Product-family shared-component selection based on the consistency constraint function

Abstract

This article presents an engineering method based on the collaborative optimization consistency constraint function for selecting shared components in modular platforms; the method allows the operator to minimize the differences in design variables across various models simultaneously. A case study using the body-in-white information on three vehicles serves as an example. Static bending conditions and static torsion conditions are comprehensively considered with the mass and the maximum displacement as the optimization objectives in Isight and Hyperworks (both of which are commercially available software applications commonly used by automotive engineers.) The results suggest that this method can be easily and effectively utilized in the conceptual phase of car design.

Keywords

Modular platform product family component selection body-in-white consistency constraint function

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liu

Kiang

Brusco

. A unified framework for market segmentation and its applications. Expert Systems Applic 2012; 39(11): 10 292.10-302.

Meyer

Lehnerd

. The power of product platforms. New York: Free Press, 1997, p. 288.

Becher

Zirpoli

. Organizing new product development: knowledge hollowing-out and knowledge integration – the FIAT auto case. Int J Ops Prod Managmt 2003; 23(9): 1033–1061.

Lampón

Cabanelas

González Benito

. The impact of implementation of a modular platform strategy in automobile manufacturing networks. Governance and Economics Research Network Working Paper B 2015–2, Universidade de Vigo, Ourense, Spain, 2015.

Messac

Martinez

Simpson

. Effective product family design using physical programming and the product platform concept exploration method. Engng Optimization 2002; 34: 245–261.

Ericsson

Erixon

. Controlling design variants: modular product platforms. New York: ASME, 1999.

Buiga

. Investigating the role of MQB platform in Volkswagen Group’s strategy and automobile industry. Int J Acad Res Business Social Sci 2012; 2(9): 391–399.

Sehgal

Gorai

. Platform strategy will shape future of OEMs. White paper, Evalueserve, Schaffhausen, Switzerland, 2012.

Ulrich

. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 1995; 24(3): 419–440.

10.

Chowdhury

Maldonado

Tong

Messac

. New modular product platform planning approach to design macroscale reconfigurable unmanned aerial vehicles. J Aircr 2016; 53(2): 309–322.

11.

Simpson

Maier

JRA

Weck

. Platform-based design and development: current trends and needs in industry. In: ASME 2006 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Vol 1, 32nd design automation conference, Parts A and B, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 10–13 September 2006, paper DETC2006-99229, pp. 801–810. New York: ASME.

12.

Pakkanen

Juuti

Lehtonen

. Brownfield process: a method for modular product family development aiming for product configuration. Des Stud 2016; 45: 210–241.

13.

Karmarkar

Kubat

. Modular product design and product support. Eur J Opl Res 1987; 29(1): 74–82.

14.

Nayak

Chen

Allen

. A variation-based methodology for product platform design. In: ASME 2000 design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 10–13 September 2000, paper DETC00/DAC-14264, pp. 1–10. New York: ASME.

15.

Nelson

Parkinson

Papalambros

. Multicriteria optimization in product platform design. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2001; 123, 199–204.

16.

Kokkolaras

Fellini

Kim

. Extension of the target cascading formulation to the design of product families. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2002; 24: 293–301.

17.

Fellini

Kokkolaras

Papalambros

. Platform selection under performance bounds in optimal design of product families. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2005, 127: 524–535.

18.

Fellini

Kokkolaras

Papalambros

. Quantitative platform selection in optimal design of product families, with application to automotive engine design. J Engng Des 2006; 17(5): 429–446.

19.

Olewnik

Lewis

. A decision support framework for flexible system design. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2006; 17(1): 75–97.

20.

Ferguson

Kasprzak

Lewis

. Designing a family of reconfigurable vehicles using multilevel multidisciplinary design optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2009; 39(2): 171–186.

21.

Torstenfelt

Klarbring

. Conceptual optimal design of modular car product families using simultaneous size, shape and topology optimization. Finite Elements Analysis Des 2007; 43: 1050–1061.

22.

Torstenfelt

Klarbring

. Structural optimization of modular product families with application to car space frame structures. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2006; 32: 133–140.

23.

Chowdhury

Messac

Khire

. Comprehensive product platform planning framework. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2011; 133(10): 101004.

24.

Chowdhury

Messac

Khire

. Investigating the commonality attributes for scaling product families using comprehensive product platform planning. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2013; 48(6): 1089–1107.

25.

Khajavirad

Michalek

. A decomposed gradient-based approach for generalized platform selection and variant design in product family optimization. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 2008; 130(7): 071101.

26.

Pate

Patterson

German

. Optimizing families of reconfigurable aircraft for multiple missions. L’Aerophile 2012; 49(6): 1988–2000.

27.

Doran

Hill

. A review of modular strategies and architecture within manufacturing operations. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automoblie Engineering 2009; 223(1): 65–75.

28.

Bonvoisin

Halstenberg

Buchert

Stark

. A systematic literature review on modular product design. J Engng Des 2016; 27(7): 488–514.

29.

Rebentisch

Schuh

Rudolf

et al . Technology assessment for modular product platforms with fuzzy numbers. In: 26th CIRP design conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 15–17 June 2016, pp. 601–606. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

30.

Zou

Yao

Xia

. A sensitivity-based coordination method for optimization of product families. Engng Optimization 2016; 48(7): 1145–1163.

31.

McAlinden

Smith

Swiecki

. The future of modular automotive systems: where are the economic efficiencies in the modular assembly concept? Michigan Automotive Partnership Research Memorandum 1, Report 2000-24-1, University of Michigan Transport Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2000.

32.

Baldwin

Clark

. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Rev 1997; 75(5): 84–93.

33.

Camuffo

. Rolling out a ‘world car’: globalization, outsourcing and modularity in the auto industry, IMVP working paper, https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/719 (2002).

34.

Sako

Murray

. Modules in design, production and use: implications for the global automotive industry. In: International motor vehicle program annual sponsors meeting, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 5–7 October 1999.

35.

Langlois

. Modularity in technology and organization. J Econ Behav Orgn 2002; 49: 19–37.

36.

Sanchez

Collins

. Competing and learning in modular markets. Long Range Planning 2001; 34(6): 645–66.

37.

Seiffert

Hermann

. Handbook of automotive engineering. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: SAE International, 2005.

38.

Hou

Wang

Hou

. Multi-objective optimization design of body assembly structure in conceptual design stage. In: Chinese congress of theoretical and applied mechanics, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, 15–18 August 2015, paper A21-E0995. Beijing: CAST.

39.

Abido

. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for electric power dispatch problem. IEEE Trans Evolutionary Comput 2006; 10(3): 315–329.

40.

Wang

Zhang

. Design and application of lightweight multi-objective collaborative optimization for a parametric body-in-white structure. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automoblie Engineering 2016; 230(2): 273–288.

41.

Balesdent

Bérend

Dépincé

Chriette

. A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 2012; 45(5): 619–642.

42.

Kroo

Altus

Braun

. Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design. In: 5th symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Panama City Beach, Florida, USA, 7–9 September 1994, pp. 697–707. Reston, Virginia: AIAA.

43.

Braun

Gage

Kroo

. Implementation and performance issues in collaborative optimization. In: 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 4–6 September 1996, pp. 295–305. Reston, Virginia: AIAA.

44.

Messac

. Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J 1996; 34(1): 149–158.

45.

Hou

Shan

Zhang

. Multi-level optimization method for vehicle body in conceptual design. In: ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Vol 3, 17th international conference on advanced vehicle technologies; 12th international conference on design education; 8th frontiers in biomedical devices, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2–5 August 2015, paper DETC2015-48034. New York: ASME.

46.

Zuo

. Bi-level optimization for the cross-sectional shape of a thin-walled car body frame with static stiffness and dynamic frequency stiffness constraints. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automoblie Engineering 2015; 229(8): 1046–1059.

47.

Roebuck

Odhams

AMC

Cebon

. An automatically reconfigurable software-based safety system for rear-steering multi-unit vehicles. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automoblie Engineering 2015; 229(2): 143–162.