022.

23.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Standing General Order on Crash Reporting for Incidents Involving ADS and Level 2 ADAS. https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/standing-general-order-crash-reporting. Accessed July 21, 2022.

24.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Summary Report: Standing General Order on Crash Reporting for Automated Driving Systems. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2022.

25.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Summary Report: Standing General Order on Crash Reporting for Level 2 Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2022.

26.

Banerjee

S. S.

Jha

Cyriac

Kalbarczyk

Z. T.

Iyer

R. K.

Hands Off the Wheel in Autonomous Vehicles?: A Systems Perspective on over a Million Miles of Field Data. 2018 48th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2018, pp. 586–597.

27.

Dadvar

Ahmed

M. M.

California Autonomous Vehicle Crashes: Explanatory Data Analysis and Classification Tree. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2021.

28.

Chance Scott

Sen Roy

Prasad

Spatial Patterns of Off-the-System Traffic Crashes in Miami–Dade County, Florida, during 2005–2010. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 17, No. 7, 2016, pp. 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1144878

29.

National Safety Council. Car Crashes by Time of Day and Day of Week. https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/overview/crashes-by-time-of-day-and-day-of-week/. Accessed July 21, 2022.

30.

Ding

Wang

Statistical Analysis of the Patterns and Characteristics of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Involved Crashes. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 71, 2019, pp. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.001

31.

Bullough

J. D.

Donnell

E. T.

Rea

M. S.

To Illuminate or Not to Illuminate: Roadway Lighting as It Affects Traffic Safety at Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.029

32.

Burnham

K. P.

Anderson

D. R.

Multimodel Inference. Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2004, pp. 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644

33.

Kanaan

Donmez

In-Vehicle Displays to Support Driver Anticipation of Traffic Conflicts in Automated Vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 149, 2021, p. 105842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105842

34.

Matthews

Neubauer

Saxby

D. J.

Wohleber

R. W.

Lin

Dangerous Intersections? A Review of Studies of Fatigue and Distraction in the Automated Vehicle. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 126, 2019, pp. 85–94.

35.

Gold

Damböck

Lorenz

Bengler

“Take Over!” How Long Does It Take to Get the Driver Back Into the Loop?

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1938–1942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433

36.

Vogelpohl

Kühn

Hummel

Gehlert

Vollrath

Transitioning to Manual Driving Requires Additional Time After Automation Deactivation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 55, 2018, pp. 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.019

37.

Zhu

Wang

Impact on Car Following Behavior of a Forward Collision Warning System with Headway Monitoring. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 111, 2020, pp. 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.015

38.

Hensch

A.-C.

Neumann

Beggiato

Halama

Krems

J. F.

Effects of a Light-Based Communication Approach as an External HMI for Automated Vehicles–a Wizard-of-Oz Study. Transactions on Transport Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2019, pp. 18–32.

39.

Papakostopoulos

Nathanael

Portouli

Amditis

Effect of External HMI for Automated Vehicles (AVs) on Drivers’ Ability to Infer the AV Motion Intention: A Field Experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 82, 2021, pp. 32–42.

40.

Schieben

Wilbrink

Kettwich

Dodiya

Weber

Sorokin

Lee

Y.-M.

Madigan

Markkula

Merat

Testing External HMI Designs for Automated Vehicles–An Overview on User Study Results From the EU Project InterACT. Tagung Automatisiertes Fahren, Munich, Germany, 2019.