In this paper we present an extension of the tank-to-wheel efficiency for hybrid electric vehicles. The energy at the wheel is split into dissipative energy and circulating energy. Instead of using one lumped tank-to-wheel efficiency, we use fuel-to-traction efficiency and recuperation efficiency. We further show that for a hybrid electric vehicle, fuel-to-traction efficiency and recuperation efficiency are almost constant and independent of the driving cycle. This fact makes our approach well suited for the estimation of the needed fuel energy for hybrid electric vehicles.
International Energy Agency (IEA). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, 2011.
2.
International Energy Agency (IEA). World energy outlook, 2011.
3.
BrinkmanNWangMWeberTDarlingtonT. Well-to-wheels analysis of advanced fuel/vehicle systems – a North American study of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions, 2005.
GuzzellaL. Automobiles of the future and the role of automatic control in those systems. Ann Rev Contr2009; 33: 1–10.
6.
AhmanM. Primary energy efficiency of alternative powertrains in vehicles. Energy2000; 26: 973–989.
7.
HuangWDZhangYHP. Energy efficiency analysis: Biomass-to-wheel efficiency related with biofuels production, fuel distribution, and powertrain systems. PLoS ONE2011; 6: e22113. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022113.
8.
ImaiSHoriiY. Total efficiency of a hybrid electric vehicle. In: Proceedings of the power conversion conference 2, Nagaoka, 1997, pp.947–950.
9.
MutaKYamazakiMTokiedaJ. Development of new-generation hybrid system THS II – Drastic improvement of power performance and fuel economy. SAE paper 2004-01-0064, 2004.
10.
WeissMAHeywoodJBDrakeEMSchaferAAuYeungFF. On the road in 2020 – a life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies. Energy Laboratory Report no. MIT EL 00-003, 2000.
11.
WilliamsonSSEmadiA. Comparative assessment of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicles based on comprehensive well-to-wheels efficiency analysis. IEEE Trans Vehic Technol2005; 54: 856–862.
12.
KatrasnikT. Energy conversion phenomena in plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles. Energy Convers Manage2011; 52: 2637–2650.
13.
MiCMasrurMAGaoDW. Hybrid electric vehicles. New York: Wiley, 2011.
14.
AnFSantiniD. Assessing tank-to-wheel efficiency of advanced technology vehicles. SAE paper 2003-01-0412, 2003.
15.
ForsenJ. Die Zyklusspezifische Holistische Maschineneffizienz. Automobiltechnische Z ATZ2011; 11: 862–867.
16.
KatrasnikTTrencFOpresnikSR. Analysis of energy conversion efficiency in parallel and series hybrid powertrains. IEEE Trans Vehic Technol2007; 56: 3649–3659.
17.
BanjacTTrencFKatrasnikT. Energy conversion efficiency of hybrid electric heavy-duty vehicles operating according to diverse drive cycles. Energy Convers Manage2009; 50: 2865–2878.
18.
HaraguchiT. Verbrauchsreduktion durch verbesserte Fahrzeugeffizienz. ATZ Automobiltechnische Z2011; 04: 275–279.
19.
KatrasnikT. Analytical framework for analyzing the energy conversion efficiency of different hybrid electric vehicle topologies. Energy Convers Manage2009; 50: 1924–1938.
20.
OttTGuzzellaLOnderC. How much fuel can a hybrid electric vehicle save?Report, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, 2011. DOI: 10.3929/ ethz-a-006886477.
21.
SundströmOGuzzellaL. A generic dynamic programming Matlab function. In: 18th IEEE international conference on control applications, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2009.
BertsekasDP. Dynamic programming and optimal control I. 3rd ed.Nashua, NH: Athena Scientific, 2005.
24.
SundströmOGuzzellaLSolticP. Optimal hybridization in two parallel hybrid electric vehicles using dynamic programming. In: Proceedings of the 17th IFAC world congress, 2008.
